ACT II.

ROSMER's _study. Doors and windows, bookshelves, a

writing-table. Door, with curtain, leading to ROSMER's

bedroom. ROSMER discovered in a smoking-jacket cutting

a pamphlet with a paper-knife. There is a knock at the

door. ROSMER says, "Come in." REBECCA enters in a morning

wrapper and curl-papers. She sits on a chair close to ROSMER,

and looks over his shoulder as he cuts the leaves. Rector

KROLL is shown up._

_Kroll_ (_lays his hat on the table and looks at REB. from head to

foot_). I am really afraid that I am in the way.

_Reb._ (_surprised_). Because I am in my morning wrapper and

curl-papers? You forget that I am _emancipated_, Rector KROLL.

[_She leaves them and listens behind curtain in ROSMER's

bedroom._

_Rosmer_. Yes, Miss WEST and I have worked our way forward in faithful

comradeship.

_Kroll_ (_shakes his head at him slowly_). So I perceive. Miss WEST

is naturally inclined to be forward. But, I say, _really_ you know--

However, I came to tell you that poor BEATA was not so mad as she

looked, though flowers _did_ bewilder her so. (_Taking off his gloves

meaningly._) She jumped into the mill-race because she had an idea

that you ought to marry Miss WEST!

_Rosmer_ (_jumps half up from his chair_). I? Marry--Miss WEST!

my good gracious, KROLL! I don't _understand_, it is _most_

incomprehensible. (_Looks fixedly before him_.) How _can_ people--

(_looks at him for a moment, then rises._) Will you get out? (_Still

quiet and self-restrained._) But first tell me why you never mentioned

this before?

_Kroll_. Why? Because I thought you were both orthodox, which made all

the difference. Now I know that you side with LAURITS and HILDA, and

mean to make the democracy into noblemen, and accordingly I intend to

make it hot for you in my paper. _Good_ morning! [_He slams the door

with spite as_ REBECCA _enters from bed-room._

_Rosmer_ (_as if surprised_). You--in my bedroom! You have been

listening, dear? But you _are_ so emancipated. Ah, well! so our pure

and beautiful friendship has been misinterpreted, bespattered! Just

because you wear a morning wrapper, and have lived here alone for

a year, people with coarse souls and ignoble eyes make unpleasant

remarks! But what really _did_ drive BEATA mad? _Why_ did she jump

into the mill-race? I'm sure we did everything we could to spare her!

I made it the business of my life to keep her in ignorance of all our

interests--_didn't_ I, now?

_Reb._ You did--but why brood over it? What _does_ it matter? Get on

with your great, beautiful task, dear, (_approaching him cautiously

from behind_), winning over minds and wills, and creating noblemen,

you know--_joyful_ noblemen!

_Rosmer_ (_walking about, restlessly, as if in thought_). Yes, I

know. I have never laughed in the whole course of my life--we ROSMERS

don't--and so I felt that spreading gladness and light, and making

the democracy joyful, was properly my mission. But _now_--I feel too

upset to go on, REBECCA, unless-- (_Shakes his head heavily._) Yes, an

idea has just occurred to me--(_looks at her, and then runs his hands

through his hair_)--oh, my goodness, no--I _can't_.

[_He leans his elbows on table._

_Reb._ Be a free man to the full, ROSMER--tell me your idea.

_Rosmer_ (_gloomily_). I don't know what you'll say to it. It's this.

Our platonic comradeship was all very well while I was peaceful and

happy. Now that I'm bothered and badgered, I feel--_why_, I can't

exactly explain, but I _do_ feel that I must oppose a new and living

reality to the gnawing memories of the past. I should, perhaps,

explain that this is equivalent to an Ibsenian proposal.

_Reb._ (_catches at the chairback with joy_). How? at _last_--a rise

at last! (_Recollects herself._) But what am I about? Am I not an

emancipated enigma? (_Puts her hands over her ears as if in terror._)

What are you saying? You mustn't. I can't _think_ what you mean. Go

away, do!

_Rosmer_ (_softly_). Be the new and living reality. It is the only way

to put BEATA out of the Saga. Shall we try it?

_Reb._ Never! Do not--_do_ not ask me why--for I haven't a notion--but

never! (_Nods slowly to him and rises._) White Horses would not induce

me! (_With her hand on door-handle._) Now you _know_! [_She goes out._

_Rosmer_ (_sits up, stares thunderstruck at the stove, and says to

himself_). Well--I--_am_-- [_Quick Curtain._

[The remaining two Acts of this subtle psychological study

unavoidably held over.]

* * * * *

"KEEP YOUR HARE ON!"

[Illustration: Hare's Theatre.]

