106 B.--1840, June?--Near Boston?

107.--1840, July?--Molde fjord, Norway.--Mr. HAMMER, Mr. KRAFT, and

some other persons.

107 A.--1840, August?--“Along the whole line of the American coast”, i.

e. of the east coast of the U. S.

108.--1841.--Christiansund fjord, Norway.--Several persons.

109.--1842?--Romsdal fjord, Norway.--A parish priest.

110.--1842?--Romsdal fjord, Norway.--A gentleman.

111.--1843, Summer.--Christiansund fjord, Norway.

111 A.--1843, October?--Near Ibbestad, not far from Christiansand,

Norway.--Some fishermen.

112.--1845?--Near Bergen? Norway.--Some fishermen.

113.--1845.--Between Bergen and Sogn, Norway.--Mr. J. D. MORRIES

STIRLING, and two other gentlemen.

114.--1845 or 1846, Summer.--Camp’s Bay, near Cape Town.--Mr. G. D.

BRUNETTE, Mr. CHARLES A. FAIRBRIDGE.

115.--1845, July 28.--Romsdale fjord, Norway.--Mr. J. C. LUND, Mr. G.

S. KROCH, CHRISTIAN FLANG and JOHN ELGENSES.

117.--1846, August 8.--Between the islands of Sartor Leer and Tös,

and in Bjornfjord, near Bergen, Norway.--Several persons, DANIEL

SALOMONSON, his wife INGEBORG, ABRAHAM ABRAHAMSEN HAGENOES.

118.--1848, August 6.--Lat. 24° 44′ S., long 9° 22′ E., between the

Cape of Good Hope and St. Helena.--Mr. SARTORIS, midshipman, Lieutenant

EDGAR DRUMMOND, Captain PETER M’QUHAE, Mr. WILLIAM BARRETT, master, and

most of the officers and crew of H. M. S. _Daedalus_.

119.--1848?--The Gulf of California.--Captain the Hon. GEORGE HOPE.

120.--1848, December 31.--Lat. 41° 13′ N., long. 12° 31′ W., west of

Oporto.--An officer of H. M. S. _Plumper_.

121.--1849, February 18.--Off the south point of Cumberland Island,

about twelve miles from the St. John’s bar, Florida.--Captain ADAMS, of

the schooner _Lucy and Nancy_, and the crew and passengers of it.

122.--1849, May 30.--South of Australia, between 40° and 45° S. lat.,

and 110° and 145° W. long.--Captain EDWARDS, of the _Alpha_, Mr.

THOMSON, Mr. GEORGE PARK.

123.--1849, September 15.--Indian Ocean, between lat. 10° and 20° S.,

and long. 50° and 70° E.--An officer of H. M. S. _Cleopatra_.

124.--1850?--Between Iceland and the Far Öer.--Captain CRISTMAS.

125.--1853?--Fjords of Norway.

126.--1854, September 4.--Lat. 38° S., long. 13° E.--The Brig _Albeona_.

127.--1855, August?--Off St. Helena.--A Captain.

128.--1856, March 30.--Lat 29° 11′ N., long. 34° 26′ W.--Mr. J. H.

STATHAM, Captain JAMES GUY, of the _Imogen_, Mr. JULIAN B. HARRIES, Mr.

D. J. WILLIAMSON.

129.--1856, July 8.--Lat. 34° 56′ S., long. 18° 41′ E.--Captain A.

K. W. Tremearne of the ship _Princess_, Captain MORGAN, of the ship

_Senator_.

130.--1857, February 16.--In Table Bay, Cape Town.--Dr. BICCARD, his

wife, daughter and two sons, Mr. MURRAY and Mr. HALL.

131.--1857, December 12.--North east end of St. Helena distant 10

miles.--Captain GEORGE HENRY HARRINGTON, of the ship _Castilian_,

WILLIAM DAVIES, chief officer, EDWARD WHEELER, second officer.

132.--1858, January 26.--Lat. 19° 10′ S., long. 10° 6′ W., between the

Cape of Good Hope and St. Helena.--Captain SUCKLING of the _Carnatic_,

Captain SHUTTLEWORTH.

