Marriage is a trap which nature sets for us. [1]

[Footnote 1: _Translator's Note_.--Also in French.]

* * * * *

Poets and philosophers who are married men incur by that very fact the

suspicion that they are looking to their own welfare, and not to the

interests of science and art.

* * * * *

Habit is everything. Hence to be calm and unruffled is merely to

anticipate a habit; and it is a great advantage not to need to form

it.

* * * * *

"Personality is the element of the greatest happiness." Since _pain_

and _boredom_ are the two chief enemies of human happiness, nature has

provided our personality with a protection against both. We can

ward off pain, which is more often of the mind than of the body, by

_cheerfulness_; and boredom by _intelligence_. But neither of these

is akin to the other; nay, in any high degree they are perhaps

incompatible. As Aristotle remarks, genius is allied to melancholy;

and people of very cheerful disposition are only intelligent on the

surface. The better, therefore, anyone is by nature armed against one

of these evils, the worse, as a rule, is he armed against the other.

There is no human life that is free from pain and boredom; and it is a

special favour on the part of fate if a man is chiefly exposed to the

evil against which nature has armed him the better; if fate, that is,

sends a great deal of pain where there is a very cheerful temper in

which to bear it, and much leisure where there is much intelligence,

but not _vice versâ_. For if a man is intelligent, he feels pain

doubly or trebly; and a cheerful but unintellectual temper finds

solitude and unoccupied leisure altogether unendurable.

* * * * *

In the sphere of thought, absurdity and perversity remain the masters

of this world, and their dominion is suspended only for brief periods.

Nor is it otherwise in art; for there genuine work, seldom found

and still more seldom appreciated, is again and again driven out by

dullness, insipidity, and affectation.

It is just the same in the sphere of action. Most men, says Bias, are

bad. Virtue is a stranger in this world; and boundless egoism, cunning

and malice, are always the order of the day. It is wrong to deceive

the young on this point, for it will only make them feel later on that

their teachers were the first to deceive them. If the object is

to render the pupil a better man by telling him that others are

excellent, it fails; and it would be more to the purpose to say: Most

men are bad, it is for you to be better. In this way he would, at

least, be sent out into the world armed with a shrewd foresight,

instead of having to be convinced by bitter experience that his

teachers were wrong.

All ignorance is dangerous, and most errors must be dearly paid. And

good luck must he have that carries unchastised an error in his head

unto his death.[1]

[Footnote 1: _Translator's Note_.--This, again, is Schopenhauer's own

English.]

* * * * *

Every piece of success has a doubly beneficial effect upon us when,

apart from the special and material advantage which it brings it is

accompanied by the enlivening assurance that the world, fate, or the

daemon within, does not mean so badly with us, nor is so opposed to

our prosperity as we had fancied; when, in fine, it restores our

courage to live.

Similarly, every misfortune or defeat has, in the contrary sense, an

effect that is doubly depressing.

* * * * *

If we were not all of us exaggeratedly interested in ourselves, life

would be so uninteresting that no one could endure it.

* * * * *

Everywhere in the world, and under all circumstances, it is only by

force that anything can be done; but power is mostly in bad hands,

because baseness is everywhere in a fearful majority.

* * * * *

Why should it be folly to be always intent on getting the greatest

possible enjoyment out of the moment, which is our only sure

possession? Our whole life is no more than a magnified present, and in

itself as fleeting.

* * * * *

As a consequence of his individuality and the position in which he

is placed, everyone without exception lives in a certain state of

limitation, both as regards his ideas and the opinions which he forms.

Another man is also limited, though not in the same way; but should

he succeed in comprehending the other's limitation he can confuse

and abash him, and put him to shame, by making him feel what his

limitation is, even though the other be far and away his superior.

Shrewd people often employ this circumstance to obtain a false and

momentary advantage.

* * * * *

The only genuine superiority is that of the mind and character; all

other kinds are fictitious, affected, false; and it is good to

make them feel that it is so when they try to show off before the

superiority that is true.[1]

[Footnote 1: _Translator's Note_.--In the original this also is in

French.]

* * * * *

_All the world's a stage,

And all the men and women merely players_.

Exactly! Independently of what a man really is in himself, he has

a part to play, which fate has imposed upon him from without, by

determining his rank, education, and circumstances. The most immediate

application of this truth appears to me to be that in life, as on

the stage, we must distinguish between the actor and his part;

distinguish, that is, the man in himself from his position and

reputation--- from the part which rank and circumstances have imposed

upon him. How often it is that the worst actor plays the king, and the

best the beggar! This may happen in life, too; and a man must be very

_crude_ to confuse the actor with his part.

* * * * *

Our life is so poor that none of the treasures of the world can make

it rich; for the sources of enjoyment are soon found to be all very

scanty, and it is in vain that we look for one that will always flow.

Therefore, as regards our own welfare, there are only two ways in

which we can use wealth. We can either spend it in ostentatious pomp,

and feed on the cheap respect which our imaginary glory will bring us

from the infatuated crowd; or, by avoiding all expenditure that will

do us no good, we can let our wealth grow, so that we may have a

bulwark against misfortune and want that shall be stronger and better

every day; in view of the fact that life, though it has few delights,

is rich in evils.

* * * * *

It is just because our real and inmost being is _will_ that it is only

by its exercise that we can attain a vivid consciousness of existence,

although this is almost always attended by pain. Hence it is that

existence is essentially painful, and that many persons for whose

wants full provision is made arrange their day in accordance with

extremely regular, monotonous, and definite habits. By this means they

avoid all the pain which the movement of the will produces; but, on

the other hand, their whole existence becomes a series of scenes and

pictures that mean nothing. They are hardly aware that they exist.

Nevertheless, it is the best way of settling accounts with life, so

long as there is sufficient change to prevent an excessive feeling of

boredom. It is much better still if the Muses give a man some worthy

occupation, so that the pictures which fill his consciousness have

some meaning, and yet not a meaning that can be brought into any

relation with his will.

* * * * *

A man is _wise_ only on condition of living in a world full of fools.

The Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer; the Art of Controversy · 第 54 / 55 题