"And why not"--Zwingli asked in derision--"at Erfurt, or Wittemberg?[3]

Good brethren, the Lord Vicar makes use of much art, to divert you from

your purpose by his rhetorical flourishes. We inquire not how long a

thing may have been in use? We would speak of the truth as it presents

itself in the Divine Law. To this, mere usage ought to give way. We are

told of a Christian assembly, though I hope there is one such here in

this chamber. Where two or three are gathered together in my name, said

our Lord, I am in their midst. There are also _bishops_ enough here

among us; for the overseers and teachers of congregations have been so

styled by the Apostles, not powerful princes, ruling far and wide, as

we have them now-a-days. And wherefore should we need judges, when we

have the Holy Scripture itself here in the Hebrew, Greek and Latin

languages, and scholars, who understand these languages as well as any

at those universities? But even were this not the case, there are at

least so many Christian spirits amongst us, that with the help of God

it should become plain to us, which party interprets the Scripture

truly, and which falsely. And lastly, touching the Nuremberg business,

I may tell you, dear Lords, that I can produce, if necessary, three

letters, received from there very lately, but they contain not one word

about a decree actually published. Pope, bishops, prelates would

indeed, for the most part, be adverse to any meeting of the kind. And

you of Zurich ought to esteem it a great favor and a call of God, that

such a thing has happened among you."

A long pause ensued, till the burgomaster rose up, and once more

exhorted the opponents to come forth. No body stirred. "For the sake of

Christian charity"--said Zwingli--"I beg every one, who thinks my

doctrine erroneous, to speak out his thoughts. I know there are several

here, who have accused me of heresy; I may be compelled to call them

out by name." No one ventured to confront the powerful champion, whose

thorough knowledge they feared, whose attack on the episcopal

ambassador they had just witnessed, and whose unsparing mode of combat

they knew.

"Where now"--cried a voice from the door--"are the boasters behind the

wine-bottle and on the streets? Here is the man for you." It was

Gutschenkel of Bern, one of those knaves, who, because fools by

profession, escape the censure which their unbecoming speeches deserve.

Already it seemed, that with the laughter of Zwingli's friends, and the

inglorious flight of his opponents, the whole thing would come to an

end, when Jacob Wagner, pastor of Neftenbach, by a question cunningly

thrown out, in regard to the offence of the pastor of Fislispach

imprisoned at Constance, induced the Vicar-General to say something

about this man. With an assumed air of pity Faber spoke of his

ignorance, and how he himself, by explaining passages of Scripture, had

brought him to acknowledge his former errors. But these very same

errors Zwingli had also taught, and immediately he challenged Faber to

quote the victorious passages. "Good reason"--replied the Vicar

General--"had the wise man in the Old Testament, when he said: 'The

fool is easily taken in his speech.' I had firmly declared I would not

dispute." This beginning, certainly unexpected by the majority of the

audience, was followed by a prolix homily on the origin of heresies;

the battles of the Pope and Christendom against them; words of Roman

historians on the value of unity; the rareness of the gift of

interpreting languages, of which he himself could not boast; in short,

every thing but that which was demanded. Yet even here Zwingli never

suffered him to wait for an answer, but just as often as the Vicar,

with unwearied volubility renewed his digressions, he brought him back

to the passages demanded. Doctor Sebastian Hofmeister also began to

press Faber, and Leo Judæ likewise. The latter, for a short time back

people's priest at St. Peter's, was again united with his friend

Zwingli in Zurich. Sorely perplexed, the Vicar cried out: "A Hercules

could not stand against two;" but the simple method of defeating them

all, by a quotation of the passages, was still far from his thoughts.

Then rose up his companion. Doctor Martin Blausch, to secure for him a

retreat, if possible; but he also only dwelt on generalities, the

doctrines of the church, fathers, and the right of decision by

the church. "The good Lord fails to speak; the good Lord has not

rightly looked at the words," and similar gibes fell from Zwingli's

lips--proofs rather of confidence in the truth of his cause and

contempt of his opponents, than of the clemency, which lends to victory

a higher worth. After the silencing of the embassy of Constance, the

burgomaster called once more for other combatants, but in vain. Zwingli

had the last word. The crowd dispersed at noon.

