LETTER XXIV.

PARIS, August, 1805.

MY LORD:--You have perhaps heard that Napoleon Bonaparte, with all his

brothers and sisters, was last Christmas married by the Pope according to

the Roman Catholic rite, being previously only united according to the

municipal laws of the French Republic, which consider marriage only as a

civil contract. During the last two months of His Holiness’s residence

here, hardly a day passed that he was not petitioned to perform the same

ceremony for our conscientious grand functionaries and courtiers, which

he, however, according to the Emperor’s desire, declined. But his

Cardinals were not under the same restrictions, and to an attentive

observer who has watched the progress of the Revolution and not lost

sight of its actors, nothing could appear more ridiculous, nothing could

inspire more contempt of our versatility and inconsistency, than to

remark among the foremost to demand the nuptial benediction, a

Talleyrand, a Fouche, a Real, an Augereau, a Chaptal, a Reubel, a Lasnes,

a Bessieres, a Thuriot, a Treilhard, a Merlin, with a hundred other

equally notorious revolutionists, who were, twelve or fifteen years ago,

not only the first to declaim against religious ceremonies as ridiculous,

but against religion itself as useless, whose motives produced, and whose

votes sanctioned, those decrees of the legislature which proscribed the

worship, together with its priests and sectaries. But then the fashion of

barefaced infidelity was as much the order of the day as that of external

sanctity is at present. I leave to casuists the decision whether to the

morals of the people, naked atheism, exposed with all its deformities, is

more or less hurtful than concealed atheism, covered with the garb of

piety; but for my part I think the noonday murderer less guilty and much

less detestable than the midnight assassin who stabs in the dark.

A hundred anecdotes are daily related of our new saints and fashionable

devotees. They would be laughable were they not scandalous, and

contemptible did they not add duplicity to our other vices.

Bonaparte and his wife go now every morning to hear Mass, and on every

Sunday or holiday they regularly attend at vespers, when, of course, all

those who wish to be distinguished for their piety or rewarded for their

flattery never neglect to be present. In the evening of last Christmas

Day, the Imperial chapel was, as usual, early crowded in expectation of

Their Majesties, when the chamberlain, Salmatoris, entered, and said to

the captain of the guard, loud enough to be heard by the audience, “The

Emperor and the Empress have just resolved not to come here to-night, His

Majesty being engaged by some unexpected business, and the Empress not

wishing to come without her consort.” In ten minutes the chapel was

emptied of every person but the guards, the priests, and three old women

who had nowhere else to pass an hour. At the arrival of our Sovereigns,

they were astonished at the unusual vacancy, and indignantly regarded

each other. After vespers were over, one of Bonaparte’s spies informed

him of the cause, when, instead of punishing the despicable and

hypocritical courtiers, or showing them any signs of his displeasure, he

ordered Salmatoris under arrest, who would have experienced a complete

disgrace had not his friend Duroc interfered and made his peace.

At another time, on a Sunday, Fouche entered the chapel in the midst of

the service, and whispered to Bonaparte, who immediately beckoned to his

lord-in-waiting and to Duroc. These both left the Imperial chapel, and

returning in a few minutes at the head of five grenadiers, entered the

grand gallery, generally frequented by the most scrupulous devotees, and

seized every book. The cause of this domiciliary visit was an anonymous

communication received by the Minister of Police, stating that libels

against the Imperial family, bound in the form of Prayer-books, had been

placed there. No such libels were, however, found; but of one hundred

and sixty pretended breviaries, twenty-eight were volumes of novels,

sixteen were poems, and eleven were indecent books. It is not necessary

to add that the proprietors of these edifying works never reclaimed them.

The opinions are divided here, whether this curious discovery originated

in the malice of Fouche, or whether Talleyrand took this method of duping

his rival, and at the same time of gratifying his own malignity. Certain

it is that Fouche was severely reprimanded for the transaction, and that

Bonaparte was highly offended at the disclosure.

The common people, and the middle classes, are neither so ostentatiously

devout, nor so basely perverse. They go to church as to the play, to

gape at others, or to be stared at themselves; to pass the time, and to

admire the show; and they do not conceal that such is the object of their

attendance. Their indifference about futurity equals their ignorance of

religious duties. Our revolutionary charlatans have as much brutalized

their understanding as corrupted their hearts. They heard the Grand Mass

said by the Pope with the same feelings as they formerly heard

Robespierre proclaim himself a high priest of a Supreme Being; and they

looked at the Imperial processions with the same insensibility as they

once saw the daily caravans of victims passing for execution.

Even in Bonaparte’s own guard, and among the officers of his household

troops, several examples of rigour were necessary before they would go to

any place of worship, or suffer in their corps any almoners; but now,

after being drilled into a belief of Christianity, they march to the Mass

as to a parade or to a review. With any other people, Bonaparte would

not so easily have changed in two years the customs of twelve, and forced

military men to kneel before priests, whom they but the other day were

encouraged to hunt and massacre like wild beasts.

On the day of the Assumption of the Holy Virgin, a company of gendarmes

d’Elite, headed by their officers, received publicly, and by orders, the

sacrament; when the Abbe Frelaud approached Lieutenant Ledoux, he fell

into convulsions, and was carried into the sacristy. After being a

little recovered, he looked round him, as if afraid that some one would

injure him, and said to the Grand Vicar Clauset, who inquired the cause

of his accident and terror: “Good God! that man who gave me, on the 2d of

September, 1792, in the convent of the Carenes, the five wounds from

which I still suffer, is now an officer, and was about to receive the

sacrament from my hands.” When this occurrence was reported to

Bonaparte, Ledoux was dismissed; but Abbe Frelaud was transported, and

the Grand Vicar Clauset sent to the Temple, for the scandal their

indiscretion had caused. This act was certainly as unjust towards him

who was bayoneted at the altar, as towards those who served the altar

under the protection of the bayonets.

Memoirs of the Court of St. Cloud (Being secret letters from a gentleman at Paris to a nobleman in London) — Complete · 第 45 / 107 题