_Thirdly_: Although the successors of these Puritans, I mean our present

Dissenters, do not think fit to observe this day of humiliation; yet,

since it would be very proper in them, upon some occasions, to renounce

in a public manner those principles upon which their predecessors acted;

and it will be more prudent in them to do so, because those very

Puritans, of whom ours are followers, found by experience, that after

they had overturned the Church and state, murdered their King, and were

projecting what they called a kingdom of the saints, they were cheated

of the power and possessions they only panted after, by an upstart sect

of religion that grew out of their own bowels, who subjected them to one

tyrant, while they were endeavouring to set up a thousand.

_Fourthly_: Those who profess to be followers of our Church established,

and yet presume in discourse to justify or excuse that rebellion, and

murder of the King, ought to consider, how utterly contrary all such

opinions are to the doctrine of Christ and his apostles, as well as to

the articles of our Church, and to the preaching and practice of its

true professors for above a hundred years. Of late times, indeed, and I

speak it with grief of heart, we have heard even sermons of a strange

nature; although reason would make one think it a very unaccountable way

of procuring favour under a monarchy, by palliating and lessening the

guilt of those who murdered the best of kings in cold blood, and, for a

time, destroyed the very monarchy itself. Pray God, we may never more

hear such doctrine from the pulpit, nor have it scattered about in

print, to poison the people!

_Fifthly:_ Some general knowledge of this horrid rebellion and murder,

with the consequences they had upon these nations, may be a warning to

our people not to believe a lie, and to mistrust those deluding spirits,

who, under pretence of a purer and more reformed religion, would lead

them from their duty to God and the laws. Politicians may say what they

please, but it is no hard thing at all for the meanest person, who hath

common understanding, to know whether he be well or ill governed. If he

be freely allowed to follow his trade and calling; if he be secure in

his property, and hath the benefit of the law to defend himself against

injustice and oppression; if his religion be different from that of his

country, and the government think fit to tolerate it, (which he may be

very secure of, let it be what it will;) he ought to be fully satisfied,

and give no offence, by writing or discourse, to the worship

established, as the dissenting preachers are too apt to do. But, if he

hath any new visions of his own, it is his duty to be quiet, and possess

them in silence, without disturbing the community by a furious zeal for

making proselytes. This was the folly and madness of those ancient

puritan fanatics: They must needs overturn heaven and earth, violate all

the laws of God and man, make their country a field of blood, to

propagate whatever wild or wicked opinions came into their heads,

declaring all their absurdities and blasphemies to proceed from the Holy

Ghost.

To conclude this head. In answer to that objection of keeping up

animosity and hatred between Protestants, by the observation of this

day; if there be any sect or sort of people among us, who profess the

same principles in religion and government which those puritan rebels

put in practice, I think it is the interest of all those who love the

Church and King, to keep up as strong a party against them as possible,

until they shall, in a body, renounce all those wicked opinions upon

which their predecessors acted, to the disgrace of Christianity, and the

perpetual infamy of the English nation.

When we accuse the Papists of the horrid doctrine, "that no faith ought

to be kept with heretics," they deny it to a man; and yet we justly

think it dangerous to trust them, because we know their actions have

been sometimes suitable to that opinion. But the followers of those who

beheaded the Martyr have not yet renounced their principles; and, till

they do, they may be justly suspected. Neither will the bare name of

Protestants set them right. For surely Christ requires more from us than

a profession of hating Popery, which a Turk or an atheist may do as well

as a Protestant.

If an enslaved people should recover their liberty from a tyrannical

power of any sort, who could blame them for commemorating their

deliverance by a day of joy and thanksgiving? And doth not the

destruction of a Church, a King, and three kingdoms, by the artifices,

hypocrisy, and cruelty of a wicked race of soldiers and preachers, and

other sons of Belial, equally require a solemn time of humiliation?

Especially since the consequences of that bloody scene still continue,

as I have already shewn, in their effects upon us.

Thus I have done with the three heads I proposed to discourse on. But

before I conclude, I must give a caution to those who hear me, that they

may not think I am pleading for absolute unlimited power in any one man.

