TURKEY, RUSSIA, ITALY

Instead of uniting with Russia on the basis of the independence of the

Sultan, whom the Russians also did not wish to drive out of

Constantinople, and confining ourselves to economic interests in the

East, while at the same time refraining from all military and political

interference and being satisfied with a division of Asia Minor into

spheres of interest, the goal of our political ambition was to dominate

in the Bosporus. In Russia, therefore, the opinion arose that the way to

Constantinople and to the Mediterranean lay through Berlin. Instead of

encouraging a powerful development in the Balkan States, which were once

free and are very different from the Russians, of which fact we have

already had experience, we placed ourselves on the side of the Turkish

and Magyar oppressors. The dire mistake of our Triple Alliance and our

Eastern policies, which drove Russia--our natural friend and best

neighbor--into the arms of France and England, and kept her from her

policy of Asiatic expansion, was the more evident, as a Franco-Russian

attack, the only hypothesis justifying a Triple Alliance policy, had to

be eliminated from our calculations.

As to the value of the alliance with Italy, one word only. Italy needs

our money and our tourists after the war, with or without our alliance.

That our alliance would go by the board in the event of war was to be

foreseen. The alliance, consequently, was worthless.

Austria, however, needed our protection both in war and peace, and had

no other point d'appui. This dependence on us is based on political,

national, and economic grounds, and is all the greater in proportion to

the intimacy of our relations with Russia. This was proved in the

Bosnian crisis. Since Count Beust, no Vienna Minister had been so

self-conscious with us as Count Aehrenthal was during the last years of

his life. Under the influence of a properly conducted German policy

which would keep us in touch with Russia, Austria-Hungary is our vassal,

and is tied to us even without an alliance and without reciprocal

services; under the influence of a misguided policy, however, we are

tied to Austria-Hungary. An alliance would therefore be purposeless.

I know Austria far too well not to know that a return to the policy of

Count Felix Schwarzenberg or to that of Count Moritz Esterhazy was

unthinkable. Little as the Slavs living there love us, they wish just as

little for a return to the German Kaiserdom, even with a

Hapsburg-Lorraine at its head. They are striving for an internal

Austrian federation on a national basis, a condition which is even less

likely of realization within the German Empire than under the Double

Eagle. Austro-Germans look on Berlin as the centre of German power and

Kultur, and they know that Austria can never be a leading power. They

desire as close a connection as possible with the empire, but not to the

extent of an anti-German policy.

Current History: A Monthly Magazine of the New York Times, May 1918 Vol. VIII, Part I, No. 2 · 第 344 / 400 题