Mr. LIEBELER. At that time neither one of you were----

Dr. HARTOGS. And they selected me. I mean it was a fantastic thing.

Mr. LIEBELER. It was purely coincidence?

Dr. HARTOGS. Coincidence that they selected me.

Mr. LIEBELER. So you made no reference at that time to the examination

which you had made of Oswald?

Dr. HARTOGS. None at all. I didn't know.

Mr. LIEBELER. Dr. Hartogs, do you have in your possession a copy of the

report which you made at the time you examined Oswald?

Dr. HARTOGS. No.

Mr. LIEBELER. Have you had any opportunity to examine a copy of that

report since the assassination?

Dr. HARTOGS. No.

Mr. LIEBELER. So the recollection that you have given us as regards

your diagnosis and your recommendations is strictly based on your own

independent recollection, plus the reconstruction of your interview

with Oswald from the seminar that you recall having given?

Dr. HARTOGS. Right.

Mr. LIEBELER. Do you remember anything else that particularly impressed

you about Oswald? The FBI report indicates that you were greatly

impressed by the boy, who was only 13-1/2 years old at the time,

because he had extremely cold, steely eyes. Do you remember telling

that to the agents?

Dr. HARTOGS. Yes, yes; that he was not emotional at all; he was in

control of his emotions. He showed a cold, detached outer attitude.

He talked about his situation, about himself in a, what should I say,

nonparticipating fashion. I mean there was nothing emotional, affective

about him, and this impressed me. That was the only thing which I

remembered; yes.

Mr. LIEBELER. Now, you recall also that Oswald was a slender and

pale-faced boy?

Dr. HARTOGS. Yes.

Mr. LIEBELER. Can you remember what particular thing it was about

Oswald that made you conclude that he had this severe personality

disturbance? What led you to this diagnosis?

Dr. HARTOGS. It was his suspiciousness against adults, as far as

I recall, his exquisite sensitivity in dealing with others, their

opinions on his behalf. That is as far as I recall it.

Mr. LIEBELER. Did you form an opinion as to his intellectual ability,

his mental endowment?

Dr. HARTOGS. Yes; but that I don't recall for sure. It was at least

average at that time.

Mr. LIEBELER. I want to mark "Exhibit 1" on the examination of Dr.

Renatus Hartogs, April 16, 1964, in New York, a photostatic copy of a

document entitled "Youth House Psychiatrist's Report," indicating a

report on case No. 26996; date of admission, April 16, 1953, exactly 11

years ago; date of examination, May 1, 1953, with regard to a boy by

the name of Lee Harvey Oswald. I have initialed a copy of this report

for identification purposes, Doctor. Would you initial it here next to

my initials.

(Witness complies.)

(Photostatic copy of document entitled "Youth House Psychiatrist's

Report" marked "Exhibit 1.")

Mr. LIEBELER. Would you read the report and tell us if that is the

report that you prepared at that time?

Dr. HARTOGS. That is right, that is it. Interesting.

Mr. LIEBELER. Doctor, is your recollection refreshed after looking at

the report that you made at that time?

Dr. HARTOGS. Yes, yes; that is the diagnosis, "personality pattern

disturbance with schizoid features and passive-aggressive tendencies."

Yes.

Mr. LIEBELER. On page 1, at the very beginning of the report, you

wrote at that time, did you not, "This 13-year-old, well-built,

well-nourished boy was remanded to Youth House for the first time on

charge of truancy."

Dr. HARTOGS. Yes.

Mr. LIEBELER. On the last page of the report there is a section entitled

"Summary for Probation Officer's Report," is there not?

Dr. HARTOGS. Yes.

Mr. LIEBELER. And you wrote there, about two or three sentences down,

did you not, "We arrive therefore at the recommendation that he should

be placed on probation under the condition that he seek help and

guidance through contact with a child guidance clinic, where he should

be treated preferably by a male psychiatrist who could substitute, to

a certain degree at least, for the lack of father figure. At the same

time, his mother should be urged to seek psychotherapeutic guidance

through contact with a family agency. If this plan does not work

out favorably and Lee cannot cooperate in this treatment plan on an

outpatient basis, removal from the home and placement could be resorted

to at a later date, but it is our definite impression that treatment

on probation should be tried out before the stricter and therefore

possibly more harmful placement approach is applied to the case of this

boy?"

Dr. HARTOGS. Yes. It contradicts my recollection.

Mr. LIEBELER. Yes. As you now read your report--and it is perfectly

understandable that it is something that might not be remembered 11

years after the event; I have no recollection of what I was doing 11

years ago.

Dr. HARTOGS. I did not know that I made this ambiguous recommendation.

Mr. LIEBELER. As you read this report and reflect on this report and

on the boy, Oswald, as he is revealed through it, do you think that

possibly it may have been somebody else that was involved in the

seminar or are you convinced that it was Oswald?

Dr. HARTOGS. No; that was Oswald.

Mr. LIEBELER. That was Oswald?

Dr. HARTOGS. Yes.

