This East Wretham is the parish of that William Cratfield, “Rector of

Wrotham, in Norfolk,” who, as “a common and notorious thief and lurker

on the roads, and murderer and slayer,” in unholy alliance with one

“Thomas Tapyrtone, farryer,” had in 1416 plied the trade of highwayman

on Newmarket Heath, and being charged with robbing a Londoner of £12,

was, with his concubine, flung into Newgate, where he died. What became

of his improper companion, or even of Tapperton, is unknown.

But the clergy around Thetford in times of old included several queer

characters. There was Lowe, the curate of Rockland, who on January 12th,

1608, aided by the rector’s wife, murdered the Rev. Mr. James, the

rector of that place. Lowe was hanged at Thetford and Mrs. James burnt

at the stake. Again, in 1635, the rector of Santon Downham was charged

with being “an alehouse haunter and swearer, being distempered with

liquor, keeping malignant company, and calling the Puritans hypocrites.”

[Illustration: THE RUINED CHURCH OF ROUDHAM.]

Nay, not merely the clergy of this district, but of broad Norfolk, might

be made to figure in a _chronique scandaleuse_; and if we had a mind to

it, we could end in modern times with that thirsty clerk who was found,

very drunken, beside the river at Stratton Strawless, declaring he would

drink that up before he left. He must have been like to that wondrous

toper created by one of the loveliest slips ever made by a reporter; who

would strain at a gnat and swallow a canal; which we must allow to be a

more heroic feat than swallowing the more usual camel.

Roudham Heath owes its name to the parish and village of Roudham. The

village stood less than half a mile to the right of the road, but has in

these latter days wholly disappeared, save for fewer than half a dozen

cottages and the gaunt ruins of the great church. Roudham church owes

its ruinated condition to the fire that burnt it in 1736, a disaster

caused by carelessness on the part of plumbers at work on the leads of

the tower. Tradition says funds were collected for the repair of the

building, but the treasurer made off with them. Roudham’s local industry

was that of malting; but the place is a scene of desolation, punctuated

and italicised by the two inhabited cottages that neighbour the ruins

and look on to the almost impassable road. The place has now no church,

no chapel, no charities, no shop, no pub, no anything; but it was

formerly a large and populous village, with two inns—the “Dolphin” and

“Three Hoops.” Foundations of vanished buildings are still visible in

some of the fields

XL

LARLINGFORD, a tiny hamlet on the Thet, in a dip of the road, long since

became a misnamed place, for the ford is replaced by a bridge, itself of

a respectable age. Two miles beyond the old ford there existed in

Ogilby’s time, in the second half of the seventeenth century, a beacon

on the right-hand side of the road, duly pictured on his road map as a

cresset, or fire-basket, mounted on a post and reached by ladders; a

contrivance eloquently witnessing to the wild state of the road in those

times.

[Illustration: LARLINGFORD.]

A little way beyond the site of the old beacon, at Hargham—or, as the

country folk have it, “Harfham”—cross-roads, stands a time-worn stone

shaft, reared on equally shapeless steps. The country folk call this

shattered stump of an ancient wayside cross “Cockcrow Stone.”

It is only when exploring to right and left of the road, along the

byways, that the stranger comes in touch with rural life. The great

highway goes lonely, for mile after mile the country seems deserted;

but, unknown to him who does not turn aside from the beaten track,

villages cluster, like beads upon a string, continuously along the

lesser roads. A little way back from these cross-roads of Hargham comes

Hargham village, and then the village of Wilby, in whose church,

recently restored, has been discovered, under one of the old

floor-boards, a lady’s hawking gauntlet some three centuries old. Framed

and exhibited on the wall, it forms a trivial yet intimate link with the

past.

But to reach the church and village one must pass Wilby Old Hall, a

romantic building of red brick, with corbie-stepped gables, that peer

darkly across the meadows. One cannot resist a closer glance, and the

old place well repays that attention. It is now, and long has been, a

farmhouse, but was built as a mansion somewhere about the beginning of

the seventeenth century. It was when Elizabeth reigned, or in the first

years of James I., that the hall first rose within the girdle of its

moat: that moat only in part now remaining, but still plentifully

stocked with fish. A family of Lovells probably built it; but the place

soon passed from them into the hands of the Wiltons, of whom Robert

Wilton, a Royalist colonel, had it at the time of the Civil War.

