THE MOROCCO QUESTION

Our obscure policy in Morocco had repeatedly caused distrust of our

peaceful intention, or, at least, had raised doubts as to whether we

knew what we wanted or whether our intention was to keep Europe in a

state of suspense and, on occasion, to humiliate the French. An Austrian

colleague, who was a long time in Paris, said to me: "The French had

begun to forget la révanche. You have regularly reminded them of it by

tramping on their toes." After we had declined Delcassé's offer to come

to an agreement regarding Morocco, and then solemnly declared that we

had no political interest there--an attitude which agreed with

Bismarckian political conditions--we suddenly discovered in Abdul Aziz a

Kruger Number Two. To him also, as to the Boers, we promised the

protection of the mighty German Empire, and with the same result. Both

manifestations concluded, as they were bound to conclude, with a

retraction, if we were not prepared to start a world war. The pitiable

conference of Algeciras could alter nothing, and still less cause

Delcassé's fall. Our attitude furthered the Russo-Japanese and

Russo-British rapprochement. In face of "the German peril" all other

considerations faded into the background. The possibility of another

Franco-German war had been patent, and, as had not been the case in

1870, such a war could not leave out Russia or England.

Current History: A Monthly Magazine of the New York Times, May 1918 Vol. VIII, Part I, No. 2 · 第 340 / 400 题