JOHN'S WITNESS TO JESUS, AND GOD'S

'And as the people were in expectation, and all men

mused in their hearts of John, whether he were the

Christ, or not; 16. John answered, saying unto them

all, I indeed baptize you with water; but one mightier

than I cometh, the latchet of whose shoes I am not

worthy to unloose: He shall baptize you with the Holy

Ghost, and with fire: 17. Whose fan is in His hand,

and He will thoroughly purge His floor, and will gather

the wheat into His garner; but the chaff He will burn

with fire unquenchable. 18. And many other things, in

his exhortation, preached he unto the people. 19. But

Herod the tetrarch, being reproved by him for Herodias

his brother Philip's wife, and for all the evils which

Herod had done, 20. Added yet this above all, that he

shut up John in prison. 21. Now, when all the people

were baptized, it came to pass, that Jesus also being

baptized, and praying, the heaven was opened, 22. And

the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape, like a

dove, upon Him; and a voice came from heaven, which

said, Thou art My beloved Son; in Thee I am well

pleased.'--LUKE iii. 15-22.

This passage falls into three parts: John's witness to the coming

Messiah (vs. 15-17); John's undaunted rebuke of sin in high places,

and its penalty (vs. 18-20); and God's witness to Jesus (vs. 21,

22).

I. Luke sharply parts off the Baptist's work as a preacher of

repentance and plain morality from his work as the herald who

preceded the king. The former is delineated in verses 7-14, and its

effect was to set light to the always smouldering expectation of the

Messiah. The people were ready to rally round him if he would say

that he was the coming deliverer. It was a real temptation, but his

unmoved humility, which lay side by side with his boldness, brushed

it aside, and poured an effectual stream of cold water on the

excitement. 'John answered' the popular questionings, of which he

was fully aware, and his answer crushed them.

In less acute fashion, the same temptation comes to all who move the

general conscience. Disciples always seek to hoist their teacher

higher than is fitting. Adherence to him takes the place of

obedience to his message, and, if he is a true man, he has to damp

down misdirected enthusiasm.

Mark John's clear apprehension of the limitations of his work. He

baptized with water, the symbol and means of outward cleansing. He

does not depreciate his position or the importance of his baptism,

but his whole soul bows in reverence before the coming Messiah,

whose great office was to transcend his, as the wide Mediterranean

surpassed the little lake of Galilee. His outline of that work is

grand, though incomplete. It is largely based upon Malachi's closing

prophecy, and the connection witnesses to John's consciousness that

he was the Elijah foretold there. He saw that the Messiah would

surpass him in his special endowment. Strong as he was, that other

was to be stronger. Probably he did not dream that that other was to

wield the divine might, nor that His perfect strength was to be

manifested in weakness, and to work its wonders by the might of

gentle, self-sacrificing love. But, though he dimly saw, he

perfectly adored. He felt himself unworthy (literally, insufficient)

to be the slave who untied (or, according to Matthew, 'bore') his

lord's sandals. How beautiful is the lowliness of that strong

nature! He stood erect in the face of priests and tetrarchs, and

furious women, and the headsman with his sword, but he lay prostrate

before his King.

Strength and royal authority were not all that he had to proclaim of

Messiah. 'He shall baptize you in the Holy Ghost and fire.' We

observe that the construction here is different from that in verse

16 ('with water'), inasmuch as the preposition 'in' is inserted,

which, though it is often used 'instrumentaly,' is here, therefore,

more probably to be taken as meaning simply 'in.' The two nouns are

coupled under one preposition, which suggests that they are fused

together in the speaker's mind as reality and symbol.

Fire is a frequently recurrent emblem of the Holy Spirit, both in

the Old and New Testament. It is not the destructive, but the

vitalising, glowing, transforming, energy of fire, which is

expressed. The fervour of holy enthusiasm, the warmth of ardent

love, the melting of hard hearts, the change of cold, damp material

into its own ruddy likeness, are all set forth in this great symbol.

John's water baptism was poor beside Messiah's immersion into that

cleansing fire. Fire turns what it touches into kindred flame. The

refiner's fire melts metal, and the scum carries away impurities.

Water washes the surface, fire pierces to the centre.

But while that cleansing by the Spirit's fire was to be Messiah's

primary office, man's freedom to accept or reject such blessing

necessarily made His work selective, even while its destination was

universal. So John saw that His coming would part men into two

classes, according as they submitted to His baptism of fire or not.

