III. The final yielding.

It is to Pilate's credit that he kept up his efforts so long. Luke

wishes to impress us with his persistency, as well as with the fixed

determination of the Jews, by his note of 'the third time.' Thrice was

the choice offered to them, and thrice did they put away the possibility

of averting their doom. But Pilate's persistency had a weak place, for

he was afraid of his subjects, and, while willing to save Jesus, was

not willing to imperil himself in doing it. Self-interest takes the

strength out of resolution to do right, like a crumbling stone in a

sea wall, which lets in the wave that ruins the whole structure.

Pilate had come to the end of his shifts to escape pronouncing

sentence. The rulers had refused to judge Jesus according to their

law. Herod had sent Him back with thanks, but unsentenced. The Jews

would not have Him, but Barabbas, released, nor would they accept

scourging in lieu of crucifying. So he has to decide at last whether

to be just and fear not, or basely to give way, and draw down on his

head momentary applause at the price of everlasting horror. Luke

notices in all three stages the loud cries of the Jews, and in this

last one he gives special emphasis to them. 'Their voices

prevailed.' What a condemnation for a judge! He 'gave sentence that

what they asked for should be done.' Baseness in a judge could go no

farther. The repetition of the characterisation of Barabbas brings

up once more the hideousness of the people's choice, and the tragic

words 'to their will' sets in a ghastly light the flagrant injustice

of the judge, and yet greater crime of the Jews. To deliver Jesus to

their will was base; to entertain such a 'will' towards Jesus was

more than base,--it was 'the ruin of them, and of all Israel.' Our

whole lives here and hereafter turn on what is our 'will' to Him.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: St. Luke · 第 252 / 274 题