CHAPTER XI

INTERIOR WOOD FINISH

Mantels and staircases, the most important architectural features of

interiors, were very properly elaborated considerably beyond the

somewhat negative character of background accessories by the builders of

Colonial times. Virtually furnishings as well as necessary parts of the

house, the application of tasteful ornamentation to them seems amply

justified. Each is a subject in itself, as indicated by the fact that

stair building and mantel construction still remain independent trades

quite apart from ordinary joinery. For that reason two separate chapters

of this book have been devoted to these important subjects, the present

chapter being devoted to interior woodwork in general.

What the interior wood trim of the average eighteenth-century

Philadelphia house consists of is shown by accompanying photographs,

especially those in Stenton, Mount Pleasant and Whitby Hall. It is found

that the principal rooms of pretentious mansions, such as the hall,

parlor and reception room at Stenton, were sometimes entirely paneled

up on all sides. About this time, however, hand-blocked wall paper began

to be brought to America, and a favorite treatment of Colonial

interiors, including halls, parlors, dining rooms and even the principal

bedrooms of large houses, combined a cornice, or often a cornice and

frieze, and sometimes a complete entablature, with a paneled wainscot or

a flat dado with surbase and skirting, the wall between being papered.

Sometimes a dado effect was secured by means of a surbase above the

skirting, the plaster space between being left white as in the parlor at

Cliveden or in the hall and dining room at Whitby Hall, or papered like

the wall above, as in the parlor at Whitby Hall and in some of the

chambers at Upsala. Later the skirting only was frequently employed with

a simple cornice or picture mold, even in the principal rooms of the

better houses, as in the dining room at Whitby Hall. Several

accompanying illustrations show it with the dado, while a few interiors

of Mount Pleasant, Upsala and Cliveden show it with the paneled

wainscot. This general scheme constitutes a pleasing and consistent

application of the classic orders to interior walls, the dado, the wall

above it and whatever portion of the entablature happens to be employed

corresponding to the pedestal, shaft and entablature of the complete

order respectively. In a room so treated the dado becomes virtually a

continuous pedestal with a base or skirting and a surbase above the die

or plane face of the pedestal. Usually this surbase is molded to

resemble the upper fascia or the complete architrave of the various

orders. Again it may be hand-carved with vertical flutings, continuous,

as in the parlor at Upsala, or in groups of three or more in alternation

with an incised flower pattern, as in the Rex house.

For the most part the surmounting cornice and frieze of the room was of

wood, beautifully molded and often hand-carved, the architrave usually

being omitted. In the library at Solitude, however, is to be seen a

handsome cornice and frieze entirely of plaster or composition work in

the Adam manner, including familiar classic detail in which enriched

cavetto and ogee moldings, festoons, flower ornaments and draped human

figures are prominent. When chandeliers for candles began to be used in

private houses they were hung from ornamental centerpieces of plaster on

the ceiling, the motives usually being circles, ovals, festooned

garlands and acanthus leaves. Such a centerpiece and ornamental

treatment of the ceiling is also a feature of this room.

In most of the better houses during the Provincial period, important

rooms had paneled wainscots, papered walls and molded cornices, as in

the parlor and second-story hall at Mount Pleasant and in the parlor at

Upsala. Sometimes the plaster walls were left white or painted, as in

the hall at Cliveden and the library at Stenton. A fireplace with

paneled chimney piece was an important feature of most rooms, and the

entire wall including it was often completely paneled up, closely

relating the fireplace, doors or windows in a definite architectural

scheme, as already shown by examples in Stenton, Whitby Hall and Mount

Pleasant. Embrasured windows with two-part paneled folding shutters and

seats jutting somewhat into the room were customary in early brick and

stone houses, as at Stenton. These were fastened by bars of wood thrust

across from side to side and fitting into slots in the jambs. Later,

outside shutters came into vogue, and the jambs and soffit of the

embrasures were paneled, as at Whitby Hall, the treatment of the

Palladian window on the staircase landing in this house being an

especially fine example.

