The Anabaptists were still very active in Germany, but more so in

Switzerland. In the countries favorable to the Reformation, the people

were more violent, excited and difficult to rule and satisfy. Freedom

of inquiry, of thought, had been applied to political as well as

theological matters. If it was boldly proclaimed from the pulpit: 'The

kingdom of the Pope is not of God, because he lays upon us unnatural

restraint, loads our consciences and makes us carry unnecessary

burdens,' the transition was easy to the question: 'Shall the rule of

the prince draw the skin over our ears at his own caprice?' Only

two remedies for this evil were available in monarchical countries;

either wisdom and moderation on the part of the princes themselves--a

paternal government, according to the demands and in the spirit of the

Gospel--or, where the rulers, as was yet frequently the case, were not

qualified or able to achieve this, a revival of the doctrine of passive

obedience--subjection in worldly things, as Luther maintained it. It is

clear, that to uphold this doctrine in a republic was a more difficult

task, and we have already shown, that Zwingli could not be numbered

among its advocates. On the political arena the difference between his

reformation and that of Luther began to grow more and more visible, and

so hateful did the former become, that the _Landgrave_ of Hesse even

was obliged to come back again toward Luther, and exhort Zwingli to

greater prudence and caution, especially after a saying of Erasmus had

found its way to the ears of the nobles, that the design was to bring

in democracy under the cloak of the Gospel.

Meanwhile the Emperor Charles had arrived in Germany and opened the

Imperial Diet at Augsburg in person, in the summer of 1530. Here they,

who were supposed to favor Zwingli's views, were in very ill repute.