The interval was used by the Council for drawing up its decision, which

was published to the meeting, again called together in the afternoon,

and ran thus: "All ye, who, answering our summons for the purposes

assigned, have appeared before us today, we give to understand. A year

is now gone, since an embassy of our gracious Lord of Constance was

here at our council-house, before the burgomaster and the Small and

Great Councils, on business of a similar kind. Then the request was

preferred by us to our gracious Lord, to call together in his diocese

learned men and preachers for the examination of the prevailing

doctrines; so that a unanimous resolution might be passed, by which

every one might be guided. But since, up to this time, perhaps for

obvious reasons, nothing special has been done by him in the matter,

and the dissension among the clergy and laity continually increases,

the burgomaster. Council and the Great Council of the city of Zurich,

have again taken the case in hand; and since now; after the offer of

Master Ulric Zwingli to render an account, no one has risen up, no one

has dared to refute by the Sacred Scriptures the articles he his

furnished, although he has repeatedly called on those who revile him as

a heretic--we, after mature counsel, have decided, and it is our

earnest opinion, that Master Ulric Zwingli shall go on and continue, as

heretofore, to proclaim the Holy Gospel and the real Sacred Scripture,

according to the Spirit of God and his ability. Also, all the other

priests of the people, pastors and preachers, in our city, canton and

dependencies, shall not do otherwise, nor preach, except what they may

be able to prove by the Holy Scripture. Likewise, they shall not

henceforth call each other hard names, nor use other words of reproach.

For they who act personally in this, we will deal with in such a

manner, that they shall see and find that they have done wrong."

"God be praised!"--said Zwingli--"He will have his Word rule in heaven

and on earth, and to you, my Lords of Zurich, he will doubtless grant

strength and power to establish his truth in your canton."

Once more the Vicar General essayed to speak. Now, for the first time,

it became possible for him to read the articles of Zwingli, and of

course he had to find several that were not sustained by the Holy

Scriptures. "Well then--prove it, Sir Vicar General," said Zwingli. It

can be seen in works on church-history, how Faber, with no little

adroitness and a blinding flow of words, endeavored to point out a

contradiction between several of the syllogisms and some points of Holy

Scripture. Perhaps, too, this would have succeeded before hearers less

instructed; but with the greatest ease his superior antagonist shewed

to the assembly, where in one place he tore words from their

connection, in another distorted the plain sense, sought to give the

later expressions of the Fathers a scriptural sound, and even employed

the arts of a lawyer, in which he himself was evidently conscious of

deceit. "You knew"--said Zwingli--"Sir Vicar General, that we,

formerly, at the university, practised in common such dazzling tricks

of logic, and that I am skilled in them as well as you; but it truly

grieves me, that you as a serious man come still armed with such

sophistries."

Anger began to appear in the assembly. The speeches of the opposing

parties became shorter and more bitter. In order to keep them from

degenerating into abuse, the Councils rose. The assembly dissolved, and

the burgomaster Roist took leave of the by-standers with a smile,

saying: "The sword, with which the pastor of Fislispach was stabbed,

would not come out of its sheath to-day."

Faber by his behavior had fallen low in the estimation of the

Zurichers. The monks alone, whose courage again revived, since the

close of the battle, tried among those with whom they associated, to

point out the circumstance, that the Vicar General had kept the last

word, as a sign of victory. He himself also boasted of it in Constance

after his return, and wherever Zwingli's rough manner or vehement

language afforded an opportunity for censure, it was heaped up and

spread on all sides. "In short"--writes Salat of Luzern, clerk of the

court--"Zwingli pours down far too many scornful words on the head of

the Lord Vicar, that excellent man of honor. Now he calls him Sir Hans,

Sir John, Sir Vicary, plucks the vicar-bonnet off, and this times

without number, and without shame. This was his mode of disputing."

