THE STRAIT GATE

'And He went through the cities and villages, teaching,

and journeying toward Jerusalem. 23. Then said one unto

Him, Lord, are there few that be saved? And He said

unto them, 24. Strive to enter in at the strait gate:

for many, I say unto you, will seek to enter in, and

shall not he able. 25. When once the Master of the

house is risen up, and hath shut to the door, and ye

begin to stand without, and to knock at the door,

saying, Lord, Lord, open unto us; and He shall answer

and say unto you, I know you not whence ye are:

26. Then shall ye begin to say, We have eaten and drunk

in Thy presence, and Thou hast taught in our streets.

27. But He shall say, I tell you, I know you not whence

ye are; depart from Me, all ye workers of iniquity.

28. There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when

ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all the

prophets, in the kingdom of God, and you yourselves

thrust out. 29. And they shall come from the east, and

from the west, and from the north, and from the south,

and shall sit down in the kingdom of God. 30. And,

behold, there are last which shall be first and there

are first which shall be last.'--LUKE xiii. 22-30

'Are there few that be saved?' The questioner's temper and motives

may be inferred from the tone of Christ's answer, which turns

attention from a mere piece of speculative curiosity to the grave

personal aspect of the condition of 'salvation,' and the possibility

of missing it. Whether few or many went in, there would be many left

out, and among these some of the listeners. Jesus speaks to 'them,'

the multitude, not to the questioner. The men who approach solemn

subjects lightly, and use them as material for raising profitless

questions for the sake of getting religious teachers in a corner,

exist still, and are best answered after Christ's manner.

Of course, the speaker meant by being 'saved' participation in

Messiah's kingdom, regarded in the carnal Jewish fashion; and our

Lord's reply is primarily directed to setting forth the condition of

entrance into that kingdom, as the Jew expected it to be manifested

on earth. But behind that immediate reference lies a solemn

unveiling of the conditions of salvation in its deepest meaning, and

of the danger of exclusion from it.

I. We note, first, the all-important exhortation with which Christ

seeks to sober a frivolous curiosity. In its primary application, the

'strait gate' may be taken to be the lowliness of the Messiah, and the

consequent sharp contrast of His kingdom with Jewish high-flown and

fleshly hopes. The passage to the promised royalty was not through a

great portal worthy of a palace, but by a narrow, low-browed wicket,

through which it took a man trouble to squeeze. For us, the narrow

gate is the self-abandonment and self-accusation which are

indispensable for entrance into salvation.

'The door of faith' is a narrow one; for it lets no self-righteousness,

no worldly glories, no dignities, through. Like the Emperor at Canossa,

we are kept outside till we strip ourselves of crowns and royal robes,

and stand clothed only in the hair-shirt of penitence. Like Milton's

rebel angels entering their council chamber, we must make ourselves

small to get in. We must creep on our knees, so low is the vault; we

must leave everything outside, so narrow is it. We must go in one by

one, as in the turnstiles at a place of entertainment. The door opens

into a palace, but it is too strait for any one who trusts to himself.

There must be effort in order to enter by it. For everything in our

old self-confident, self-centred nature is up in arms against the

conditions of entrance. We are not saved by effort, but we shall not

believe without effort. The main struggle of our whole lives should

be to cultivate self-humbling trust in Jesus Christ, and to 'fight

the good fight of faith.'

II. We note the reason for the exhortation. It is briefly given in

verse 24 (last clause), and both parts of the reason there are

expanded in the following verses. Effort is needed for entrance,

because many are shut out. The questioner would be no better for

knowing whether few would enter, but he and all need to burn in on

their minds that many will _not_.

Very solemnly significant is the difference between _striving_

and _seeking_. It is like the difference between wishing and

willing. There may be a seeking which has no real earnestness in it,

and is not sufficiently determined, to do what is needful in order

to find. Plenty of people would like to possess earthly good, but

cannot brace themselves to needful work and sacrifice. Plenty would

like to 'go to heaven,' as they understand the phrase, but cannot

screw themselves to the surrender of self and the world. Vagrant,

halfhearted seeking, such as one sees many examples of, will never

win anything, either in this world or in the other. We must strive,

and not only seek.

That is true, even if we do not look beyond time; but Jesus carries

our awed vision onwards to the end of the days, in the expansion of

his warning, which follows in verses 25-27. No doubt, the words had

a meaning for His hearers in reference to the Messianic kingdom, and

a fulfilment in the rejection of the nation. But we have to discern

in them a further and future significance.