"On all sides," Jacob Sturm wrote to him, "we are suspected, as though

we were hatching with foreign nations some marvellously dangerous plot

for the overthrow of the Emperor and the Empire; yea, we are regarded

as open rebels. Thou knowest how thoroughly false this is; yet there

are some who, therefore, wish also to hear nothing about our articles

of faith, because, they say, the report goes;[7] that some of us have

boasted, that we have provisions, arms and soldiers enough, not only to

repel force with force, but also to invade the territory of our

neighbors. There are those who affirm that we have already portioned

out among ourselves the ecclesiastical principalities, before the

victory, and I know not what other follies. In short, the Papists, and

even those who otherwise have declared themselves for the Gospel, act

against us here, openly and secretly, so that our destruction would be

decided on, if it only depended on them. If the Lord himself does not

pity us, does not stand by innocence and truth, then will our mighty

and raging foes yet devour us alive. No one defends us more than the

_Landgrave_, and even he does not venture to do it publicly, but only

to advocate our cause in narrower circles. To us, ears and access are

completely closed; we are crippled in all our members. From an appeal

in person, or from thy servants here, whom thou couldst entrust with

the Gospel, there is nothing to hope; should circumstances meanwhile

take a more favorable turn, I will send you word." And yet the

_Landgrave_ of Hesse, in a special conference with the Emperor, had

fearlessly defended himself and his friends, without however giving

among them the name of Zwingli, a confession of faith from whose hand

had just then reached Augsburg, and was viewed with the greatest

displeasure. The ingenious Switzer had woven into it some passages of a

political nature, which, though cautiously done, in his opinion, could

not but produce an unfavorable impression in the Imperial Court, as it

then stood. It contains among other things: "I well know that the

ruler, chosen or appointed in a lawful manner, occupies the place of

God, no less than the priest; but as the priest should be a minister of

heavenly wisdom and goodness, to defend the faith and bring errors to

light, so also should the ruler be a minister of divine goodness and

justice; goodness, in that he listens to and cares for his subjects

with fidelity and self-sacrifice, like God; justice, in that he holds

in check the impious and wicked and protects the innocent. If he does

this, then he preserves a quiet conscience, and has indeed nothing to

fear; if he does it not, and thus surrounds himself with fear and

terror, I cannot think that his conscience will be idle, only because

he has been chosen, or placed there, constitutionally. Yet, for my

part, I believe that a Christian should obey such a tyrant until the

opportunity is offered, of which Paul speaks: 'Canst thou make thyself

free? then delay not.' But this opportunity will be pointed out to him

by God alone, not by man, and that not doubtfully, but as clearly and

plainly, as when Saul was rejected and David chosen his successor." It

is easy to see, that, amid the universal excitement then prevailing,

language like this, so unusual in documents laid before the Imperial

Diet, as well as him who employed it, would be styled dangerous. More

than ever did Charles and his brother Ferdinand, King of Hungary,

withdraw their favor from the Reformed party and incline toward the

Catholics. But just in proportion as Zwingli was convinced, that the

number and hatred of his enemies in the German Empire were increasing,

his own earlier dislike to France and fear of an alliance with her,

appear to have essentially diminished. Already, in the secret political

conferences held at Marburg, he directed his attention to that country,

and it may indeed have been through a French channel, that a portion of

the news concerning the transactions of the Emperor in Spain and Italy,

especially with the Roman See, reached there. Still the French monarch,

Francis I., was not at all friendly to the Reformation. In his own

kingdom he tried to keep it down by force. His queen, a sister of

Charles V., did much to strengthen this feeling. Just at that time

letters from her brother at Augsburg, full of bitter complaints against

the spirit of the Protestants, so hostile to all civil and

ecclesiastical rule, were received in France. But what the King was not

willing to suffer in his own dominions, he beheld not without secret

pleasure in those of his envied and hated rival, for so he always

considered the Emperor, in spite of all ties of relationship. Out of

policy, therefore, in order to weaken the power of Austria, he

supported the German Protestants; and out of policy his envoys in

Switzerland, Dangerant, _seigneur de Boisrigault_ and Maigret,

_seigneur de Villequoy_, sought access even to Zwingli. With Maigret it

appears to have been equally a matter of spiritual interest; for he was

inclined to the Gospel and in after life became a decided Huguenot.

We have seen how Zurich, as well as the other cantons, was formerly

kept back from entering into a closer alliance with France chiefly

through Zwingli's efforts. It is remarkable to observe now a total

change in his views. Let us not condemn him unjustly, but hear him once

more tell his own story. The true picture of the event will show that

apparent inconsistency only sprang from an abiding enthusiasm, in

behalf of the one great idea, to which he had consecrated his life.

"The ambassadors of the King of France," he writes to Jacob Sturm,

"have asked me for an opinion, as to how the power of the Emperor might

be broken, or circumscribed, which I have written out in Latin; I had

refused it twice, and only when they applied the third time, sent it to

them with the knowledge of the Privy Council. It is now (Feb. 28th,

1530) the seventh day since Collin was despatched with it to the French

embassy. I cannot tell whether my paper will be sent along with the

messenger to the King or not." This document was in the form of a

letter, addressed to the cities of the Christian _Buergerrecht_. "It is

a known fact," so it begins, "that in former centuries no kings and no

people offered a more steady resistance to the overgrown power and

tyranny of the Roman Emperor than the most Christian kings of France

and the people of Helvetia. Through them, not only their own liberties,

but those also of other princes, nations and cities have been

maintained. Hence this alliance of powers--the greater one of France

and the lesser of the Confederates (which latter are not able by

themselves to sustain so great a war) cannot be dissolved without

injury to the cause of universal freedom. This the kings of France have

always kept in view. And, although at present the Five Cantons continue

to stand aloof from the cities of the Christian _Buergerrecht_, and

this in fact does not the less grieve the King of France, than if (God

forbid!) his two sons were at variance, still he preserves the feelings

and the policy of his ancestors, who valued the friendship and

attachment of no people more than that of the Confederates. Hence, if

he cannot effect a treaty with all Switzerland, on account of the

above-mentioned schism, he is yet at least willing to conclude one with

the cities of the Christian _Buergerrecht_, as well as those cantons,

which are not distant in their views, namely, with Glarus, Solothurn,

Appenzel and the Toggenburgers; and it shall be of such a character,

that even the Zurichers, who would not join the one concluded several

years ago, can no longer have any reason to stand aloof, because it

contains no articles contrary to the Divine law. For this purpose it

shall also be submitted beforehand to the theologians and preachers of

the Gospel in the Confederacy, since it is the dearest wish of the most

Christian King himself, that the Gospel shall be maintained in its

purity." The chief articles proposed by Zwingli are the following:

