A BITTER RETROSPECT

When now, after two years, I realize everything in retrospect, I say to

myself that I realized too late that there was no place for me in a

system which for years has lived only on tradition and routine, and

which tolerates only representatives who report what one wants to read.

Absence of prejudice and an independent judgment are combated, want of

ability and of character are extolled and esteemed, but successes arouse

hostility and uneasiness.

I had abandoned opposition to our mad Triple Alliance policy, because I

saw that it was useless and that my warnings were represented as

Austrophobia and an idée fixe. In a policy which is not mere gymnastics,

or playing with documents, but the conduct of the business of the firm,

there is no such thing as likes and dislikes; there is nothing but the

interest of the community; but a policy which is based merely upon

Austrians, Magyars, and Turks must end in hostility to Russia, and

ultimately lead to a catastrophe.

In spite of former aberrations, everything was still possible in July,

1914. Agreement with England had been reached. We should have had to

send to Petersburg a representative who, at any rate, reached the

average standard of political ability, and we should have had to give

Russia the certainty that we desired neither to dominate the Starits nor

to throttle the Serbs. M. Sazonoff was saying to us: "Lâchez l'Autriche

et nous lâcherons les Français," and M. Cambon [French Ambassador in

Berlin] said to Herr von Jagow: "Vous n'avez [pas] besoin de suivre

l'Autriche partout."

We needed neither alliances nor wars, but merely treaties which would

protect us and others, and which would guarantee us an economic

development for which there had been no precedent in history. And if

Russia had been relieved of trouble in the west, she would have been

able to turn again to the east, and then the Anglo-Russian antagonism

would have arisen automatically without our interference--and the

Russo-Japanese antagonism no less than the Anglo-Russian.

We could also have approached the question of limitation of armaments,

and should have had no further need to bother about the confusions of

Austria. Austria-Hungary would then become the vassal of the German

Empire--without an alliance, and, above all, without sentimental

services on our part, leading ultimately to war for the liberation of

Poland and the destruction of Serbia, although German interests demanded

exactly the contrary.

I had to support in London a policy which I knew to be fallacious. I was

punished for it, for it was a sin against the Holy Ghost.

Current History: A Monthly Magazine of the New York Times, May 1918 Vol. VIII, Part I, No. 2 · 第 376 / 400 题