Before I had completed my general survey of the room, an attendant

greeted me courteously, and when I presented my letter of introduction

to the librarian he bowed low and led me the length of the hall. The

light came into the room through beautiful stained-glass windows,

bearing the Medici arms and the cipher of Giulio de’ Medici, later

Pope Clement VII, surrounded by arabesque Renaissance designs. We

passed between the _plutei_, those famous carved reading-desks

designed by Michelangelo. As we walked down the aisle, the pattern of

the nutwood ceiling seemed reflected on the brick floor, so cleverly

was the design reproduced in painted bricks. Gradually I became

impressed by the immense size of the room, which before I had not felt

because the proportions are so perfect.

Doctor Guido Biagi, who was at that time librarian, was seated at

one of the _plutei_, studying a Medicean illuminated manuscript

fastened to the desk by one of the famous old chains (see _page

14_). He was a Tuscan of medium height, rather heavily built, with

full beard, high forehead, and kindly, alert eyes. The combination of

his musical Italian voice, his eyes, and his appealing smile, made

me feel at home at once. Letters of introduction such as mine were

every-day affairs with him, and no doubt he expected, as did I, to

have our meeting result in a few additional courtesies beyond what

the tourist usually receives, and then that each would go his way. I

little realized, as I presented my letter, that this meeting was to be

so significant,--that the man whose hand I clasped was to become my

closest friend, and that through him the Laurenziana Library was to be

for me a sanctuary.

[Illustration: _Dott. Comm._ GUIDO BIAGI in 1924

Librarian of the Laurenziana Library, Florence]

After the first words of greeting, I said,

“I am wondering how much more I can absorb today. By mistake I came

in through the church, and found myself confronted by a series

of masterpieces so overpowering that I am almost exhausted by the

monuments of great personages and the important events they recall.”

“A fortunate mistake,” he replied smiling. “The entrance to the Library

should be forever closed, and every one forced to come in through the

church as you did, in order to absorb the old-world atmosphere, and be

ready to receive what I can give.--So this is your first visit? You

know nothing of the history of the Library?”

“Simply that everything was designed by Michelangelo,--and the names of

some of the priceless manuscripts in your collection.”

“It is not quite exact to say that everything was designed by the great

Buonarroti,” he corrected. “It was Michelangelo who conceived, but

Vasari who designed and executed. Let me show you the letter the great

artist wrote to Vasari about the stairway you just ascended” (_page

280_).

Leaving me for a moment he returned with a manuscript in his hand which

he read aloud:

_There is a certain stair that comes into my thoughts like a

dream, _the letter ran_; but I don’t think it is exactly

the one which I had planned at the time, seeing that it appears

to be but a clumsy affair. I will describe it for you here,

nevertheless. I took a number of oval boxes, each about one

palm deep, but not of equal length and breadth. The first and

largest I placed on a pavement at such distance from the wall

of the door as seemed to be required by the greater or lesser

degree of steepness you may wish to give the stair. Over this

was placed another, smaller in all directions, and leaving

sufficient room on that beneath for the foot to rest on in

ascending, thus diminishing each step as it gradually retires

towards the door; the uppermost step being of the exact width

required for the door itself. This part of the oval steps must

have two wings, one right and one left, the steps of the wings

to rise by similar degree, but not be oval in form._

“Who but a great artist could visualize that marvelous staircase

through a collection of wooden boxes!” Biagi exclaimed. “Vasari built

this great room, but the designs were truly Michelangelo’s,--even to

the carving of these _plutei_,” he added, laying his hand on the

reading-desk from which he had just risen. “See these chains, which

have held these volumes in captivity for over four hundred years.”

He asked me how long I was to be in Florence.

“For a week,” I answered, believing the statement to be truthful; but

the seven days stretched out into many weeks before I was able to break

the chains which held me to the Library as firmly as if they were the

links which for so many years had kept the Medicean treasures in their

hallowed places.

“Return tomorrow,” he said. “Enter by the private door, where Marinelli

will admit you. I want to keep your mind wholly on the Library.”

[Illustration: VESTIBULE of the LAURENZIANA LIBRARY, FLORENCE

Designed by Michelangelo]

The private door was the entrance in the portico overlooking the

cloister, held sacred to the librarian and his friends. At the

appointed hour I was admitted, and Marinelli conducted me immediately

to the little office set apart for the use of the librarian.

