LETTER I.

PARIS, September, 1805.

MY LORD:--Since my return here, I have never neglected to present myself

before our Sovereign, on his days of grand reviews and grand diplomatic

audiences. I never saw him more condescending, more agreeable, or, at

least, less offensive, than on the day of his last levee, before he set

out to be inaugurated a King of Italy; nor worse tempered, more petulant,

agitated, abrupt, and rude than at his first grand audience after his

arrival from Milan, when this ceremony had been performed. I am not the

only one who has made this remark; he did not disguise either his good or

ill-humour; and it was only requisite to have eyes and ears to see and be

disgusted at the difference of behaviour.

I have heard a female friend of Madame Bonaparte explain, in part, the

cause of this alteration. Just before he set out for Italy, the

agreeable news of the success of the first Rochefort squadron in the West

Indies, and the escape of our Toulon fleet from the vigilance of your

Lord Nelson, highly elevated his spirits, as it was the first naval

enterprise of any consequence since his reign. I am certain that one

grand naval victory would flatter his vanity and ambition more than all

the glory of one of his most brilliant Continental campaigns. He had

also, at that time, great expectations that another negotiation with

Russia would keep the Continent submissive under his dictature, until he

should find an opportunity of crushing your power. You may be sure that

he had no small hopes of striking a blow in your country, after the

junction of our fleet with the Spanish, not by any engagement between our

Brest fleet and your Channel fleet, but under a supposition that you

would detach squadrons to the East and West Indies in search of the

combined fleet, which, by an unexpected return, according to orders,

would have then left us masters of the Channel, and, if joined with the

Batavian fleet, perhaps even of the North Sea. By the incomprehensible

activity of Lord Nelson, and by the defeat (or as we call it here, the

negative victory) of Villeneuve and Gravina, all this first prospect had

vanished. Our vengeance against a nation of shopkeepers we were not only

under the necessity of postponing, but, from the unpolite threats and

treaties of the Cabinet of St. Petersburg with those of Vienna and St.

James, we were on the eve of a Continental war, and our gunboats, instead

of being useful in carrying an army to the destruction of the tyrants of

the seas, were burdensome, as an army was necessary to guard them, and to

prevent these tyrants from capturing or destroying them. Such changes,

in so short a period of time as three months, might irritate a temper

less patient than that of Napoleon the First.

At his grand audience here, even after the army, of England had moved

towards Germany, when the die was cast, and his mind should, therefore,

have been made up, he was almost insupportable. The low bows, and the

still humbler expressions of the Prussian Ambassador, the Marquis da

Lucchesini, were hardly noticed; and the Saxon Ambassador, Count von

Buneau, was addressed in a language that no well-bred master ever uses in

speaking to a menial servant. He did not cast a look, or utter a word,

that was not an insult to the audience and a disgrace to his rank. I

never before saw him vent his rage and disappointment so

indiscriminately. We were, indeed (if I may use the term), humbled and

trampled upon en masse. Some he put out of countenance by staring

angrily at them; others he shocked by his hoarse voice and harsh words;

and all--all of us--were afraid, in our turn, of experiencing something

worse than our neighbours. I observed more than one Minister, and more

than one general, change colour, and even perspire, at His Majesty’s

approach.

I believe the members of the foreign diplomatic corps here will all agree

with me that, at a future congress, the restoration of the ancient and

becoming etiquette of the Kings of France would be as desirable a point

to demand from the Emperor of the French as the restoration of the

balance of power.

Before his army of England quitted its old quarters on the coast, the

officers and men often felt the effects of his ungovernable temper. When

several regiments of grenadiers, of the division of Oudinot, were

defiling before him on the 25th of last month, he frequently and

severely, though without cause, reprobated their manner of marching, and

once rode up to Captain Fournois, pushed him forwards with the point of a

small cane, calling out, “Sacre Dieu! Advance; you walk like a turkey.”

In the first moment of indignation, the captain, striking at the cane

with his sword, made a push, or a gesture, as if threatening the person

of Bonaparte, who called out to his aide-de-camp, Savary:

“Disarm the villain, and arrest him!”

“It is unnecessary,” the captain replied, “I have served a tyrant, and

merit my fate!” So saying, he passed his sword through his heart.

His whole company stopped instantly, as at a word of command, and a

general murmur was heard.

“Lay down your arms, and march out of the file instantly,” commanded

Bonaparte, “or you shall be cut down for your mutiny by my guides.”

They hesitated for a moment, but the guides advancing to surround them,

they obeyed, and were disarmed. On the following afternoon, by a special

military commission, each tenth man was condemned to be shot; but

Bonaparte pardoned them upon condition of serving for life in the

colonies; and the whole company was ordered to the colonial depots. The

widow and five children of Captain Fournois the next morning threw

themselves at the Emperor’s feet, presenting a petition, in which they

stated that the pay of the captain had been their only support.