It is true, all power is from God, and, as the apostle says, "the powers

that be are ordained of God;" but this is in the same sense that all we

have is from God, our food and raiment, and whatever possessions we hold

by lawful means. Nothing can be meant in those, or any other words of

Scripture, to justify tyrannical power, or the savage cruelties of those

heathen emperors who lived in the time of the apostles. And so St Paul

concludes, "The powers that be are ordained of God:" For what? Why, "for

the punishment of evil doers, and the praise, the reward, of them that

do well." There is no more inward value in the greatest emperor, than in

the meanest of his subjects: His body is composed of the same substance,

the same parts, and with the same or greater, infirmities: His education

is generally worse, by flattery, and idleness, and luxury, and those

evil dispositions that early power is apt to give. It is therefore

against common sense, that his private personal interest, or pleasure,

should be put in the balance with the safety of millions, every one of

which is his equal by nature, equal in the sight of God, equally capable

of salvation; and it is for their sakes, not his own, that he is

entrusted with the government over them. He hath as high trust as can

safely be reposed in one man, and, if he discharge it as he ought, he

deserves all the honour and duty that a mortal may be allowed to

receive. His personal failings we have nothing to do with, and errors in

government are to be imputed to his ministers in the state. To what

height those errors may be suffered to proceed, is not the business of

this day, or this place, or of my function, to determine. When

oppressions grow too great and universal to be borne, nature or

necessity may find a remedy. But, if a private person reasonably expects

pardon, upon his amendment, for all faults that are not capital, it

would be a hard condition indeed, not to give the same allowance to a

prince, who must see with other men's eyes, and hear with other men's

ears, which are often wilfully blind and deaf. Such was the condition of

the Martyr, and is so, in some degree, of all other princes. Yet this we

may justly say in defence of the common people, in all civilized

nations, that it must be a very bad government indeed, where the body of

the subjects will not rather choose to live in peace and obedience, than

take up arms on pretence of faults in the administration, unless where

the vulgar are deluded by false preachers to grow fond of new visions

and fancies in religion; which, managed by dexterous men, for sinister

ends of malice, envy, or ambition, have often made whole nations run

mad. This was exactly the case in the whole progress of that great

rebellion, and the murder of King Charles I. But the late Revolution

under the Prince of Orange was occasioned by a proceeding directly

contrary, the oppression and injustice there beginning from the throne:

For that unhappy prince, King James II., did not only invade our laws

and liberties, but would have forced a false religion upon his subjects,

for which he was deservedly rejected, since there could be no other

remedy found, or at least agreed on. But, under the blessed Martyr, the

deluded people would have forced many false religions, not only on their

fellow-subjects, but even upon their sovereign himself, and at the same

time invaded all his undoubted rights; and, because he would not comply,

raised a horrid rebellion, wherein, by the permission of God, they

prevailed, and put their sovereign to death, like a common criminal, in

the face of the world.

Therefore, those who seem to think they cannot otherwise justify the

late Revolution, and the change of the succession, than by lessening the

guilt of the Puritans, do certainly put the greatest affront imaginable

upon the present powers, by supposing any relation, or resemblance,

between that rebellion and the late Revolution; and, consequently, that

the present establishment is to be defended by the same arguments which

those usurpers made use of, who, to obtain their tyranny, trampled under

foot all the laws of both God and man.

One great design of my discourse was to give you warning against running

into either extreme of two bad opinions, with relation to obedience. As

kings are called gods upon earth, so some would allow them an equal

power with God, over all laws and ordinances; and that the liberty, and

property, and life, and religion of the subject, depended wholly upon

the breath of the prince; which, however, I hope was never meant by

those who pleaded for passive obedience. And this opinion hath not been

confined to that party which was first charged with it, but hath

sometimes gone over to the other, to serve many an evil turn of interest

or ambition, who have been as ready to enlarge prerogative, where they

could find their own account, as the highest maintainers of it.

On the other side, some look upon kings as answerable for every mistake

or omission in government, and bound to comply with the most

unreasonable demands of an unquiet faction; which was the case of those

who persecuted the blessed Martyr of this day from his throne to the

scaffold.

Between these two extremes, it is easy, from what hath been said, to

choose a middle; to be good and loyal subjects, yet, according to your

power, faithful assertors of your religion and liberties; to avoid all

broachers and preachers of newfangled doctrines in the Church; to be

strict observers of the laws, which cannot be justly taken from you

without your own consent: In short, "to obey God and the King, and

meddle not with those who are given to change."

Which that you may all do, &c.

ON THE POOR MAN'S CONTENTMENT.

PHILIPPIANS, CHAP. IV. PART OF THE 11TH VERSE.

"I have learned, in whatsoever state I am, therewith to be content"

The holy Scripture is full of expressions to set forth the miserable

condition of man during the whole progress of his life; his weakness,

pride, and vanity; his unmeasurable desires, and perpetual

disappointments; the prevalency of his passions, and the corruptions of

his reason; his deluding hopes, and his real, as well as imaginary,

fears; his natural and artificial wants; his cares and anxieties; the

diseases of his body, and the diseases of his mind; the shortness of his

life; his dread of a future state, with his carelessness to prepare for

it: And the wise men of all ages have made the same reflections.