Mr. LIEBELER. It would not appear from this report that you found any

indication in the character of Lee Oswald at that time that would

indicate this possible violent outburst, is there?

Dr. HARTOGS. I didn't mention it in the report, and I wouldn't recall

it now.

Mr. LIEBELER. If you would have found it, you would have mentioned it

in the report?

Dr. HARTOGS. I would have mentioned it; yes. I just implied it with the

diagnosis of passive-aggressive. It means that we are dealing here with

a youngster who was hiding behind a seemingly passive, detached facade

aggression hostility. I mean this is what I thought was quite clear. I

did not say that he had assaultive or homicidal potential.

Mr. LIEBELER. And in fact, as we read through the report, there is

no mention of the words "incipient schizophrenic" or "potentially

dangerous" in the report.

Dr. HARTOGS. No; I don't know where she has it from, but these are my

words. I use it in other reports, but here it is not.

Mr. LIEBELER. "Passive-aggressive tendencies" are fairly common in

occurrence, are they not amongst people?

Dr. HARTOGS. No; it is not so common. It is the least common of the

three personality traits. It is either a passive-dependent child or

an aggressive child, and there is a passive-aggressive child. The

passive-aggressive one is the least common.

Mr. LIEBELER. Would you describe for us briefly what the

passive-aggressive tendencies are, how do they manifest themselves,

what do they indicate?

Dr. HARTOGS. They indicate a passive retiring surface facade, under

which the child hides considerable hostility of various degrees.

Mr. LIEBELER. It would indicate to some extent a hiding of hostile

tendencies toward others?

Dr. HARTOGS. Yes. But usually in a passive-aggressive individual the

aggressiveness can be triggered off and provoked in stress situations

or if he nourishes his hate and his hostility for considerable length

of time so that the passive surface facade all of a sudden explodes,

this can happen. I said here that his fantasy life turned around

the topics of omnipotence and power. He said also that "I dislike

everybody," which is quite interesting, I think, also pertinent.

Mr. LIEBELER. You indicated that his mother was interviewed by the

Youth House social worker and is described as such-and-such. That would

indicate, would it not, to you that you personally did not see the

mother?

Dr. HARTOGS. That is right. I did not see the mother personally, but

the information I have from the Youth House social worker's report.

Mr. LIEBELER. You indicated in the second sentence of the summary for

the probation officer's report, "No finding of neurological impairment

or psychotic mental changes could be made," did you not?

Dr. HARTOGS. That is right.

Mr. LIEBELER. What do you mean when you say that "No finding of

psychotic mental changes could be made"?

Dr. HARTOGS. This child was not suffering from delusions and

hallucinations.

Mr. LIEBELER. Would you couple that with the concept of neurological

impairment which indicated no brain damage or anything of that sort

which would cause hallucinations or disturbance of the personality?

Dr. HARTOGS. Yes.

Mr. LIEBELER. Do you remember the circumstances of Oswald's home

environment here in New York at the time he came?

Dr. HARTOGS. No.

Mr. LIEBELER. You have no recollection of that. If I were to tell you

now that this boy came to New York with his mother, his father having

died before he was born, to live with one of his older brothers, and

that they lived with the brother here in Manhattan on 92d Street for a

short time, after which friction developed, and they then moved to the

Bronx, the mother worked all day, to support the child, in a department

store here in New York or in Brooklyn, and the boy apparently found

difficulty in his relations with others at school because he dressed

differently, being from Texas, they lived apparently on the Grand

Concourse, which has been described to us at that time as being a

generally middle-class Jewish neighborhood, in which the boys did not

dress in levis or quite so casually as Oswald did; that he was given

some difficulty because of the fact that he did not speak the way the

people did in New York, he spoke with a southern Texas accent and did

not understand the patois of the city; assuming that those things were

true, would that be a partial explanation, do you think, of the way

that he reacted to you during the interview as reflected in your report?

Dr. HARTOGS. No; I would not say. This was not the personality

disturbance which was the result of the situation of changes or

conditioning; this was more deeper going. A personality pattern

disturbance is a disturbance which has been existing since early

childhood and has continued to exist through the individual's life. It

is not the result of recent conditioning.

Mr. LIEBELER. After reading your report, are you able to form an

opinion or did you form an opinion at that time of what might have

caused this particular personality pattern disturbance in this boy?

Dr. HARTOGS. I mentioned it, I think, in the report, the lack of a

father figure, the lack of a real family life, neglect by self-involved

mother. Yes; I think these are the three factors.

Mr. LIEBELER. After reviewing the report, do you have any other remarks

that you think would be helpful to us in trying to understand what

motivated this boy, assuming that he was the assassin of the President?

Dr. HARTOGS. No.

Mr. LIEBELER. That you haven't already talked about?

Dr. HARTOGS. No.

Mr. LIEBELER. I will ask the reporter to set forth the text of the

report at the end of the deposition. I want to thank you very much for

giving us the time that you have, and on behalf of the Commission we

want to tell you that we appreciate it very much. Thanks very much,

Doctor.

Dr. HARTOGS. Okay.