133.--1861? August, on a Sunday.--Nahant?--Dr. AMOS BINNEY, and above a

hundred persons.

134.--1861? August, the following Monday.--Nahant? from the piazza of

the hôtel.

135.--1863, May 16.--Between the Isles of Canary and the Cape Verde

Isles.--Mr. JOHN CHAPPLE, Rev. Mr. SMITH, on board the Screw Steamer

_Athenian_.

136.--1871.--Near the coast of Australia.--A second officer.

137.--1872, August 20.--The Sound of Sleat between the Isle of Skye and

the west coast of Scotland, and between Eigg and the mainland.--Rev.

JOHN MACRAY, Minister of Glenelg, Rev. DAVID TWOPENY, Vicar of

Stockbury, two ladies, F. and K., a gentleman, G. B., and a Highland

lad, on board the cutter _Leda_; also a Lady at Duisdale, in Skye.

138.--1872, August 21.--On the north side of the opening of Loch Hourn,

west coast of Scotland, and in the same Strait of Kylerhea, dividing

Skye from the mainland.--The same witnesses as of n^o. 137; the

ferrymen on each side of Kylerhea, FINLAY MACRAE, and other people.

139.--1872, August 23.--In the entrance of Lochduich.--ALEXANDER

MACMILLAN and his brother FARQUHAR.

140.--1872, August 24.--In the same locality.--The same witnesses.

141.--1873, Nov. 16?--Near Dunrobin castle, east coast of Sutherland,

Scotland.--Lady FLORENCE LEVESON GOWER and the Hon. Mrs. COKE.

142.--1873, Nov. 17?--Near Golspie, east coast of Sutherland,

Scotland.--Dr. SOUTAR.

143.--1873, Nov. 18?--The same locality.--Mr. JAMES.

144.--1875, July 8.--Lat. 5° 13′ S., long. 35° W., twenty miles from

Cape San Roque.--Captain DREVAR, of the barque _Pauline_, HORATIO

THOMPSON, JOHN HENDERSON LANDELLS, WILLIAM LEWARN, OWEN BAKER.

145.--1875, July 13.--Lat. 5° S., long 34° 10′ W., eighty miles from

Cape San Roque.--The same witnesses.

146.--1876, September 11.--Fifteen miles north west of North Sand

Lighthouse, in the Malacca Straits.--JOHN K. WEBSTER, Captain of the

British s. s. _Nestor_, and Mr. JAMES ANDERSON.

147.--1877, May 21.--Lat. 2° N., long. 90° 53′ E., Indian Ocean.--The

master of the barque GEORGINA.

148.--1877, June 2.--Off Cape Vito, Sicily.--Commander PEARSON of H. M.

Yacht _Osborne_, Mr. DOUGLAS HAYNES, Mr. FORSYTH, and Mr. MOORE.

149.--1879, January 28.--Lat. 12° 28′ N., long 43° 52′ E., Gulf of

Aden.--Major H. W. J. SENIOR, Dr. C. HALL, Miss. GREENFIELD, on board

the s. s. _City of Baltimore_.

150.--1879, March 30.--In Geographe Bay, Australia, near Lockville and

Busselton.--Rev. H. W. BROWN, Mr. C. M’GUIRE and his wife, Mr. M’MULLAN.

151.--1879, April 5.--Cape Satano, the most southern point of Japan,

distant about nine miles.--Captain DAVISON, Mr. MC. KECHNIE, of the

_Kiushiu Maru_.

152.--1879, August 5.--100 miles west of Brest, France.--Captain J. F.

COX, of the _Privateer_.

152 A.--1881, Nov. 12?--Near Monillepoint, not far from Cape

Town.--Mr. C. M. HANSEN, his wife and children, and several of his

neighbours.

153.--1882, May 28.--About six miles W.N.W. of Butt of Lewis (the

northern point of the Hebrides or Western Islands).--Some fishermen.

154.--1882, May 31.--The same locality.--Mr. WEISZ of the Lloydsteamer

_Kätie_, Mr. ANDREW SCHULTZ.