But all these are general calamities, from which none are excepted; and

being without remedy, it is vain to bewail them. The great question,

long debated in the world, is, whether the rich or the poor are the

least miserable of the two? It is certain, that no rich man ever desired

to be poor, and that most, if not all, poor men, desire to be rich;

whence it may be argued, that, in all appearance, the advantage lieth on

the side of wealth, because both parties agree in preferring it before

poverty. But this reasoning will be found to be false: For, I lay it

down as a certain truth, that God Almighty hath placed all men upon an

equal foot, with respect to their happiness in this world, and the

capacity of attaining their salvation in the next; or, at least, if

there be any difference, it is not to the advantage of the rich and the

mighty. Now, since a great part of those who usually make up our

congregations, are not of considerable station, and many among them of

the lower sort, and since the meaner people are generally and justly

charged with the sin of repining and murmuring at their own condition,

to which, however, their betters axe sufficiently subject (although,

perhaps, for shame, not always so loud in their complaints) I thought it

might be useful to reason upon this point in as plain a manner as I can.

I shall therefore shew, first, that the poor enjoy many temporal

blessings, which are not common to the rich and the great: And,

likewise, that the rich and the great are subject to many temporal

evils, which are not common to the poor.

But here I would not be misunderstood; perhaps there is not a word more

abused than that of the poor, or wherein the world is more generally

mistaken. Among the number of those who beg in our streets, or are

half-starved at home, or languish in prison for debt, there is hardly

one in a hundred who doth not owe his misfortunes to his own laziness,

or drunkenness, or worse vices.

To these he owes those very diseases which often disable him from

getting his bread. Such wretches are deservedly unhappy: They can only

blame themselves; and when we are commanded to have pity on the poor,

these are not understood to be of the number.

It is true, indeed, that sometimes honest, endeavouring men are reduced

to extreme want, even to the begging of alms, by losses, by accidents,

by diseases, and old age, without any fault of their own: But these are

very few in comparison of the other; nor would their support be any

sensible burthen to the public, if the charity of well-disposed persons

were not intercepted by those common strollers, who are most

importunate, and who least deserve it. These, indeed, are properly and

justly called the poor, whom it should be our study to find out and

distinguish, by making them partake, of our superfluity and abundance.

But neither have these anything to do with my present subject; For, by

the poor, I only intend the honest, industrious artificer, the meaner

sort of tradesmen, and the labouring man, who getteth his bread by the

sweat of his brows, in town or country, and who make the bulk of mankind

among us.

_First_: I shall therefore shew, first, that the poor (in the sense I

understand the word) do enjoy many temporal blessings, which are not

common to the rich and great; and likewise, that the rich and great are

subject to many temporal evils, which are not common to the poor.

_Secondly_: From the arguments offered to prove the foregoing head, I

shall draw some observations that may be useful for your practice.

I. As to the first: Health, we know, is generally allowed to be the best

of all earthly possessions, because it is that, without which we can

have no satisfaction in any of the rest. For riches are of no use, if

sickness taketh from us the ability of enjoying them, and power and

greatness are then only a burthen. Now, if we would look for health, it

must be in the humble habitation of the labouring man, or industrious

artificer, who earn their bread by the sweat of their brows, and usually

live to a good old age, with a great degree of strength and vigour.

The refreshment of the body by sleep is another great happiness of the

meaner sort. Their rest is not disturbed by the fear of thieves and

robbers, nor is it interrupted by surfeits of intemperance. Labour and

plain food supply the want of quieting draughts; and the wise man

telleth us, that the sleep of the labouring man is sweet. As to

children, which are certainly accounted of as a blessing, even to the

poor, where industry is not wanting; they are an assistance to honest

parents, instead of being a burthen; they are healthy and strong, and

fit for labour; neither is the father in fear, lest his heir should be

ruined by an unequal match: Nor is he solicitous about his rising in the

world, farther than to be able to get his bread.

The poorer sort are not the objects of general hatred or envy; they have

no twinges of ambition, nor trouble themselves with party quarrels, or

state divisions. The idle rabble, who follow their ambitious leaders in

such cases, do not fall within my description of the poorer sort; for,

it is plain, I mean only the honest industrious poor in town or

country, who are safest in times of public disturbance, in perilous

seasons, and public revolutions, if they will be quiet, and do their

business; for artificers and husbandmen are necessary in all

governments: But in such seasons, the rich are the public mark, because

they are oftentimes of no use, but to be plundered; like some sort of

birds, who are good for nothing, but their feathers; and so fall a prey

to the strongest side.

Let us proceed, on the other side to examine the disadvantages which the

rich and the great lie under, with respect to the happiness of the

present life.