The homely image of the threshing-floor, on some exposed, windy

height, carries a solemn truth. The Lord of the harvest has an

instrument in His hand, which sets up a current of air, and the

wheat falls in one heap, while the husks are blown farther, and lie

at the edge of the floor. Mark the majestic emphasis on the Christ's

ownership in the two phrases, '_His_ floor' and '_His_ garner.'

Notice, too, the fact which determines whether a man is chaff or

wheat--namely, his yielding to or rejecting the fiery baptism which

Christ offers. Ponder that awful emblem of an empty, rootless,

fruitless, worthless life, which John caught up from Psalm I.

Thankfully think of the care and safe keeping and calm repose

shadowed in that picture of the wheat stored in the garner after the

separating act. And let us lay on awed hearts the terrible doom of

the chaff. There are two fires, to one or other of which we must be

delivered. Either we shall gladly accept the purging fire of the

Spirit which burns sin out of us, or we shall have to meet the

punitive fire which burns up us and our sins together. To be

cleansed by the one or to be consumed by the other is the choice

before each of us.

II. Verses 18-20 show John as the preacher and martyr of

righteousness. Luke tells his fate out of its proper place, in order

to finish with him, and, as it were, clear the stage for Jesus.

Similarly the Baptist's desert life is told by anticipation in

chapter i. 80. That treatment of his story marks his subordination.

His martyrdom is not narrated by Luke, though he knew of it (Luke

ix. 7-9), and this brief summary is all that is said of his heroic

vehemence of rebuke to sin in high places, and of his suffering for

righteousness' sake. John's message had two sides to it, as every

gospel of God's has. To the people he spoke good tidings and

exhortations; to lordly sinners he pealed out stern rebukes.

It needs some courage to tell a prince to his face that he is foul

with corruption, and, still more, to put a finger on his actual

sins. But he is no prophet who does not lift up his voice like a

trumpet, and speak to hardened consciences. King Demos is quite as

impatient of close dealing with his immorality as Herod was. London

and New York get as angry with the Christian men who fight against

their lust and drunkenness as ever he did, and would not be sorry if

they could silence these persistent 'fanatics' as conveniently as he

could. The need for courage like John's, and plain speech like his,

is not past yet. The 'good tidings' has rebuke as part of its

substance. The sword is two-edged.

III. The narrative now turns to Jesus, and does not even name John

as having baptized Him. The peculiarities of Luke's account of the

baptism are instructive. He omits the conversation between Jesus and

John, and the fact of John's seeing the dove and hearing the voice.

Like Mark, he makes the divine voice speak directly to Jesus,

whereas Matthew represents it as spoken _concerning_ Him. The

baptism itself is disposed of in an incidental clause (_having

been baptized_). The general result of these characteristics is

that this account lays emphasis on the bearing of the divine witness

as borne to Jesus Himself. It does not deny, but simply ignores, its

aspect as a witness borne to John.

Another striking point is Luke's mention of Christ's prayer, which

is thus represented as answered by the opened heavens, the

descending dove, and the attesting voice. We owe most of our

knowledge of Christ's prayers to this Evangelist, whose mission was

to tell of the Son of man. Mysteries beyond our plummets are

contained in this story; but however unique it is, it has this which

may be reproduced, that prayer unveiled heaven, and brought down the

dove to abide on the bowed head, and the divine attestation of

sonship to fill the waiting heart.

We need not dwell on the beautiful significance of the emblem of the

dove. It symbolised both the nature of that gracious, gentle Spirit,

and the perpetuity and completeness of its abode on Jesus. Others

receive portions of that celestial fullness, but itself, as if

embodied in visible form, settled down on Him, and, with meekly

folded wings, tarried there unscared. 'God giveth not the Spirit by

measure unto Him.'

Our Evangelist does not venture into the deep waters, nor attempt to

tell what was the relation between the Incarnate Word, as it dwelt

in Jesus before that descent, and the Spirit which came upon Him. We

shall be wise if we refrain from speculating on such points, and

content ourselves with knowing that there has been one manhood

capable of receiving and retaining uninterruptedly the whole Spirit

of God; and that He will fill us with the Spirit which dwelt in Him,

in measure and manner corresponding to our need and our faith.

The heavenly voice spoke to the heart of the man Jesus. What was His

need of it, and what were its effects on Him, we do not presume to

affirm. But probably it originated an increased certitude of the

consciousness which dawned, in His answer to Mary, of His unique

divine sonship. To us it declares that He stands in an altogether

unexampled relation of kindred to the Father, and that His whole

nature and acts are the objects of God's complacency. But He has

nothing for Himself alone, and in Him we may become God's beloved

sons, well pleasing to the Father.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: St. Luke · 第 72 / 274 题