155.--1882, September 3.--Near Orme’s Heads, northern coast of Wales,

Irish Sea.--Mr. W. BARFOOT, Mr. F. J. MARLOW, Mrs. MARLOW, and several

other ladies and gentlemen.

156.--1883, October 15.--Bristol Channel.

157.--1885, August 16.--Between Rödö and Melö Isles, Nordland, Norway,

at lat. 66° 35′ N., long. 13° 21′ E.--Some lads.

158.--1886, August.--Near Kingston Point on the Hudson, New Jersey, U.

S. A.--Two young men.

159.--1886, August.--Near the east coast of U. S. A.

160.--1886, August.--Near the east coast of U. S. A.--JONAH.

161.--1889, May.--In the common track from Liverpool to

Philadelphia.--A captain.

162.--1890, June.--Near Long Island, not far from the coast of

Connecticut.--Captain DAVID TUITS of the schooner _Anny Harper_.

* * * * *

In these reports nearly all is very probable from a zoological point of

view, and there is but little that must be looked upon as fabulous.

Some statements, which at first seem to us to be exaggerations, we

unhesitatingly accept as truths, when we have taken a review of all

the reports together; either because they are constantly repeated, or

because they are confirmed by highly respectable testimonies of recent

date.

What now follows is an abstract of the 166 reports, enumerated above.

The numbers in brackets correspond with those placed in the list given

above, consequently also with those in my 4th. Chapter. Let us first

speak of the improbable things.

A. Fables, Fictions, Exaggerations and Errors.

At present nobody believes that the appearance of a strange animal on

the coast is a bad sign! In the sixteenth and the seventeenth century,

however, this was not uncommon. So we read that an appearance of a

sea-serpent portended a change in Norway (1), and that the appearance

of one in 1522 was followed by the banishment of King Christiernus and

by a great persecution of the Bishops; it also foretold the destruction

of the country (1). The snatching away of a man from a ship did not

happen without a terrible event in the Kingdom, without a change being

at hand, either that the princes would die or be banished, or that a

war would soon break out (p. 105). The Norwegian fishermen looked upon

its coming as a bad sign, for the fish would leave the coast (61).

Curious are also the characters described to the animal. It lives in

rocks and holes, and it comes out of its caverns only in summernights

and fine weather, to devour calves, lambs and hogs (p. 105). The eating

of cuttles, lobsters and all kinds of sea-crabs (p. 105) may also be a

story, though this is not quite improbable. The fables, often told of

Kraken and Spermwhales, that when sleeping on the surface of the water

they are taken for an islet, are also related of sea-serpents: “and

when it is slumbering on the Norway foam, the seamen deeming it some

island, fixed their anchor in its scaly rind” (p. 111).

It is also said to enclose ships by laying itself round them in a

circle; and to upset the ship (p. 109) if the seamen do not try to

escape, which they can manage to do when they row over its body there

where a coil is visible, for that when they reach the coil, it sinks,

while on the contrary the invisible part rises (p. 134, p. 227).

AREND BERNDSEN tells us that sea-serpents, as well as spermwhales,

often run down whole ships with all aboard (p. 134), and some north

sailors know that it had occasionally thrown itself across a yacht

of several hundred tons and dragged it to the bottom (p. 134). Mr.

Lee has sufficiently shown in his _Sea Monsters Unmasked_, that large

calamaries really sometimes snatch a man from a rowing boat; for a

long time this was considered to be a fable; now, however, zoologists

unconditionally accept it as truth. Such incidents, if happened,

are generally, but falsely, attributed by the Northern fishermen to

sea-serpents (p. 105, p. 108, p. 134).