In not following the advice given in the headline to this article,

clever Mr. PINERO has made a mistake. _Lady Bountiful_ with only a

very little HARE is a disappointment. The majority of those who go to

"Hare's Theatre" (they don't speak of it as "The Garrick") go to see

the Lessee and Manager in a new part: and they go to see a lot of him:

they don't ask merely for a small piece of HARE, if you please, though

they might be satisfied with HARE in a small piece. Everyone goes

expecting to see him in a good part in a good Comedy, his good part

being equal to the better part of the whole entertainment; and if they

don't so see him, they are disappointed. Why was Mr. GRUNDY's happy

translation of _Les Oiseaux_ peculiarly successful? because it was

a light, fresh, and pretty piece, wherein the occasional phrase in

a minor key was so artistically introduced as to be a relish to our

enjoyment of the humour of the characters and of the situations; but

all this would have gone for comparatively little had it not been

for the excellence of Mr. HARE's rendering of the first-rate part

of _Goldfinch_, which did not consist of occasional flashes, only to

collapse and disappear in the penultimate Act, but continued right

through to the end, dominating everything and everybody. This is not

so with _Lady Bountiful_. The appearance of _Roderick Heron_, who is

no creation of the Author's, as he admits, but merely _Mr. Skimpole_

under another name, raises hopes at the commencement, which are

blighted long before the finish. The part gutters out, as does Mr.

CHARLES GROVE's _John Veale_, another "promise of spring." Young Mr.

GILBERT HARE makes a most creditable first appearance as _Sir Lucian

Brent, Bart_. He is easy and natural.

For the greater part of the educated audience, it might have been

more useful if _Sir Richard Philliter, Q.C._, had gone about with an

old Eton Latin Grammar in his pocket, instead of a _Horace_; and if

Miss KATE RORKE had divided with him the quotation, "_Nemo mortalium

omnibus horis sapit._" He, being rejected, might have commenced,

"_Nemo mortalium_," and she might have continued, "_omnibus horis_;"

then, both together, "_sapit_." Or when she had snubbed him, he

might have made some telling remark about "_Verbum personale_," and

so forth. The introduction of a quotation from _Horace_ is likely

rather to be resented than appreciated by the victims of a superior

education. What a bad quarter of an hour or so Paterfamilias will have

when Materfamilias asks him for the translation of these lines from

_Horace_! Poor Pater will pretend not to have "quite caught them;" or

"not been attending;" but to himself he will own how entirely he has

forgotten his Latin, and perhaps he will make a good resolution to

himself to "look up his _Horace_ again." Then the learned young lady

will be asked by her Mamma, or by her sharp young bothering sister,

"what that Latin means," and though she might be able to construe

it when she sees it, to translate it offhand at one hearing is a

difficulty, and she will evade the question by saying, "Please, don't

talk! I want to listen to the piece."

The youth in the Stalls, fresh from college or school, will be about

as much equal to the translation offhand as is young _Sir Lucian

Brent_ when asked by Mr. CATHCART to give the meaning of the Latin on

the ancient brasses in the old church, and they won't thank you for

bringing school studies into playtime. On the whole, nothing is gained

by this Dr. Panglossian introduction of Latin quotation; it doesn't

help the action, nor emphasise a character, nor does it strengthen a

situation, to bring in even the most appropriate lines which are not

"in a language understanded of the people." _Sir Richard Philliter,

Q.C._, might be known in private life to his friends as Sir HORACE

DAVUS (_Non Oedipus_). Mr. CATHCART's _Pedgrift_, parish clerk and

sexton, is an excellent little character-sketch, as is also that of

_Mrs. Hornutt_, the pew-opener.

As for Mr. FORBES ROBERTSON and Miss KATE RORKE, they seemed to me to

be what the author had made them--i.e., stagey. Miss DOLORES DRUMMOND,

as _Mrs. Veale_, is very good, and Miss MARIE LINDEN, except in one

stagey bit in the Third Act, plays with great care and judgment.

The interior of the old country church (Act III.) is a masterpiece

of scenic art and stage arrangement,--a perfect picture by Mr.

W. HARFORD. I wish I could say the same of the _dénoûment_ of the

interrupted marriage, which strongly reminded me of a pictorial

heading to some exciting chapter in a penny novelette or _The London

Journal_. It is a very weak finish, and not strengthened or improved

in any way by the line _Sir Richard Philliter, Q.C._, has to say,

on which the Curtain descends. And what does everybody exclaim

afterwards? Simply, "Why there's nothing for HARE to do in it. We

thought we should see him again, and that he would come out all

right at last." That's the feeling. They can't bear the idea of their

favourite first-class Comedian being a sordid, swindling old villain,

unless the character be exceptionally amusing. _Lady Bountiful_ might

be termed "A bald piece," because it has so little HARE.

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 100, March 21, 1891 · 第 19 / 32 题