Scratched with a diamond on a pane of one of the old casement windows of

an upstairs bedroom is the name “Elizabeth,” with the date 1649. The

surname is included, but is illegible. Perhaps it was this Elizabeth who

inscribed the Latin lines on another window—lines that seemed to hint at

some heavy sorrow. “Alas!” they said, when translated, “Alas! how can I

tune my lute to a broken heart!” We may seek in vain for the personal

sorrow that prompted this record; or was it the outpouring of a loyal

soul? for the year 1649, when the unknown Elizabeth inscribed her name

on the other casement, was the date of the execution of Charles I.

[Illustration: WILBY OLD HALL.]

Those lines, we say, _seemed_ to hint, and they are thus spoken of

because quite recently, when the house was the scene of a sale at

auction and pervaded by strangers, some unknown person prized the

inscribed pane out of its leaden setting and made off with it. Invoking

a murrain on all such, we come into the ancient market-town of

Attleborough.

XLI

ATTLEBOROUGH, quiet enough on all other days of the week, wakes up and

does a considerable business on market-day, although even that weekly

fixture does not command the trade of sixty years ago, before the

railway brought the better marketing of Norwich within reach. But the

trade of the town is still large enough to support several large inns, a

Corn Hall, and a long street of shops. It would be unprofitable to argue

the origin of the “Attle” in the place-name, for it has already been

discussed by Norfolk antiquaries without any light being thrown on it,

excepting the fact that the name is shared with Attlebridge on the river

Wensum, fifteen miles away. Some topographers, mindful of the fact that

the youthful Etheling, or Saxon noble, afterwards Edmund, King of East

Anglia, spent a year at this place in A.D. 856 in pious preparation for

his kingly and saintly career, have thought the place to be named after

him, Etheling-borough; while others are of opinion it enshrines the name

of some otherwise unrecorded chieftain whose stronghold was the burh or

mound that gives the “borough” termination. However that may be,

Attleborough is a place of greater age than might be thought from a

casual glance. Nothing in it, except the great church, is of any high

antiquity, for the College of the Holy Cross, founded by Sir Robert

Mortimer late in the fourteenth century, has disappeared, and the church

itself, a part of that religious establishment, although still very

large, has been reduced from its original size. All this destruction

took place in the time of Henry VIII., when such things were repeated at

every monastery and religious college in the land. At that time the

Mortimers, the ancient lords of the manor, had given place to the

Radcliffes, then newly created Earls of Sussex, and Robert, the first

Earl, who ruled at that period, lent a willing hand. One might almost

suppose him to have been animated by a personal hatred of his forbears,

for it is still recorded in the parish register how he busied himself in

the work of demolition and tore up many “fair marble gravestones of his

ancestors, with monuments of brass upon them, and carried them, with

other fair good pavement, and laid them for floors in his hall, kitchen,

and larder-house.” He died in 1542, and was buried in the City church of

St. Lawrence Pountney, London. In later years the bodies of himself and

his son, with those of their wives, were removed to the church of

Boreham, in Essex. With the grandson, the line of Radcliffes, Earls of

Sussex, ended; and in that church their three marble effigies lie side

by side, on one elaborate altar-tomb, fulfilling the threat, or

prophecy, that in the third generation of that spoiler of the Church his

race should become extinct.

These records of old time explain how it comes that Attleborough church

tower is so oddly situated at the east end of the building. It was once

at the centre of the cruciform church, but the choir being destroyed in

that time of trouble, it is now, of course, immediately over what is now

the chancel.

[Illustration: ATTLEBOROUGH.]

Standing beside the high road, the church is, of course, a very

prominent object. It has a singularly beautiful north porch, containing

an ancient wooden poor’s-box. Under a slab in the nave rests that

Captain John Gibbs of Charles II.’s time, who earned a kind of fame by

his foolhardy feat of driving his chaise and four horses over the

deepest part of the Devil’s Ditch, on Newmarket Heath, for a wager of

£500. The chancel is Norman architecture, the nave and aisles Decorated

and Perpendicular. The pulpit is part of the spoil of one of the City of

London churches, demolished in modern times, and the magnificent

rood-screen is now at the west end, painted white, decorated with the

arms of thirty dioceses, and black-lettered with moral maxims from the

Proverbs, the work of the Rev. John Forbie, vicar in the first half of

the seventeenth century, commentator in the parish registers upon

national and local events, and censor, in the safe seclusion of those

pages, of his parishioners’ characters. His favourable opinion of James

I. is seen in the entry made when that monarch died: “It might be truly

said of him, as in the Gospell, ‘Never man spake as this man speaketh.’”