“Before I exhibit my children,” he said, “I must tell you the romantic

story of this collection. You will enjoy and understand the books

themselves better if I give you the proper background.”

Here is the story he told me. I wish you might have heard the words

spoken in the musical Tuscan voice:

Four members of the immortal Medici family contributed to the greatness

of the Laurenziana Library, their interest in which would seem to be a

curious paradox. Cosimo _il Vecchio_, father of his country, was

the founder. “Old” Cosimo was unique in combining zeal for learning

and an interest in arts and letters with political corruption. As his

private fortune increased through success in trade he discovered the

power money possessed when employed to secure political prestige. By

expending hundreds of thousands of florins upon public works, he gave

employment to artisans, and gained a popularity for his family with the

lower classes which was of the utmost importance at critical times.

Beneath this guise of benefactor existed all the characteristics of

the tyrant and despot, but through his money he was able to maintain

his position as a Mæcenas while his agents acted as catspaws in

accomplishing his political ambitions. Old Cosimo acknowledged to Pope

Eugenius that much of his wealth had been ill-gotten, and begged him to

indicate a proper method of restitution. The Pope advised him to spend

10,000 florins on the Convent of San Marco. To be sure that he followed

this advice thoroughly, Cosimo contributed more than 40,000 florins,

and established the basis of the present Laurenziana Library.

“Some of your American philanthropists must have read the private

history of Old Cosimo,” Biagi remarked slyly at this point.

Lorenzo the Magnificent was Old Cosimo’s grandson, and his contribution

to the Library was far beyond what his father, Piero, had given.

Lorenzo was but twenty-two years of age when Piero died, in 1469. He

inherited no business ability from his grandfather, but far surpassed

him in the use he made of literary patronage. Lorenzo had no idea of

relinquishing control of the Medici tyranny, but he was clever enough

to avoid the outward appearance of the despot. Throughout his life he

combined a real love of arts and letters with a cleverness in political

manipulation, and it is sometimes difficult correctly to attribute

the purpose behind his seeming benevolences. He employed agents to

travel over all parts of the world to secure for him rare and important

codices to be placed in the Medicean Library. He announced that it was

his ambition to form the greatest collection of books in the world, and

to throw it open to public use. Such a suggestion was almost heresy in

those days! So great was his influence that the Library received its

name from his.

The third Medici to play an important part in this literary history was

Lorenzo’s son, Cardinal Giovanni, afterwards Pope Leo X. The library

itself had been confiscated by the Republic during the troublous times

in which Charles VIII of France played his part, and sold to the

monks of San Marco; but when better times returned Cardinal Giovanni

bought it back into the family, and established it in the Villa Medici

in Rome. During the fourteen years the collection remained in his

possession, Giovanni, as Pope Leo X, enriched it by valuable additions.

On his death, in 1521, his executor, a cousin, Giulio de’ Medici,

afterwards Pope Clement VII, commissioned Michelangelo to erect a

building worthy of housing so precious a collection; and in 1522 the

volumes were returned to Florence.

Lorenzo’s promise to throw the doors open to the public was

accomplished on June 11, 1571. At that time there were 3,000 precious

manuscripts, most of which are still available to those who visit

Florence. A few are missing.

The princes who followed Cosimo II were not so conscious of their

responsibilities, and left the care of the Library to the Chapter of

the Church of San Lorenzo. During this period the famous manuscript

copy of Cicero’s work, the oldest in existence, disappeared. Priceless

miniatures were cut from some of the volumes, and single leaves from

others. Where did they go? The _Cicero_ has never since been heard

of, but the purloining of fragments of Laurenziana books undoubtedly

completed imperfections in similar volumes in other collections.

The House of Lorraine, which succeeded the House of Medici, guarded the

Laurenziana carefully, placing at its head the learned Biscioni. After

him came Bandini, another capable librarian, under whose administration

various smaller yet valuable collections were added in their entirety.

Del Furia continued the good work, and left behind a splendid catalogue

of the treasures entrusted to him. These four volumes are still to be

found in the Library. In 1808, and again in 1867, the libraries of

the suppressed monastic orders were divided between the Laurentian

and the Magliabecchian institutions; and in 1885, through the efforts

of Pasquale Villari, the biographer of Machiavelli, the Ashburnham

collection, numbering 1887 volumes, was added through purchase by the

Italian Government.