The parlor at Stenton is among the most notable instances in

Philadelphia of this architectural treatment of the fireplace in a room

with wood paneling throughout. Along Georgian lines and decidedly

substantial in character, it is essentially simple in conception and

graceful in form and proportion, the spacing of the large bolection

molded raised panels being excellent. First attention properly goes to

the wide chimney piece with its unusual, but attractive overmantel

paneling, low arched and marble-faced fireplace opening, beautiful brass

fender and andirons. The symmetrical arrangement of two flanking china

closets, with round-headed double doors recalling those shown at Whitby

Hall and Mount Pleasant, is most effective. The work is executed in a

masterly manner, the proportions being well calculated and the precision

of the hand tooling remarkably well maintained. Both the doors and

embrasured windows of this room merit careful study.

Of more modest, but generally similar treatment, is the paneling of the

reception room at Stenton, the fireplace opening here having been closed

for installation of a Franklin stove.

At Whitby Hall there are two interesting and characteristic examples of

embrasured windows with paneled jambs and soffits, and molded architrave

casings. In the dining room the embrasures are cased down to the window

seats, while in the parlor the casings with their broader sections at

top and bottom do not extend below the surbase, although the embrasure

continues to the floor. In this latter room one of the Colonial

builder's favorite motives, ever recurring with minor variations

throughout many houses, occupies the string course of the cornice. This

double denticulated member or Grecian fret band is formed by vertical

cross cuttings, alternately from top and bottom of a square molding, the

plain ogee molding beneath giving it just the proper emphasis.

Conforming to the characteristic panel arrangement of the time, most of

the inside doors of Philadelphia have six panels, the upper pair being

not quite square and the two lower pairs being oblong, the middle pair

being longer than the lower. Like outside doors they were for the most

part molded and raised with broad bevels, although occasionally, as on

the second floor at Mount Pleasant, they were flat and bolection molded,

giving the door a considerably different aspect. Generally speaking, the

workmanship was excellent, the beveling of the panels and the molding of

the stiles and rails manifesting the utmost painstaking. A simple knob

and key-plate, usually of brass, completed the complement of hardware,

apart from the H hinges of early years and the butts which soon

followed. It will be noted that all of these six-panel doors have stiles

and muntins of virtually equal width, any variation being slightly wider

stiles. Top and frieze rails are alike and about the same width as the

muntin, but the bottom rail is somewhat broader and the lock rail the

broadest of the four. Moldings are very simple and confined to the edge

of the panels, with the splayed or beveled panels of earlier years

gradually being abandoned in favor of plain, flat surfaces.

[Illustration: PLATE LXXXIV.--Interior Detail of Main Entrance, Congress

Hall; President's Dais, Senate Chamber, Congress Hall.]

[Illustration: PLATE LXXXV.--Gallery, Senate Chamber, Congress Hall.]

Architrave casings were the rule, sometimes extending to the floor and

often standing on heavy, square plinth blocks the height of the

skirting beneath its molding. There are instances of both types at

Mount Pleasant and Whitby Hall. The thickness of the walls in houses of

brick and stone encouraged the custom of paneling the jambs and soffit

of doorway openings to correspond with the paneling of the doors, the

effect being rich and very pleasing. Generally the architrave casing was

miter-joined across the lintel, as at Upsala, but in many of the better

houses this horizontal part of the casing was given an overhang of an

inch or two to form the doorhead. How pleasing this simple device was,

especially when a rosette of stucco was applied to each jog of the

casing, is well exemplified by the doors on the first floor at Whitby

Hall. Very similar door trim without the rosette is to be seen at

Cliveden and in numerous other houses.