Calmly and with a manifest endeavor, as far as it lay in his power, to

form an unbiassed judgment, an old schoolmaster, Erhard Hegenwald, has

described the transaction; and his narrative is the more worthy of

credence, for the very reason that Faber was so provoked by it, that he

attempted to refute it by a statement of his own. The distinguished

air, which he assumed, the haughty treatment of Hegenwald, the

importance, which he strove to give to his trifling mistakes, the

mixture also of unfounded assertions contained in this production

roused the indignation of the young men of Zurich, six of whom, members

then already for the most part of the Great, and afterwards of the

Small Council, joined in the publication of an answer to Faber, which

they entitled "Hawk Plucking." The rude castigation, the biting and

often also tasteless wit, and the entire absence of all the respect,

which they formerly paid to age and official position, sorely wounded

the Vicar General, who, but that it seemed useless, would have

complained of the "libelous little book" to the government of Zurich.

Thus the hostility of Faber toward Zwingli and his friends soon

extended itself to Zurich also. This champion against the doctrines of

the Reformer became a persecutor of all his adherents--an inexorable

judge to those, who fell into his power. In the end he even laughed at

the tears, which the torture of the rack wrung from one of his victims,

and rejoiced to see him burning at the stake.[4]

Zwingli, although satisfied with the decree of the government, that he

should continue unmolested in his way of teaching, was by no means so

with the turn, which the conference took in the afternoon, through

the tricks of Faber and the sort of protest against his syllogisms as

anti-scriptural, with which the Vicar General had left Zurich. He

resolved to append to each one of these points a detailed explanation

and proof, in a work, which is even now considered the basis of his

system of Christian doctrine, as well as his views in regard to

church and state.[5] "Day and night"--he wrote to his friend Werner

Steiner--"do I labor at this work." It consisted of a volume of 300

closely-printed pages, and was finished in five months, amid daily

preaching and a crowd of other business. New and still more violent

enemies were awakened by its appearance, and, although many boasting

promises of a refutation were made, none ever saw the light.

But with the rapid spread of this work the time had come, when the

influence of the Reformer, hitherto confined mostly to Zurich and its

territory, flowed out in all directions beyond these limits. The Zurich

ambassadors had to witness a prelude of this in a riot at Luzern, where

a disorderly rabble, instigated by several deputies of the diet sitting

at that place, carried past their lodging an effigy of Zwingli with

scoffs and curses, and burnt it with all the formalities used by the

Inquisition. Two months later, in June, Caspar G[oe]ldi, who had been

obliged to leave Zurich on account of mercenary service, complained

before a second diet at Baden, that his daughter had willfully eloped

from the convent of Hermatschweil and married one Schuster at

Bremgarten, and the _landvogt_ of Sorgans likewise, that a priest of

that place had taken to himself a wife. Zwingli's sermons became still

more severe against deserters and pensions. "Confederates,"--said

Caspar of Muelinen--"check Lutheranism in the bud. The preachers at

Zurich have already become masters of their rulers, so that they are no

more able to withstand them. A man is no longer safe there in his own

house. The peasantry refuse to pay their rents and tithes, and great

discord reigns in the city and canton." The resolution was carried in

the Recess, to communicate the complaints to all the governments, in

order to agree if possible on a remedy; especially since the pastor had

meddled also in political affairs, and preached among other things:

"Confederates sell Christian blood and eat Christian flesh."

At Zwingli's request, the articles of the Recess were given to him, so

that he might draw up a vindication. This vindication, which was also

laid before the Great Council at Zurich, shows the undaunted courage of

the man, as well as his assurance of being in the path of duty.

"Wise and gracious Lords,"--wrote he--"I believe indeed that complaints

against me are rife; but to show the justice of them is, as I hope in

God, in the power of no one. I will indeed confess, that I earnestly

rebuke the prevailing vices, in chief that of perfidious bribe-taking,

which is in vogue in nearly all courts and countries. But of my Lords,

the Confederates, I have never spoken improperly. I have named them

perhaps, though not rudely; for, from youth up, nothing has been more

foreign to my nature, except when my fatherland has been evil spoken

of. When obliged to rebuke severely and bear down against vices, then I

have mentioned neither Dalmatians nor Englishmen; and this is my

constant custom. Moreover, by no means do I agree with them, who say,

no body ought ever to be called by name from the pulpit. God has never

commanded this; perhaps the Pope has; but none the less am I of

opinion, that we should not make the Word of God hateful by our

rashness. When, during Lent in the past year, I preached about

eating flesh, I uttered these, among other words: Many a one reviles

flesh-eating as evil and thinks that a great sin, which God has never

forbidden; but to butcher and sell human flesh, he thinks no sin. But

in this I called neither Confederates, nor _landsknechts_, by name.