It is not astonishing that by such people the sea-serpent is called

dangerous to seamen (p. 108, p. 134) and that they are very much

afraid of it (7, 14, p. 134, 61, 64, 65, 67, 92, 103, p. 259, 139,

157), and will never forget to take with them asa foetida or castoreum,

the smell of which the animal cannot bear (p. 130, p. 134, p. 259)

Moreover the fishermen advise to be very quiet when a sea-serpent

approaches, and to avoid rowing, because the least noise attracts the

animal (p. 259). Some believe that it casts its skin, as common snakes

do (p. 132), and that it is born on land, and lives in forests and

mountains till it can no longer hide its enormous body in it; then it

seeks some river and floats down to the sea (p. 133). When swimming,

sea-serpents don’t show their tail above the surface. Fishermen, in

their fear, would say: if one was near the head, the other end of the

animal could not be seen (103). I am convinced that this is one of

the reasons that the animal is sometimes said to be at least a cable

in length. The animal leaves behind itself a considerable wake, which

may be another reason that the witnesses exaggerated its length. So we

find: it is three hundred feet long (p. 107, 21), about 320 feet (106

A), six hundred and seventy feet (p. 130, 61), about a fourth of an

English mile (79), about 750 feet (85), from six hundred to 800 ells,

i. e. from 1340 to 1780 feet (103), more than 500 feet (130) or half a

mile long (156).

The thickness too is sometimes exaggerated (twenty feet, p. 105); the

head is described in some instances to be as large as a foering boat,

i. e. about twenty feet long (117, 146), or twelve feet long (126), or

perhaps ten feet long (118), and the tail fully a hundred and fifty

feet in length (146). The jaws are said to be of such an enormous size

that, if extended, they seemed sufficiently capacious to admit of a

tall man standing upright in them (118). It may be that the alleged

serpentine shape of the animal caused some writers to give scales to

the sea-serpent (p. 105), or that the distance was too large for a

closer examination, so that the observers thought it might have a hard

skin (5), or a rough coating (41, 51), or even a scaly one (39), or it

was the fear which made them see scales (157) which in reality did not

exist. Scales are also occasionally delineated (fig. 26) though the

eye-witness does not mention them, and even believed it belonged to the

eel-tribe (63). No wonder that such a terrible animal is often called

Leviathan (p. 111), an animal which raises its coils so high above

the water, that a ship can go through one of them (p. 109). Norwegian

fishermen really believe that the animal sometimes comes on land as

OLAUS MAGNUS (p. 105) and PONTOPPIDAN (p. 133) tell us, and as is

stated afterwards, when even distinct traces of it were said to have

been found in the fields (96).

In my opinion it is an error to believe that there are _two_ species

of sea-serpents (p. 107) or that there are several species of them all

belonging to the same genus (112). And also that the animal ever takes

a boat for one of the other sex, which induces it to follow the boat

(p. 133). This is a habit of the animal; but as it is a quite harmless

one, it is an error to believe that it grows furious when the pursued

are so fortunate as to escape (158), or that it may ever destroy them,

even after being struck with a boat-hook (112). That the shores of

Norway are the only in Europe, which are frequented by this monster (p.

135) is a positive error, since the animal is known to appear also on

the coasts of Great Britain, France, and even in the Mediterranean.

From what we now know of the division of the colours of the animal’s

body, I don’t hesitate to say that they are wrongly represented in

one of the drawings (fig. 31). The cetacean tail delineated in fig.

49 is explained in n^o. 151, the fish tail of fig. 26 in n^o. 63. The

definition that the eyes were of a greenish hue and looked devilish

(158) is certainly the result of an observation made in great fright.

I am sure that in cases wherein the colour of the head and neck are

described as a bluish green (29), or of a blue colour (29), or as blue

as possible (29), and that of the back of a dark green (30), these

definitions are the result of optical illusion, or the observers may

have been colour-blind.

The twelve fins (129, fig. 36) of which six are drawn on the left side

and six on the right side of the body emerging from the water, are

undoubtedly the result of an optical deception, as I have explained in

n^o. 129.--In the same way I have explained why the animal has a head

connected with the body without any indication of a neck, so that it

resembled a gigantic salamander (146), and that it seemed to be of a

gelatinous, that is flabby, substance (146), and that the motion of it

was apparently cork-screw-like (155).

In no case the antenna, ending in a crescent (106 A) or the ridge of

fins (148), or the discolouring of the water (131) observed, have

anything to do with the animal or with its appearance.

But let us now pass to the _facts_ which may be inferred from what is

reported of the animal.

B. Facts.

These are so numerous that I am obliged to bring them together under

several heads.

The great sea-serpent · 第 87 / 156 题