"This 13 year old, well-built, well-nourished boy was remanded to

Youth House for the first time on charge of truancy from school and of

being beyond the control of his mother as far as school attendance is

concerned. This is his first contact with the law.

"He is--tense, withdrawn and evasive boy who dislikes intensely

talking about himself and his feelings. He likes _the_ give the

impression that he doesn't care about others and rather likes to keep

himself so that he is not bothered and does not have to make the

effort of communicating. It was difficult to penetrate the emotional

wall behind which this boy hides--and he provided us with sufficient

clues, permitting us to see intense anxiety, shyness, feelings of

_awkwardness_ and insecurity as the main reasons for his withdrawal

tendencies and solitary habits. Lee told us: 'I don't want a friend and

I don't like to talk to people.' He describes himself as stubborn and

according to his own saying likes to say 'no.' Strongly resistive and

negativistic features were thus noticed--but psychotic mental content

was denied and no indication of psychotic mental changes was arrived at.

"Lee is a youngster with superior mental endowment functioning

presently on the bright normal range of mental efficiency. His abstract

thinking capacity and his vocabulary are well developed. No retardation

in school subjects could be found in spite of his truancy from school.

Lee limits his interests to reading magazines and looking at the

television all day long. He dislikes to play with others or to face the

learning situation in school. On the other hand he claims that he is

'very poor' in all school subjects and would need remedial help. The

discrepancy between the claims and his actual attainment level show the

low degree of self-evaluation and self-esteem at which this boy has

arrived presently, mainly due to feelings of general inadequacy and

emotional discouragement.

"Lee is the product of a broken home--as his father died before he was

born. Two older brothers are presently in the United States Army--while

the mother supports herself and Lee as an insurance broker. This

occupation makes it impossible for her to provide adequate supervision

of Lee and to make him attend school regularly. Lee is intensely

dissatisfied with his present way of living, but feels that the only

way in which he can avoid feeling too unhappy is to deny to himself

competition with other children or expressing his needs and wants. Lee

claims that he can get very angry at his mother and occasionally has

hit her, particularly when she returns home without having bought food

for supper. On such occasions she leaves it to Lee to prepare some

food with what he can find in the kitchen. He feels that his mother

rejects him and really has never cared very much for him. He expressed

the similar feeling with regard to his brothers who live pretty much

on their own without showing any brotherly interest in him. Lee has

vivid fantasy life, turning around the topics of omnipotence and power,

through which he tries to compensate for his present shortcomings and

frustrations. He did not enjoy being _together_ with other children and

when we asked him whether he prefers the company of boys to _the one_

of girls--he answered--'I dislike everybody.' His occupational goal is

to join the Army. His mother was interviewed by the Youth House social

worker and is described by her as a 'defensive, rigid, self-involved

and intellectually alert' woman who finds it exceedingly difficult to

understand Lee's personality and his withdrawing behavior. She does

not understand that Lee's withdrawal is a form of violent but silent

protest against his neglect by her--and represents his reaction to a

complete absence of any real family life. She seemed to be interested

enough in the welfare of this boy to be willing to seek guidance and

help as regards her own difficulties and her management of Lee.

"Neurological examination remained essentially negative with the

exception of slightly impaired hearing in the left ear, resulting

from a mastoidectomy in 1946. History of convulsions and accidental

injuries to the skull was denied. Family history is negative for mental

disease.

"_Summary for Probation Officer's Report_:

"This 13-year-old, well-built boy, has superior mental resources and

functions only slightly below his capacity level in spite of chronic

truancy from school--which brought him into Youth House. No finding of

neurological impairment or psychotic mental changes could be made. Lee

has to be diagnosed as 'personality pattern disturbance with schizoid

features and passive-aggressive tendencies.' Lee has to be seen as an

emotionally, quite disturbed youngster who suffers under the impact of

really existing emotional isolation and deprivation; lack of affection,

absence of family life and rejection by a self-involved and conflicted

mother. Although Lee denies that he is in need of any _other_ form

of help other than 'remedial' one, we gained the definite impression

that Lee can be reached through contact with an understanding and very

patient psychotherapist and if he could be drawn at the same time into

group psychotherapy. We arrive therefore at the recommendation that he

should be placed on probation under the condition that he seek help and

guidance through contact with a child guidance clinic, where he should

be treated preferably by a male psychiatrist who could substitute,

to a certain degree at least, for the lack of father figure. At the

same time, his mother should be urged to seek psychotherapeutic

guidance through contact with a family agency. If this plan does not

work out favorably and Lee cannot cooperate in this treatment plan

on an out-patient basis, removal from the home and placement could

be resorted to at a later date, but it is our definite impression

that treatment on probation should be tried out before the stricter

and therefore possibly more harmful placement approach is applied to

the case of this boy. The Big Brother movement could be undoubtedly

of tremendous value in this case and Lee should be urged to join the

organized group activities of his community, such as provided by the

PAL or YMCA of his neighborhood."

Warren Commission (08 of 26): Hearings Vol. VIII (of 15) · 第 84 / 275 题