John Forbie evidently did not dislike Scots pawkiness.

His _post-mortem_, testimonial in 1625 to the landlady of the “Cock”

inn—a hostelry still standing by the roadside at the entrance to the

town—is hearty. “August 11th,” he says, “there was buried Mary, the wife

of Gilbert Greene, hostess of the ‘Cock,’ who knew how to gaine more by

her trade than any other, and a woman free and kind for any one in

sickness ... and for answering (_i.e._, standing godmother) to any one’s

child, and readie to give to any one’s marriage.” Surely, one thinks, it

was ill sojourning at the house of one so accomplished in gaining more

by her trade than any other. Did she accomplish it by overcharging her

guests or diluting their drinks?

He records the death of one John Dowe, “an unprofitable tradesman of

great estate.” This, he says severely, and moved to verse by

indignation, should have been his epitaph:—

Here lyeth the Dowe who ne’er in life did good,

Nor would have done, tho’ longer he had stood.

A wife he had, bothe beautiful and Wise,

But he ne’er would such goodness exercise.

Death was his friend, to bring him to his grave,

For he in Life _Commendam_ none could have.

The situation of Attleborough, isolated on the lonely flats, surrounded

by commons, must have been singularly aloof from the world in days of

old. Up to the very doors of the townsfolk came the dangers of those

far-off times, as we may perceive in the road that now leads to the

railway station, but is marked on old maps as “Thieves’ Lane.” Where

those thieves lurked, there now stand the respectable red-brick villas

of modern times, with a “Peace Monument” of 1856 at the cross-roads,

celebrating the close of the Crimean War, and at one and the same time

recording the victories of that strife and acting as lamp-post, general

gazetteer, and compendious milestone

XLII

To Wymondham is our next stage, a flat six miles.

In midst of this level tract of country, where villages, and houses

even, are few and far between, the wayfarer’s eye lights upon a stone

pillar on the grassy selvedge of the road, a dilapidated object that

looks like a milestone. But as it occurs only three-quarters of a mile

after passing the sixteenth stone from Thetford, it is clearly something

else, and inspection is rewarded by the discovery of this inscription:—

“THIS PILLAR | was erected by | the order of the sessions of the | Peace

of Norfolk | as a gratefull | remembrance of | the Charity of | Sir

Edwin Rich Knt | who freely gave | y^e sume of Two hundred | povnds

towards y^e | repaire of y^e highway betweene Wymondham | and

Attleborough | A.D. 1675.”

Who, then, was this Sir Edwin Rich, whose charity was so necessary to

the upkeep of these six miles of road between Attleborough and

Wymondham? He was a distinguished lawyer, a native of Thetford, born in

1594. His monument in the church of Mulbarton, three miles from

Wymondham, rich in moral reflections, surmounted by a large hour-glass,

and further adorned with eulogistic verse written by himself on himself,

quaintly tells us the circumstances of his birth and breeding:—

Our Lyef is like an Hower Glasse, and our Riches are like Sand

in it, which runs with us but the time of our Continuance here,

and then must be turned up by another.

To speak to God, as if men heard you talk,

To live with men, as if God saw you walk.

When thou art young, to live well thou must strive;

When thou art old, to dye well then contryve;

Thetford gave me breath, and Norwich Breeding,

Trinity College in Cambridge Learning.

Lincoln’s Inne did teach me Law and Equity.

Reports I have made in the Courts of Chancery,

And though I cannot skill in Rhymes, yet know it,

In my Life I was my own Death’s Poet;

For he who leaves his work to other’s Trust

May be deceived when he lies in the Dust.

And, now I have travell’d thro’ all these ways,

Here I conclude the Story of my Days;

And here my Rhymes I end, then ask no more,

Here lies Sir Edwin Rich, who lov’d the poor.

He died in 1675, at the advanced age of eighty-one, and not only left

those £200 towards the repair of the road, but made the curious bequest

to the poor of Thetford of the annual sum of £20, to be distributed for

five hundred years, on every 24th of December, in bread or clothing. Why

he should have limited his charity to a mere five centuries does not

appear, nor does it seem to be clearly understood what is then to become

of the property of Rose Hill Farm, Beccles, whence the income is

derived. Perhaps he thought the end of the world will have come by that

time.

