OUR VERDICT DELIBERATE

I call you to witness, my fellow-countrymen, that at no stage of this

terrible business have I judged the purposes of Germany intemperately. I

should be ashamed in the presence of affairs so grave, so fraught with

the destinies of mankind throughout all the world, to speak with

truculence, to use the weak language of hatred or vindictive purpose. We

must judge as we would be judged. I have sought to learn the objects

Germany has in this war from the mouths of her own spokesmen, and to

deal as frankly with them as I wished them to deal with me. I have laid

bare our own ideals, our own purposes, without reserve or doubtful

phrase, and have asked them to say as plainly what it is that they seek.

We have ourselves proposed no injustice, no aggression. We are ready,

whenever the final reckoning is made, to be just to the German people,

deal fairly with the German power, as with all others. There can be no

difference between peoples in the final judgment, if it is indeed to be

a righteous judgment. To propose anything but justice, even-handed and

dispassionate justice, to Germany at any time, whatever the outcome of

the war, would be to renounce and dishonor our own cause, for we ask

nothing that we are not willing to accord.

It has been with this thought that I have sought to learn from those who

spoke for Germany whether it was justice or dominion and the execution

of their own will upon the other nations of the world that the German

leaders were seeking. They have answered--answered in unmistakable

terms. They have avowed that it was not justice, but dominion and the

unhindered execution of their own will.

Current History: A Monthly Magazine of the New York Times, May 1918 Vol. VIII, Part I, No. 2 · 第 193 / 400 题