Twenty years for the duration of this alliance, whose special duty it

shall be to defend the Christian religion, and that against every man

who may assail it, without exception. If one of the two parties is

disturbed, because it has received the Gospel or for other reasons,

then the other shall send aid at the first call; should it, on the

contrary, make the attack, then authority is given, to help only, if

the reasons of the attack be found lawful. The troops of the cities in

the service of the king shall be paid by him. If they desire help, then

the king shall send whatever of cavalry and guns the treaty calls for,

at his own cost. The articles of the Perpetual Peace, already existing

with France, are to continue likewise in full force.

In a private letter sent to his near acquaintance, Maigret, along with

this scheme, Zwingli also proposed, if the King would consent, to open

the alliance to the _Landgrave_ of Hesse, who, though "a young man, was

yet prudent far beyond his years, magnanimous and resolute," and said

there would be no reason either to regret the admission of the Duke of

Wuertemburg, "who, though driven from his country, was living in exile,

but with a stout heart, and possessed of uncommon abilities, in union

with ripe experience; and I may do much also among other cities near

the borders of Switzerland. This I now say to thee, only in

confidence."

It is evident that the Reformer had made himself familiar with the idea

that his scheme would not be presented to the King in such a form.

Indeed, how could the ambassadors have dared even to send it? The very

form of the scheme--Zwingli venturing to speak in the name of the King,

and demand, moreover that the public act, to be issued by him and the

council of his own canton, should be first subjected to the censorship

of certain preachers--would very probably have appeared to Francis

extremely arrogant. For the Gospel he cared nothing. His heart was set

upon Lombardy, for the possession of which he had already waged two

wars with Charles. But to carry out his plans there, he needed the aid

of the Swiss, and hence the allusion to a division amongst them in the

scheme would have ensured it an unfavorable reception. Some days

afterward, Zwingli received written notice from both the ambassadors,

that the time had not yet come to entertain propositions of this

nature. Dangerant used such ambiguous language as to leave it doubtful

whether he anticipated similar communications in the future, or wished

to ridicule the whole affair. Maigret, who was well-disposed, remained

in constant intercourse with the Reformer, and, at a later period,

seems to have made a generous use of a sojourn of several months in

France, to kindle there a more friendly feeling on his behalf, of which

indeed there was great need.[8] He it was, who, after his return to

Switzerland, exhorted Zwingli to develope the substance of his

religious doctrines in a personal letter to the French King, in the

hope, that by this means much of the prejudice of that monarch against

them might be removed. The Reformer consented. In June of the last year

of his life, the writing was finished and sent to Paris, where it is

still extant in the Royal Library, a striking monument of firm faith,

as well as noble candor. As before, against the Emperor, he also speaks

against the French King in regard to political matters. Here we can

only quote the beautiful passage, which, though little apprehended in

that age, and even violently censured by Luther, shows in the most

vivid manner, how for he stood above his century, and how thoroughly he

was penetrated by the conviction that Christianity is designed to be

the universal religion--the kingdom of God, which must embrace all, who

have an honest will. "I believe," says he, "that the souls of the

faithful in Christ, as soon as they have torn themselves loose from the

earthly hull, rise to heaven, enter into closer union with the Godhead

and enjoy an eternal happiness. Here, most Christian King, thou durst

hope, if only like a David, a Hezekiah, a Josiah, thou hast made a wise

use of the power, which God has entrusted to thee, to see Him in his

essence, his form, in his almightiness and goodness, to become the

partaker of the fruits of his blessing, not scantily, but to full

satisfaction; yet not to that satiety which produces disgust, but that