That I said nothing more, the Great Council of Zurich will bear me

witness. In general, for some time back I have had to endure incredible

lies against me; they have caused me little sorrow, for I thought: The

disciple is not above his master; they lied against Christ, hence it is

no wonder, they lie against thee also. Thus my enemies once said of me,

that I abused the mother of God our Lord, Jesus Christ. I answered them

with a suitable little book. Again they say, I have declared that

neither rents nor tithes should be paid. Item, that I have no regard

for Christ's holy body, and have preached an opinion about it so

scandalous, that I will not repeat it, lest the hearts of pious

Christians might be shocked. And much other stuff of the like sort,

they swear I have preached; but all these, saving your Honors'

presence, are pure lies. Then they tell of me that I have had four

children this year; that I wander about the streets at night; that I am

a gambler; that I am hired by pensions from princes and lords; yet

these also, saving your Honors' presence, are pure lies. Now I would

not again set right these points, touching my morals, if they were not

prejudicial to the good city of Zurich; for, since it would be a great

disgrace to so glorious a city, if it suffered such vices even in a

boy, I need not speak of one, who is devoted to God's Word and the

common salvation of men. As to this, wise and gracious Lords, let it be

far from you to put faith in any one, who speaks what he pleases

against others or myself; for the times are perilous. The devil, who is

an enemy of the truth, has used all his arts to cast down and destroy

it. Therefore it is my humble prayer to Your Worships, that, as

heretofore, if they have somewhat to say to me, or any one somewhat

against me, he or they seek me before my Lords at Zurich, where I am a

citizen and a canon; besides a born Toggenburger and a countryman at

Schwyz and Glarus. Bat, as for as regards the doctrine of Christ, I ask

no other protection from any one, than may serve to prevent

interference against the pure word of God; and each and every one shall

see, if God will, that since I laid hold of the Gospel of Christ, I

have never taught anything, whose ground I did not search into

beforehand, as far as God permitted. Understand this my plain, hasty

letter in the best sense; for it is written without deceitful cunning.

Let it also be made public, so that each and every one can see my

innocence. And may Almighty God keep your State in his grace and honor!

Amen."

There is nothing in the records of the Recesses to show, whether this

vindication was really read before the Diet. It is certain, however,

that it was known to the individual members, among whom, as well as

among the States, opinions concerning Zwingli already began to be

divided, and his adherents were treated with far more mildness in Bern,

Solothurn, Basel and Schaffhausen, than in Luzern, Freiburg and the

three Forest Cantons. In Glarus several of the most influential members

of the government continued to keep up a correspondence with him, or a

friendly feeling toward him; indeed, the government of Bern, as early

as June, 1528, issued a decree, that that only, which could be proved

by the Holy Scripture, should be taught in the pulpit; and, at the

close of the same year, the nuns of K[oe]nigsfeld received permission

to leave the convent, if they desired it.

In this respect, the Council of Zurich had already taken the lead in

the month of June, by doing the same thing for the Sisters at

[OE]denbach. The wealth of this convent was considerable; the nuns,

whose number was rather large, belonged, for the most part, to

distinguished families. It was no easy undertaking, in a time of such

excitement, to keep peace among them, especially because the fiercest

enemies of reform, the Dominican monks, who were devoted to the same

rule of order, had abundant access to them as preachers, as confessors,

and under all possible pretences. The Council, sorry to find this

influence, and tracing it in the quarrels, which already began to arise

in many families, through the instigation of the spiritual sisters,

invited Zwingli to preach in the convent. This had never yet been done

by a so-called secular priest. A part of the nuns refused to hear the

unwelcome speaker. Zwingli therefore printed the discourse, which he

delivered, and sent it to them. Requests were now sent to the

government by one for release from her vows; prayers by another for the

return of their former confessors and preachers. Strife arose in the

convent. Here parents saw with displeasure the resolution of their

daughters to go back into secular life, whilst others were

dissatisfied, because theirs refused to do this. For some time the

Council tried to help matters by rendering access to the convent

difficult, and by obliging Leo Judæ to preach there regularly; but when

the discord was not allayed thereby, permission to leave was granted to

all those who desired to go, with the privilege of taking whatever they

had brought, besides their clothing and furniture. The rest were

allowed to remain in the convent, but were obliged to lay aside the

habit of the order and listen to Leo Judge's preaching. For the

management of the revenues and general control a court of magistrates

was instituted. The number of those, who went back to secular life,

still increased; the aged gradually died off in the convent. Similar

ordinances were passed in relation to the other nunneries in the

territory of Zurich.