First, then; While health, as we have said, is the general portion of

the lower sort, the gout, the dropsy, the stone, the cholic, and all

other diseases, are continually haunting the palaces of the rich and the

great, as the natural attendants upon laziness and luxury. Neither does

the rich man eat his sumptuous fare with half the appetite and relish,

that even the beggars do the crumbs which fall from his table: But, on

the contrary, he is full of loathing and disgust, or at best of

indifference, in the midst of plenty. Thus their intemperance shortens

their lives, without pleasing their appetites.

Business, fear, guilt, design, anguish, and vexation are continually

buzzing about the curtains of the rich and the powerful, and will hardly

suffer them to close their eyes, unless when they are dosed with the

fumes of strong liquors.

It is a great mistake to imagine that the rich want but few things;

their wants are more numerous, more craving, and urgent, than those of

poorer men: For these endeavour only at the necessaries of life, which

make them happy, and they think no farther: But the desire of power and

wealth is endless, and therefore impossible to be satisfied with any

acquisitions.

If riches were so great a blessing as they are commonly thought, they

would at least have this advantage, to give their owners cheerful hearts

and countenances; they would often stir them up to express their

thankfulness to God, and discover their satisfaction to the world. But,

in fact, the contrary to all this is true. For where are there more

cloudy brows, more melancholy hearts, or more ingratitude to their great

Benefactor, than among those who abound in wealth? And, indeed, it is

natural that it should be so, because those men, who covet things that

are hard to be got, must be hard to please; whereas a small thing maketh

a poor man happy, and great losses cannot befall him.

It is likewise worth considering, how few among the rich have procured

their wealth by just measures; how many owe their fortunes to the sins

of their parents, how many more to their own? If men's titles were to be

tried before a true court of conscience, where false swearing, and a

thousand vile artifices, (that are well known, and can hardly be avoided

in human courts of justice) would avail nothing; how many would be

ejected with infamy and disgrace? How many grow considerable by breach

of trust, by bribery and corruption? How many have sold their religion,

with the rights and liberties of themselves and others, for power and

employments?

And, it is a mistake to think, that the most hardened sinner, who oweth

his possessions or titles to any such wicked arts of thieving, can have

true peace of mind, under the reproaches of a guilty conscience, and

amid the cries of ruined widows and orphans.

I know not one real advantage that the rich have over the poor, except

the power of doing good to others. But this is an advantage which God

hath not given wicked men the grace to make use of. The wealth acquired

by evil means was never employed to good ends; for that would be to

divide the kingdom of Satan against itself. Whatever hath been gained by

fraud, avarice, oppression, and the like, must be preserved and

increased by the same methods.

I shall add but one thing more upon this head, which I hope will

convince you, that God (whose thoughts are not as our thoughts) never

intended riches or power to be necessary for the happiness of mankind in

this life; because it is certain, that there is not one single good

quality of the mind absolutely necessary to obtain them, where men are

resolved to be rich at any rate; neither honour, justice, temperance,

wisdom, religion, truth, or learning; for a slight acquaintance of the

world will inform us, that there have been many instances of men, in all

ages, who have arrived at great possessions and great dignities, by

cunning, fraud, or flattery, without any of these, or any other virtues

that can be named. Now, if riches and greatness were such blessings,

that good men without them could not have their share of happiness in

this life; how cometh it to pass, that God should suffer them to be

often dealt to the worst, and most profligate of mankind; that they

should be generally procured by the most abominable means, and applied

to the basest and most wicked uses? This ought not to be conceived of a

just, a merciful, a wise, and Almighty Being. We must therefore

conclude, that wealth and power are in their own nature, at best, but

things indifferent, and that a good man may be equally happy without

them, provided that he hath a sufficiency of the common blessings of

human life to answer all the reasonable and virtuous demands of nature,

which his industry will provide, and sobriety will prevent his wanting.

Agur's prayer, with the reasons of his wish, are full to this purpose:

"Give me neither poverty nor riches. Feed me with food convenient for

me; lest I be full and deny thee, and say, 'Who is the Lord?' Or, lest I

be poor, and steal, and take the name of my God in vain."

From what hath been said, I shall, in the second place, offer some

considerations, that may be useful for your practice.

And here I shall apply myself chiefly to those of the lower sort, for

whose comfort and satisfaction this discourse is principally intended.

For, having observed the great sin of those, who do not abound in

wealth, to be that of murmuring and repining, that God hath dealt his

blessings unequally to the sons of men, I thought it would be of great

use to remove out of your minds so false and wicked an opinion, by

shewing that your condition is really happier than most of you imagine.

The Prose Works of Jonathan Swift, D.D. — Volume 04 Swift's Writings on Religion and the Church — Volume 2 · 第 16 / 23 段