which, in blissful fulness, like the streams that roll everlastingly

down to the sea and out of the pores of the earth renew themselves

again, water the landscape, cover it with smiles and adorn it with a

rich growth of flowers. The happiness, which we enjoy, will be without

end, can never be exhausted, for no weariness comes there; it is ever

new and ever the same. Then durst thou also hope to be taken yonder

into the communion, the society, the confidence of all, who, from the

beginning of the world, have led holy, wise, believing, steadfast,

brave and righteous lives. There wilt thou find the two Adams, the

saved and the Savior, Abel, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Judah,

Moses, Joshua, Gideon, Samuel, Phineas, Elijah, Elisha, Isaiah, and the

God-bearing Virgin of whom he prophesied, David, Hezekiah, Josiah, John

the Baptist, Peter and Paul; there also Hercules, Theseus, Socrates,

Aristides, Antigonus, Numa, Camillus, the Catos and the Scipios; there

Louis the Pious, and thy forefathers, the Louises, Philips, Pepins, as

many of whom as walked by faith. In fine, never has there been a noble

man, never has there existed a pure spirit, a true heart from the

beginning of the world till its end, whom thou wilt not find there,

enjoying communion with the Father."

Let us now turn back to the Five Cantons. The _Landfriede_ had operated

to their prejudice, as compared with their Reformed Confederates. Still

they strove in general to enforce its provisions, but according to that

interpretation, which, at the conclusion of the treaty, they had put

upon certain ambiguous articles. Special conferences among themselves,

and with other co-religionists were not at all abandoned; but neither

was this the case on the side of the Reformed. Yet when they met for

the transaction of private business, the voice of moderation,

especially in the beginning, was not seldom heard. Thus, at a meeting

in Altorf, toward the end of August, 1529, Uri declared with warmth,

"that, if any one of the Five Cantons were attacked contrary to the

Peace, she would pledge life and property for its defence, but that in

several cantons unbecoming language was used, and sundry markings done

with badges (fir-twigs upon their hats), which was improper and a

violation of the _Landfriede_; this they wished to maintain, and hence

did not approve of such things, and it is their friendly request,

that every canton will see it put away from among its people, though

they have done it; for if war should come on account of such reasons

above-named, she would promise nothing, and would feel bound to render

no aid; the Emperor in the meantime should not be written to." A month

later, at a another conference in Brunnen, Zug, in whose midst vehement

passions were still alive, was warned in a similar strain, and "the

deputy told of the unbecoming words which they used, that they should

be put away, lest confusion might arise therefrom;" and again at

Brunnen, in the beginning of the year following, it was resolved, that

"words of reviling and abuse be put away, since they can lead to

nothing good." They, who were guilty of these offences, were, for the

most part, proud, insolent partisan leaders, dreaded on account of

their lawless character and warlike propensities, or else, head-strong

young men, sons of politicians and distinguished councillors, and hence

it was the more difficult to apply a remedy. The Zurichers declared

themselves little satisfied with fines, or the imprisonment of some

poor fellow or obscure hot-head, dragged out of an ale-house, when, on

the other hand, in a large company, in presence of distinguished

members of the Reformed party, a man like Captain Sh[oe]nbrunner of Zug

was allowed to read, with ill-concealed malice, a dirty libel in which

Zwingli was accused of unnatural excesses and a loathsome disease; but,

on complaining bitterly of this, they only received the answer: "Our

Lords have told Henry Sh[oe]nbrunner, that his conduct does not please

them." It was not the abusive language of an obscure individual, which

created such a stir, but that of an influential man, one who, a short

time before, had been sent to the Imperial Diet at Augsburg and there

honored with a personal interview by King Ferdinand, the Emperor's

brother.

The Life and Times of Ulric Zwingli · 第 28 / 33 段