It will be observed that Sir Edwin was a prudent as well as a pious

man. Desiring some recognition of his excellent traits and

achievements, he judged it best to write the epitaph himself: and a

very curious mixture of humility and pride it is. There were

sufficient reasons for his leaving a bequest for the maintenance of

this road, which was in his time an open track, going unfenced the

whole twenty-nine miles between Thetford and Norwich, and plunged in

the fourteen miles between Larlingford and Wymondham into successive

bogs and water-logged flats. If we consult a large map of Norfolk and

scan this district well, it will be seen that on descending from the

uplands of Thetford Heath to the Thet at Larlingford the road

traverses a considerable district, veined like the leaf of a tree with

the aimless wanderings of many streams, and dotted here and there with

such meres, or marshy lakes, as those of Scoulton and Hingham. It is

even now an oozy plain, but was then a veritable piece of fenland,

where the bitterns boomed among the reeds, the corncrakes creaked, the

great horned owls hooted, and the gulls screamed in unstudied

orchestration. The last bittern—“bog-bumpers” the country-folks called

them—long years ago was gathered into the natural history collections

of rare birds, and the bass-viol bellowings of his voice are no longer

heard after sundown. The great horned owls, too, are no more; but

lesser owls still tu-whoo in the woods, and the screaming gulls of

Scoulton yet startle the stranger as they rise, voiceful, in their

many thousands from the mere.

In 1675, when Ogilby’s “Britannia,” that first, and most magnificent,

survey of the roads, was published, this spot was pictured on his

sketch-plan of this road as “Attleburgh Meer,” and was apparently

something between a bog and a lake. It stretched across the road, and to

a considerable distance on either side. This was in the very year of Sir

Edwin Rich’s death, when his bequest became available, and we may

suppose that this hindrance to travellers was abolished very shortly

afterwards and the monument to his liberality erected here, on the very

spot where that slough had once been.

From its old name of the “Portway,” it is obvious this road must have

been in existence in very ancient times, but it is equally obvious it

was early discarded for other routes, for Ogilby is the earliest

map-maker to mark it, and Will Kemp, who seventy-five years earlier

danced his nine days’ dance from London to Norwich, went the less direct

road to Norwich from Thetford by way of Rockland, Hingham, and Barford

Bridge, which he would not have done had the way through Attleborough

and Wymondham been passable.

Kemp, who was a low comedian, and, according to his own showing, spent

his life in “mad Igges and merry iestes,” wagered he would dance down

all the way, and did so perform the distance in nine days jigging, with

intervals for rest and entertainment in between: not a very difficult

performance, even for that time, and even though it was winter when he

did it. He tells us fully in his “Nine Days’ Wonder” how, accompanied by

his tabourer, or drummer, he skipped and joked the miles away, and gives

the route he took, over Bow Bridge to Romford, Ingatestone, Widford,

Braintree, Sudbury, Long Melford, and Clare, to Bury St. Edmunds. It was

on a Saturday, at the close of his sixth day’s dancing, that he entered

Bury, and there, “by reason of the great snow that then fell,” he stayed

until the following Friday morning, February 29th. The distance between

Bury and Thetford is really twelve miles, and so Kemp does not take full

credit for this day’s performance when he tells us that “Dauncing that

tenne mile in three houres,” and leaving Bury shortly after seven in the

morning, he was at Thetford soon after ten o’clock: “So light was my

heeles that I counted the tenne mile no better than a leape.”

Master Kemp jigged to some profitable purpose, for as many people came

to see him as are attracted by the modern pedestrians who wear out so

much shoe-leather on the classic miles of the Brighton Road; nor were

the county magnates above patronising this Merry Andrew. Thus he

reports, “At my entrance into Thetford the people came in great numbers

to see mee, for there were many there, being Size time. The noble

gentleman, Sir Edwin Rich,[1] gaue mee entertainment in such beautiful

and liberal sort, during my continuance there, Satterday & Sunday, that

I want fitte words to express the least part of his worthy vsage of my

unworthines; and to conclude liberally as hee had begun and continued,

at my departure on Munday his worship gaue mee fiue pound.”

On that Monday Kemp danced to Rockland and Hingham. At Rockland his host

at the inn was a boon companion, but stood a little upon his dignity,

for he would not appear until he had shifted from his working day’s

suit; when, valiantly arrayed, he entered, hat in hand, with “Dear

Master Kemp, you are even as welcome as—as—as—” and so stammering until

he found a comparison—“as the Queen’s best greyhound.”