Observe that the scene suggested differs from the similar parable of

the virgins waiting for their Lord, in that it does not describe a

wedding feast. Here it is a householder already in his house, and,

at the close of the day, locking up for the night. Some of his

servants have not returned in time, have not come in through the

narrow gate, which is now not only narrow, but closed by the

master's own hand. The translation of that is that, by a decisive

act of Christ's in the future, the time for entrance will he ended.

As in reference to each stage of life, specific opportunities are

given in it for securing specific results, and these can never be

recovered if the stage is past; so mortal life, as a whole, is the

time for entrance, and if it is not used for that purpose, entrance

is impossible. If the youth will not learn, the man will be

ignorant. If the sluggard will not plough because the weather is

cold, he will 'beg in harvest.' If we do not strive to enter at the

gate, it is vain to seek entrance when the Master's own hand has

barred it.

The language of our Lord here seems to shut us up to the conclusion

that life is the time in which we can gain our entrance. It is no

kindness to suggest that perhaps He does not shut the door quite

fast. We know, at all events, that it is wide open now.

The words put into the mouths of the excluded sufficiently define

their characters, and the reasons why they sought in vain. Why did

they want to be in? Because they wished to get out of the cold

darkness into the warm light of the bountiful house. But they

neither knew the conditions of entrance nor had they any desire

after the true blessings within. Their deficiencies are plainly

marked in their pleas for admission. At first, they simply ask for

entrance, as if thinking that to wish was to have. Then, when the

Householder says that He knows nothing about them, and cannot let

strangers in, they plead as their qualification that they had eaten

and drunk in His presence, and that He had taught in their streets.

In these words, the relations of Christ's contemporaries are

described, and their immediate application to them is plain.

Outward connection with Jesus gave no claim to share in His kingdom.

We have to learn the lesson which we who live amidst a widely

diffused, professing Christianity sadly need. No outward connection

with Christ, in Christian ordinances or profession, will avail to

establish a claim to have the door opened for us. A man may be a

most respectable and respected church-member, and have listened to

Christian teaching all his days, and have in life a vague wish to be

'saved,' and yet be hopelessly unfit to enter, and therefore

irremediably shut out.

The Householder's answer, in its severity and calmness, indicates

the inflexible impossibility of opening to such seekers. It puts

stress on two things--the absence of any vital relationship between

Him and them, and their moral character. He knows nothing about

them, and not to be known by the Master of the house is necessarily

to be shut out from His household. They are known of the Shepherd

who know Him and hear His voice. They who are not must stay in the

desert. Such mutual knowledge is the basis of all righteousness, and

righteousness is the essential condition of entrance.

These seekers are represented as still working iniquity. They had

not changed their moral nature. They wished to enter heaven, but

they still loved evil. How could they come in, even if the door had

been open? Let us learn that, while faith is the door, without

holiness no man shall see the Lord. The worker of iniquity has only

an outward relation to Jesus. Inwardly he is separated from Him,

and, at last, the outward relation will be adjusted to the inward,

and departure from Him will be inevitable, and that is ruin.

III. Boldly and searchingly personal as the preceding words had

been, the final turn of Christ's answer must have had a still

sharper and more distasteful edge. He had struck a blow at Jewish

trust in outward connection with Messiah as ensuring participation

in His kingdom. He now says that the Gentiles shall fill the vacant

places. Many Jews will be unable to enter, for all their seeking,

but still there will be many saved; for troops of hated Gentiles

shall come from every corner of the earth, and the sight of them

sitting beside the fathers of the nation, while Israel after the

flesh is shut out, will move the excluded to weeping--the token of

sorrow, which yet has in it no softening nor entrance-securing

effect, because it passes into 'gnashing of teeth,' the sign of

anger. Such sorrow worketh death.

Such fierce hatred, joined with stiff-necked obstinacy, has

characterised the Jew ever since Jerusalem fell. 'If God spared not

the natural branches, take heed lest He also spare not thee.' Israel

was first, and has become last. The same causes which sent it from

the van to the rear have worked like effects in 'Christendom,' as

witness Asia Minor and the mosques into which Christian churches

have been turned.

These causes will produce like effects wherever they become

dominant. Any church and any individual Christian who trusts in

outward connection with Christ, and works iniquity, will sooner or

later fall into the rear, and if repentance and faith do not lead it

or him through the strait gate, will be among those 'last' who are

so far behind that they are shut out altogether. Let us 'be not

high-minded, but fear.'

Expositions of Holy Scripture: St. Luke · 第 188 / 274 题