“Now,” said Biagi, as he finished the story, “I am ready to show you

some of the Medici treasures. I call them my children. They have always

seemed that to me. My earliest memory is of peeping out from the back

windows of the Palazzo dei della Vacca, where I was born, behind the

bells of San Lorenzo, at the campanile of the ancient church, and at

the Chapel or the Medici. The Medici coat of arms was as familiar to me

as my father’s face, and the ‘pills’ that perpetuated Old Cosimo’s fame

as a chemist possessed so great a fascination that I never rested until

I became the Medicean librarian.”

Biagi led the way from his private office through the Hall of

Tapestries. As we passed by the cases containing such wealth of

illumination, only partially concealed by the green curtains drawn

across the glass, I instinctively paused, but my guide insisted.

“We will return here, but first you must see the Tribuna.”

We passed through the great hall into a high-vaulted, circular

reading-room.

“This was an addition to the Library in 1841,” Biagi explained, “to

house the 1200 copies of original editions from the fifteenth-century

Presses, presented by the Count Angiolo Maria d’Elchi. Yes--” he added,

reading my thoughts as I glanced around; “this room is a distinct

blemish. The great Buonarroti must have turned in his grave when it

was finished. But the volumes themselves will make you forget the

architectural blunder.”

He showed me volumes printed from engraved blocks by the Germans,

Sweynheym and Pannartz, at Subiaco, in the first Press established in

Italy. I held in my hand Cicero’s _Epistolæ ad Familiares_, a

volume printed in 1469. In the _explicit_ the printer, not at all

ashamed of his accomplishment, adds in Latin:

_John, from within the town of Spires, was the first to print

books in Venice from bronze types. See, O Reader, how much hope

there is of future works when this, the first,

has surpassed the art of penmanship_

There was Tortelli’s _Orthographia dictionum e Græcia tractarum_,

printed in Venice by Nicolas Jenson, showing the first use of Greek

characters in a printed book. The Aldine volumes introduced me to the

first appearance of Italic type. No wonder that Italy laid so firm a

hand upon the scepter of the new art, when Naples, Milan, Ferrara,

Florence, Piedmont, Cremona, and Turin vied with Venice in producing

such examples!

“You must come back and study them at your leisure,” the librarian

suggested, noting my reluctance to relinquish the volume I was

inspecting to receive from him some other example equally interesting.

“Now I will introduce you to the prisoners, who have never once

complained of their bondage during all these centuries.”

In the great hall we moved in and out among the _plutei_, where

Biagi indicated first one manuscript and then another, with a few words

of explanation as to the significance of each.

“No matter what the personal bent of any man,” my guide continued,

“we have here in the Library that which will satisfy his intellectual

desires. If he is a student of the Scriptures, he will find inspiration

from our sixth-century _Syriac Gospels_, or the _Biblia Amiatina_. For

the lawyer, we have the _Pandects of Justinian_, also of the sixth

century, which even today form the absolute basis of Roman law. What

classical scholar could fail to be thrilled by the fourth-century

_Medicean Virgil_, with its romantic history, which I will tell

you some day; what lover of literature would not consider himself

privileged to examine Boccaccio’s manuscript copy of the _Decameron_,

or the Petrarch manuscript on vellum, in which appear the famous

portraits of Laura and Petrarch; or Benvenuto Cellini’s own handwriting

in his autobiography? We must talk about all these, but it would be too

much for one day.”

Leading the way back to his sanctum, Biagi left me for a moment. He

returned with some manuscript poems, which he turned over to me.

“This shall be the climax of your first day in the Laurenziana,” he

exclaimed. “You are now holding Michelangelo in your lap!”

Can you wonder that the week I had allotted to Florence began to seem

too brief a space of time? In response to the librarian’s suggestion I

returned to the Library day after day. He was profligate in the time he

gave me. Together we studied the _Biblia Amiatina_, the very copy

brought from England to Rome in 716 by Ceolfrid, Abbot of Wearmouth,

intended as a votive offering at the Holy Sepulchre of Saint Peter. By

this identification at the Laurenziana in 1887 the volume became one of

the most famous in the world. In the plate opposite, the Prophet Ezra

is shown by the artist sitting before a book press filled with volumes

bound in crimson covers of present-day fashion, and even the book in

which Ezra is writing has a binding. It was a new thought to me that

the binding of books, such as we know it, was in practice as early as

the eighth century.

