I know not which to guess thee, man or God.

Now when I set before my eyes the brave achievements of Thrasybulus and

Pelopidas, of Aristides engaged at Plataea and Miltiades at Marathon,

I am here constrained with Herodotus to declare it my opinion, that

in an active state of life the pleasure far exceeds the glory. And

Epaminondas herein bears me witness also, when he saith (as is

reported of him), that the greatest satisfaction he ever received in

his life was that his father and mother had lived to see the trophy

set up at Leuctra when himself was general. Let us then compare

with Epaminondas’s Epicurus’s mother, rejoicing that she had lived

to see her son cooping himself up in a little garden, and getting

children in common with Polyaenus upon the strumpet of Cyzicus. As

for Metrodorus’s mother and sister, how extravagantly rejoiced they

were at his nuptials appears by the letters he wrote to his brother

in answer to his; that is, out of his own books. Nay, they tell us

bellowing that they have not only lived a life of pleasure, but also

exult and sing hymns in the praise of their own living. Now, when our

servants celebrate the festivals of Saturn or go in procession at the

time of the rural bacchanals, you would scarcely brook the hollowing

and din they make, should the intemperateness of their joy and their

insensibleness of decorum make them act and speak such things as these:

Lean down, boy! why dost sit! let’s tope like mad!

Here’s belly-timber store; ne’er spare it, lad.

Straight these huzza like wild. One fills up drink;

Another plaits a wreath, and crowns the brink

O’ th’ teeming bowl. Then to the verdant bays

All chant rude carols in Apollo’s praise;

While one his door with drunken fury smites,

Till he from bed his pretty consort frights.

And are not Metrodorus’s words something like to these when he writes

to his brother thus: It is none of our business to preserve the Greeks,

or to get them to bestow garlands upon us for our wit, but to eat well

and drink good wine, Timocrates, so as not to offend but pleasure our

stomachs. And he saith again, in some other place in the same epistles:

How gay and how assured was I, when I had once learned of Epicurus

the true way of gratifying my stomach; for, believe me, philosopher

Timocrates, our prime good lies at the stomach.

17. In brief, these men draw out the dimensions of their pleasures

like a circle, about the stomach as a centre. And the truth is, it is

impossible for those men ever to participate of generous and princely

joy, such as enkindles a height of spirit in us and sends forth to all

mankind an unmade hilarity and calm serenity, that have taken up a sort

of life that is confined, unsocial, inhuman, and uninspired towards

the esteem of the world and the love of mankind. For the soul of man

is not an abject, little, and ungenerous thing, nor doth it extend its

desires (as polyps do their claws) unto eatables only,—yea, these are

in an instant of time taken off by the least plenitude,—but when its

efforts towards what is brave and generous and the honors and caresses

that accrue therefrom are now in their consummate vigor, this life’s

duration cannot limit them, but the desire of glory and the love of

mankind grasp at whole eternity, and wrestle with such actions and

charms as bring with them an ineffable pleasure, and such as good men,

though never so fain, cannot decline, they meeting and accosting them

on all sides and surrounding them about, while their being beneficial

to many occasions joy to themselves.

As he passes through the throngs in the city,

All gaze upon him as some Deity.[148]

For he that can so affect and move other men as to fill them with joy

and rapture, and to make them long to touch him and salute him, cannot

but appear even to a blind man to possess and enjoy very extraordinary

satisfactions in himself. And hence it comes that such men are both

indefatigable and undaunted in serving the public, and we still hear

some such words from them:

Thy father got thee for the common good;

and

Let’s not give off to benefit mankind.

But what need I instance in those that are consummately good? For if

to one of the middling rank of bad men, when he is just a dying, he

that hath the power over him (whether his God or prince) should but

allow one hour more, upon condition that, after he hath spent that

either in some generous action or in sensual enjoyment, he should then

presently die, who would in this time choose rather to accompany with

Lais or drink Ariusian wine, than to despatch Archias and restore the

Thebans to their liberties? For my part I believe none would. For I

see that even common sword-players, if they are not utter brutes and

savages, but Greek born, when they are to enter the list, though there

be many and very costly dishes set before them, yet take more content

in employing their time in commending their poor wives to some of

their friends, yea, and in conferring freedom on their slaves, than

in gratifying their stomachs. But should the pleasures of the body be

allowed to have some extraordinary matter in them, this would yet be

common to men of action and business.

Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 2 (of 5) · 第 67 / 147 题