At Mount Pleasant, and in several of the more pretentious old Colonial

mansions of Philadelphia, this type of door trim was elaborated by a

surmounting frieze and heavy pediment above the architrave casing. The

first floor hall at Mount Pleasant presents the interesting combination

of a pulvinated Ionic pediment with a mutulary Doric cornice and frieze

about the ceiling. Here one notices the flat dado and doors with raised

and molded panels as contrasted with the paneled wainscot and

bolection-molded, flat-paneled doors of the second-story hall. In this

latter, also, some of the pediments are complete, others broken,

illustrating another whim of the early American builders. Here the

cornice is also Ionic with jig-sawed modillions, and the ensemble is

generally more pleasing. In proportion and precision of workmanship this

woodwork is hardly excelled in Philadelphia. The simple, carefully

wrought dentil course of the doorheads lends a refining influence and

pleasing sense of scale that seems to lighten the design very

materially.

Philadelphia has no handsomer example of the enriched pedimental

doorhead than the interior treatment of the entrance doorway of the

Blackwell house, Number 224 Pine Street. Above the horizontal overhang

of the architrave casing across the lintel two beautifully carved

consoles, the width of the frieze in height, support a cornice which is

the base of a broken pediment. The familiar Grecian band or double

denticulated molding in the string course gives character to the

cornice, while an attractive leaf decoration in applied composition

adorns the recessed frieze panel. Projections of the cornice above the

consoles lend an added touch of refinement. This elaboration of the

white wood trim is further emphasized by the dark red-brown painting of

the door to simulate old mahogany, which became a frequent feature of

the houses of this period.

Round-headed doorways here and there, not only at the front entrance,

but elsewhere, as in the hall at Hope Lodge, provided a welcome

variation from the customary square-headed types and have been a

pleasing feature of Colonial interiors since early times. As framing the

glazed doorways of china closets already referred to, they were a

charming feature of the interior wood finish. At the front entrance the

round-headed doorway was utilized to provide an ornamental yet practical

fanlight transom over the door which admitted considerable light to

brighten the hall. As contrasted with this more graceful arrangement,

the broad front entrance to Whitby Hall, with its severely plain

unmolded four-panel double doors and wrought-iron strap hinges, bolts,

latch and great rim lock, is of quaint interest. The accompanying

photograph shows well the dado effect secured by a surbase and skirting,

and one notes with interest the cornice with its prominent modillions

and the heavy plinth blocks on which the architrave casings of the doors

stand.

Round-headed windows were employed for landing windows in stair halls,

as at Whitby Hall, and in the central part of the Palladian windows over

entrances, as at Mount Pleasant, where they became decorative interior

features of the front end of the second-floor halls.

Elliptical-headed openings are rare in Philadelphia, and in most

instances were arches across the main hall, as at Hope Lodge. Sometimes

they framed the staircase vista at the head or foot of the flight,

where they became one of the most charming features of the best Colonial

interiors.

The illustrations of interiors at Stenton accompanying this chapter,

serve, as might many others, to show that white-painted interior

woodwork, although one of the greatest charms of the Colonial house,

finds its principal mission in providing the only architectural

background that sets off satisfactorily the warmth of color and grace of

line possessed by eighteenth-century furniture in mahogany and other

dark woods. Bright and cheerful, chaste and beautiful, it emphasizes the

beauties of everything before it, yet seldom forces itself into undue

prominence. It is a scheme of interior treatment which has stood the

test of time and indicates what excellent taste the Colonial builders

manifested in resorting to its subtle influence to display their rare

pieces of furniture brought from England and the Continent.

The admirable work of Philadelphia joiners indicates conclusively the

many possibilities of white-painted soft woods. Unlike hardwood finish,

the natural grain of the wood is concealed by painting, so that broad

flat surfaces and simple moldings would be monotonous. Beauty of form is

therefore substituted for the beauty of wood grain. Classic motives and

detail are brought to bear upon the interior woodwork in such a manner

as to delight the eye, yet not to detract unduly from the furnishings

of the room. And the charm of much of the resulting woodwork indicates

an early realization by American craftsmen of the fact that a nice

balance between plain surface and decoration is as important as the

decoration itself. It was by their facility in the design and execution

of this woodwork that skilled wood-carvers were able to impart that

lightness, grace and ingenuity of adaptation to which the Colonial style

chiefly owes its charm.

The Colonial Architecture of Philadelphia · 第 11 / 12 章