[Illustration: THE PROPHET EZRA. From _Codex Amiatinus_, (8th Century)

_Showing earliest Volumes in Bindings_

Laurenziana Library, Florence (12 × 8)]

At another time we examined the _Medicean Virgil_ written on

vellum, dating back to the fourth century, and the oldest Codex of the

Latin poet.

“This is a veritable treasure for the classical scholar, is it not?”

Biagi inquired. “While the Medicean collection remained in the hands

of the Chapter of San Lorenzo some vandal cut out the first leaves.

See,--the text now begins at the 48th line of the 6th Eclogue.”

I felt almost as if I were looking at a mutilated body, so precious did

the manuscript seem.

“In 1799,” the librarian continued, “these sheets were carried to

France as part of the Napoleonic booty. Later, through the good

offices of Prince Metternich, under a special article in the Treaty of

Vienna, the volume was returned to Italy. In 1816 a solemn festival

was held here in Florence to celebrate its restoration to the Library.

Such events as these,” Biagi added, “show you the place the book holds

in the hearts of the Italian people. Look!” he exclaimed, pointing

disgustedly at the stiff, ugly binding placed upon the _Virgil_ in

Paris during its captivity. “See how little the French appreciated what

this volume really is!”

The Petrarch manuscript yielded me the originals of the famous

portraits of Madonna Laura de Noves de Sale and of Messer Francesco

Petrarca which had hung in my library for years; my friend’s comments

made them assume a new meaning. The poet’s likeness so closely

resembles other more authentic portraits that we may accept that of

Madonna Laura as equally correct, even though the same opportunity for

comparison is lacking. What could be more graceful or original than the

dressing of the hair, recalling the elegance of the _coiffures_

worn by the ladies of Provence and France rather than of Italy, even

as the little pearl-sewn cap is absolutely unknown in the fashions

of Petrarch’s native country. After looking at the painting, we can

understand the inspiration for Petrarch’s lines:

Say from what vein did Love procure the gold

To make those sunny tresses? From what thorn

Stole he the rose, and whence the dew of morn,

Bidding them breathe and live in Beauty’s mould?

So we discussed the treasures which were laid out before me as I

returned again and again to the Library. The illuminated volumes showed

me that marvelous Book of Hours Francesco d’Antonio made for Lorenzo

the Magnificent, which is described in an earlier chapter (_page

146_); I became familiar with the gorgeous pages of Lorenzo Monaco,

master of Fra Angelico; of Benozzo Gozzoli, whose frescoes give the

Riccardi its greatest fame; of Gherado and Clovio, and other great

artists whose names are unknown or forgotten.

Besides being librarian of the Laurenziana, Biagi was also custodian

of the Buonarroti and the da Vinci archives. Thus it was that during

some of my visits I had the opportunity to study the early sketches of

the great Leonardo, and the manuscript letters of Michelangelo. Such

intimacies gave me an understanding of the people and the times in

which they worked that has clothed that period with an everlasting halo.

As our friendship expanded through our work together, Biagi introduced

me to other fascinations, outside the Library. I came to know Pasquale

Villari and other great Italian intellects. My friend and I planned

Odysseys together,--to Vallombrosa, to Pisa, to Perugia, to Siena. We

visited the haunts of Dante.

Nor was our conversation devoted wholly to the literary spirits of

antiquity. One day something was said about George Eliot. I had always

shared the common fallacy that she was entitled to be classified as the

greatest realist of the analytical or psychological school; yet I had

always marveled at the consummate skill which made it possible for her,

in _Romola_, to draw her characters and to secure the atmosphere

of veritable Italians and the truest Italy without herself having lived

amongst the Florentines and assimilating those unique peculiarities

which she so wonderfully portrayed. For I had accepted the myth that

she had only passed through Italy on her memorable trip with the Brays

in 1849, and secured her local color by study.

I made some allusion to this, and Biagi smiled.

“Where did you get that idea?” he asked. “Her diary tells you to the

contrary.”

I could only confess that I had never read her diary.

“George Eliot and Lewes were in Florence together in 1861,” he

continued; “and it was because they were here that _Romola_ became

a fact.”