Footnote 1:

Father of the Sir Edwin, the benefactor.

“After this dogged, yet well-meant salutation,” says Kemp, weakly

punning, “the Carrowses were called in, and they drank long and deep.”

So merry did this convivial interlude make him that, although he was an

extravagantly fat man, he insisted upon dancing off with Kemp; but two

fields sufficed him, and then, breathless, bade his visitor “go—go, in

God’s name.” So they parted. From Thetford to Rockland, Kemp had found

“a foul way,” and onwards to Hingham it was not only foul, but deep, and

no one knew the road. There were twenties and forties, nay, sometimes a

hundred people, in groups, come to see him pass, but of the way to

Norwich they could tell him nothing. “One cried, ‘The fayrest way was

thorow their Village,’ another, ‘This is the nearest and fayrest way,

when you have passed but a myle and a half.’ Another sorte crie, ‘Turn

on the left hand,’ some, ‘On the right hand’”; but with it all he did at

last reach Hingham, and on the next day through Barford Bridge reached

Norwich.

It was a roundabout way, and Kemp would have found more publicity had he

gone through the towns of Attleborough and Wymondham. But the people of

Thetford had probably warned him of the bad way through those places.

Sir Edwin Rich’s £200 probably did not suffice for anything beyond

filling up that ambiguous stretch of watery mud called Attleborough

Mere, and thus we find, twenty-one years later, an early Turnpike Act,

the Act of 1696, 7th and 8th of William and Mary, passed for the repair

of the highways between Wymondham and Attleborough. This road is thus

claimed by Norfolk antiquaries as the first turnpike road to be

constructed in the kingdom, but that is a slight error, for the Act was

passed merely for repair, and was antedated by thirty-three years, in

the first of Turnpike Acts, that of 1663, which provided for the repair

and turnpiking of the road from London to Stilton—the “Old North” and

the “Great North” roads of modern parlance. If, however, we somewhat

limit that claim, and declare this to be the first turnpike road in

Norfolk, we shall probably be correct

XLIII

WYMONDHAM town, to which we now come, stands at the junction of many

roads, and was long a centre, both of religious and trade activity.

Strangers, uninstructed in Norfolk usage, pronounce the name as spelled,

and thereby earn the contempt of those to the manner born, who smile

superior; but when the East Anglian travels into Leicestershire and,

arriving at _that_ Wymondham, calls it, after his own use and wont,

“Windham,” he in turn is made to feel outside the pale, for

Leicestershire folk take full value out of every letter in the name of

their Wymondham. The Windham family, of Felbrigg, near Cromer, who

settled at that place in 1461, came from Wymondham and were possibly

descendants of the Saxon Wymund after whom the town was named.

Wymondham is said to stand higher than the surrounding country, but such

a statement, unilluminated by comparison, might be misleading. You do

not climb exhaustedly up into it, nor in leaving drop sheer down into a

corresponding vale: the difference, in fact, between the levels through

which we have come and the heights we now reach is merely one of inches,

and so slight that only a robust faith can believe in it.

Wymondham was the child of that great Benedictine Priory founded here in

1107, by William d’Albini, chief butler to Henry I., whose son became

first Earl of Arundel, and was the hero of that very tall story which

tells how the Queen Dowager of France fell in love with him when he was

in Paris and offered him marriage. He refused that very flattering

offer, because as a matter of fact he was engaged already to another

distinguished lady; no less an one, indeed, than the widow of Henry I.

“Earth hath no rage like love to hatred turned,” says the poet, and the

rage of the rejected Queen was really a right royal, consuming, and

devastating rage, quite worthy of the second line in that poetic

couplet, which says, “Nor hell a fury like a woman scorned.” She planned

a visit to a lion’s den, conveniently handy to the palace, and, when

there, pretended to be frightened of that fierce beast. D’Albini said it

was nothing, only women would be afraid; whereupon she pushed him into

the den and came away, happy in the thought that if she could not have

him, at least the other woman should not. But she mistook, for D’Albini,

wrapping up his hand in his cloak, put his hand in the lion’s mouth

and—pulled its tongue out! He left it at the palace as a present for the

Queen, and then returned to England, became known as William of the

Strong Hand, married the Dowager Queen of England, and lived happy ever

after. That breed of lion must early have become extinct, for the

exploit has never since been repeated.

The Newmarket, Bury, Thetford and Cromer Road Sport and history on an East Anglian turnpike · 第 12 / 17 段