It is enough to show, that in these arrangements, the government was

prompted neither by a blind zeal for tearing down, nor a base desire

for the property of the convents. He who looks over the writings of

Zwingli,[6] will soon find, that the Council followed closely the path

marked out by him, and indeed throughout, in the consciousness that

they acted in full harmony with the Holy Scriptures. As another proof

of the bold thinking and fearless language of the Reformer, we will

here quote, if it be only what he says, in the Explanation of his Final

Discourses as to the right disposition of the property of the

suppressed establishments: "The simple-minded shudder at this, because

they think it not right to change the last will of any body; but a

greater fraud lies in this than in other abuses. See: What motive

swayed those, who founded the benefices? Nothing else than because they

were falsely taught, that the mass is a sacrifice. Therefore they

dreamed they were bestowing their possessions on the poor, when they

gave to this object. But now, since we are conscious of the deceit,

that the mass is not a sacrifice, but the food of him, who eats with

faith and spiritual hunger, we may divert the property to the poor, and

withdraw it from idle bellies; yet we do this after their departure.

But here they cry out; See, thus they undertake to do away with

testaments, legacies and last wills! Answer: Here lies the rogue behind

the hedge. Has not every government its own right and custom in the

making of legacies? Who meddles with the appointment of heirs? Who

wishes to act falsely here? You have falsified more than any one else;

for you have tampered with last wills, so that that has been given to

you, which belonged to other lawful heirs, and you have done it by your

parables and false doctrines.[7] Thus what the people have as a civil

right, you claim as a divine right.... See, here we find the real

forgers of wills, who have foisted in their avarice, by pretending that

it was kindly done for the salvation of souls. But they say, if one of

his own free-will gives us his property on his death-bed, is it not

right for us to take it? Answer: no, for thou shouldst have before

given a right Christian understanding to the donor, representing things

thus: Consider not thy temporal property thine own; thou art only a

steward over it. Thou shouldst divide it among the poor, which is

pleasing to God, and shouldst not give it to those, who do not need it.

Thou seest that such property is often used, only to foster pride and

vanity in the temples, even though it is not squandered wantonly. God

has commanded, to give to the poor; do it then; and no one shall be

scandalized, if that which has hitherto been misused, is turned to the

Christian advantage of the poor. For were they who, unknowingly have

contributed to their bellies, still here, they would snatch it again

out of their hands. But no appropriating hand should be laid on it; for

that would be acting the thief, or the robber. The authorities should

wait till the jointures are without a possessor (till the present

incumbents are dead, or have voluntarily relinquished their rights),

and then arrange it with God himself; so that common justice be

maintained and no one led into wickedness."

Why should a people, accustomed to form free judgments on human

affairs, as well as to express their opinions freely concerning them,

oppose with violence such views, founded as they were by Zwingli, at

all points, on the Holy Scriptures? Did not experience also teach that

the Church of Christ has become great in poverty, and straightway been

corrupted by riches? Willingly or unwillingly, the government had to

yield to public opinion, and awaken to a still more lively

consciousness, that, if it would not continually oscillate, without

character, between the old and the new, no escape remained, except in

the way which the welfare and honor of the country pointed out; by

making common cause with the bold and progressive Reformer.

From this feeling, it no longer threw any obstacles in the way of the

public marriage of the clergy in the churches, even that of Leo Judæ,

people's priest at St. Peter's. William R[oe]ubli, then preacher at

Wytikon, anxious to set a striking example, had made a beginning, by

wedding the daughter of a wealthy countryman, amid a concourse of

joyful guests, on the 28th of April, 1523.

The Life and Times of Ulric Zwingli · 第 9 / 33 段