Enjoying my surprise, the librarian became more communicative:

“They studied here together from May 4 until June 7, 1861, at the

Magliabecchian Library,” said he, “and I can tell you even the titles

of the books they consulted.”

Perhaps I showed my incredulity.

“I have discovered the very slips which Lewes signed when he took out

the volumes,” he continued. “Would you like to see them?”

By this time Biagi knew me too well to await my response. So we walked

together over to the Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale, the library which

became famous two hundred and fifty years ago through the reputation

of a jeweler’s shop boy, Antonio Magliabecchi, and was known as

the Biblioteca Magliabecchiana for more than a century before the

Biblioteca Palatina was joined with it in 1860 under its present modern

and unromantic name.

[Illustration: ANTONIO MAGLIABECCHI

_Founder of the Magliabecchia Library, Florence_]

As we walked along Biagi told me of the unique personality of this

Magliabecchi, which attracted the attention of the literary world while

he was collecting the nucleus of the library. Dibdin scouted him,

declaring that his existence was confined to the “parade and pacing of

a library,” yet so great was his knowledge and so prodigious his memory

that when the Grand Duke of Florence asked him one day for a particular

volume, he was able to reply:

“The only copy of this work is at Constantinople, in the Sultan’s

library, the seventeenth volume in the second bookcase on the right as

you go in.”

We entered the old reading hall, which is almost the only portion of

the building still remaining as it was when George Eliot and George

Henry Lewes pursued their studies at one of the massive walnut tables.

The jeering bust of Magliabecchi is still there; the same volumes,

resting upon their ornamental shelves, still await the arrival of

another genius to produce another masterpiece--but except for these the

Library has become as modernized as its name.

“I was going over some dusty receipts here one day,” my friend

explained, “which I found on the top of a cupboard in the office of the

archives. It was pure curiosity. I was interested in the names of many

Italian writers who have since become famous, but when I stumbled upon

a number of receipts signed ‘G. H. Lewes,’ I realized that I was on

the track of some valuable material. These I arranged chronologically,

and this is what I found.”

Now let me go back a little, before, with Biagi’s help, I fit these

interesting receipts into the story of the writing of the book as told

by George Eliot’s diary, which I immediately absorbed.

_Silas Marner_ was finished on March 10, 1861, and on April 19 the

author and Lewes “set off on our second journey to Florence.” After

arriving there, the diary tells us that they “have been industriously

foraging in old streets and old books.” Of Lewes she writes: “He was in

continual distraction by having to attend to my wants, going with me to

the Magliabecchian Library, and poking about everywhere on my behalf.”

[Illustration: Library Slips used by George Eliot in the Magliabecchia

Library, Florence, while writing _Romola_]

The first slip signed by Lewes is dated May 15, 1861, and called for

Ferrario’s _Costume Antico e Moderno_. This book is somewhat

dramatic and superficial, yet it could give the author knowledge of

the historical surroundings of the characters which were growing in

her mind. The following day they took out Lippi’s _Malmantile_,

a comic poem filled with quaint phrases and sayings which fitted well

in the mouths of those characters she had just learned how to dress.

Migliore’s _Firenze Illustrata_ and Rastrelli’s _Firenze

Antica e Moderna_ gave the topography and the aspect of Florence at

the end of the fifteenth century.

From Chiari’s _Priorista_ George Eliot secured the idea of the

magnificent celebration of the Feast of Saint John, the effective

descriptions of the cars, the races, and the extraordinary tapers. “It

is the habit of my imagination,” she writes in her diary, “to strive

after as full a vision of the medium in which a character moves as of

the character itself.” Knowledge of the Bardi family, to which the

author added Romola, was secured from notes on the old families of

Florence written by Luigi Passerini.

“See how they came back on May 24,” Biagi exclaimed, pointing to a slip

calling for _Le Famiglie del Litta_, “to look in vain for the

pedigree of the Bardi. But why bother,” he continued with a smile; “for

Romola, the Antigone of Bardo Bardi, was by this time already born in

George Eliot’s mind, and needed no further pedigree.”

Romance may have been born, but the plot of the story was far from

being clear in the author’s mind. Back again in England, two months

later, she writes, “This morning I conceived the plot of my novel with

new distinction.” On October 4, “I am worried about my plot,” and on

October 7, “Began the first chapter of my novel.”

In quest of the perfect book · 第 12 / 14 段