“Well,” replied Bonaparte to the kneeling petitioners, “Fournois was both

a fool and a traitor; but, nevertheless, I will take care of you.”

Indeed, they have been so well taken care of that nobody knows what has

become of them.

I am almost certain that I am not telling you what you did not know

beforehand in informing you that the spirit of our troops is greatly

different from that of the Germans, and even from that of your own

country. Every, one of our soldiers would prefer being shot to being

beaten or caned. Flogging, with us, is out of the question. It may,

perhaps, be national vanity, but I am doubtful whether any other army is,

or can be, governed, with regard to discipline, in a less violent and

more delicate manner, and, nevertheless, be kept in subordination, and

perform the most brilliant exploits. Remember, I speak of our spirit of

subordination and discipline, and not of our character as citizens, as

patriots, or as subjects. I have often hinted it, but I believe I have

not explained myself so fully before; but my firm opinion and persuasion

is that, with regard to our loyalty, our duty, and our moral and

political principles, another equally inconsistent and despicable people

does not exist in the universe.

The condition of the slave is certainly in itself that of vileness; but

is that slave a vile being who, for a blow, pierces his bosom because he

is unable to avenge it? And what epithet can be given him who braves

voluntarily a death seemingly certain, not from the love of his country,

but from a principle of honour, almost incompatible with the dishonour of

bondage?

During the siege of Yorktown, in America, we had, during one night,

erected a battery, with intent to blow up a place which, according to the

report of our spies, was your magazine of ammunition, etc. We had not

time to finish it before daylight; but one loaded twenty-four pounder was

mounted, and our cannoneer, the moment he was about to fire it, was

killed. Six more of our men, in the same attempt, experienced the same

fate. My regiment constituted the advanced guard nearest to the spot,

and La Fayette brought me the order from the commander-in-chief to engage

some of my men upon that desperate undertaking. I spoke to them, and two

advanced, but were both instantly shot by your sharpshooters. I then

looked at my grenadiers, without uttering anything, when, to my sorrow,

one of my best and most orderly men advanced, saying, “My colonel, permit

me to try my fortune!” I assented, and he went coldly amidst hundreds of

bullets whistling around his ears, set fire to the cannon, which blew up

a depot of powder, as was expected, and in the confusion returned unhurt.

La Fayette then presented him with his purse. “No, monsieur,” replied

he, “money did not make me venture upon such a perilous undertaking.” I

understood my man, promoted him to a sergeant, and recommended him to

Rochambeau, who, in some months, procured him the commission of a

sub-lieutenant. He is now one of Bonaparte’s Field-marshals, and the

only one of that rank who has no crimes to reproach himself with. This

man was the soldier of a despot; but was not his action that of a man of

honour, which a stanch republican of ancient Rome would have been proud

of? Who can explain this contradiction?

This anecdote about Fournois I heard General Savary relate at Madame

Duchatel’s, as a proof of Bonaparte’s generosity and clemency, which, he

affirmed, excited the admiration of the whole camp at Boulogne. I do not

suppose this officer to be above thirty years of age, of which he has

passed the first twenty-five in orphan-houses or in watch-houses; but no

tyrant ever had a more cringing slave, or a more abject courtier. His

affectation to extol everything that Bonaparte does, right or wrong, is

at last become so habitual that it is naturalized, and you may mistake

for sincerity that which is nothing but imposture or flattery. This son

of a Swiss porter is now one of Bonaparte’s adjutants-general, a colonel

of the Gendarmes d’Elite, a general of brigade in the army, and a

commander of the Legion of Honour; all these places he owes, not to

valour or merit, but to abjectness, immorality, and servility. When an

aide-de-camp with Bonaparte in Egypt, he served him as a spy on his

comrades and on the officers of the staff, and was so much detested that,

near Aboukir, several shots were fired at him in his tent by his own

countrymen. He is supposed still to continue the same espionage; and as

a colonel of the Gendarmes d’Elite, he is charged with the secret

execution of all proscribed persons or State prisoners, who have been

secretly condemned,--a commission that a despot gives to a man he trusts,

but dares not offer to a man he esteems. He is so well known that the

instant he enters a society silence follows, and he has the whole

conversation to himself. This he is stupid enough to take for a

compliment, or for a mark of respect, or an acknowledgment of his

superior parts and intelligence, when, in fact, it is a direct reproach

with which prudence arms itself against suspected or known dishonesty.

Besides his wife, he has to support six other women whom he has seduced

and ruined; and, notwithstanding the numerous opportunities his master

has procured him of pillaging and enriching himself, he is still much in

debt; but woe to his creditors were they indiscreet enough to ask for

their payments! The Secret Tribunal would soon seize them and transport

them, or deliver them over to the hands of their debtor, to be shot as

traitors or conspirators.

Memoirs of the Court of St. Cloud (Being secret letters from a gentleman at Paris to a nobleman in London) — Complete · 第 65 / 107 题