In the first place, then, the French coffee is coffee, and not chiccory,

or rye, or beans, or peas. In the second place, it is freshly roasted,

whenever made,—roasted with great care and evenness in a little

revolving cylinder which makes part of the furniture of every kitchen,

and which keeps in the aroma of the berry. It is never overdone, so as

to destroy the coffee-flavor, which is in nine cases out of ten the

fault of the coffee we meet with. Then it is ground, and placed in a

coffee-pot with a filter, through which it percolates in clear drops,

the coffee-pot standing on a heated stove to maintain the temperature.

The nose of the coffee-pot is stopped up to prevent the escape of the

aroma during this process. The extract thus obtained is a perfectly

clear, dark fluid, known as _café noir_, or black coffee. It is black

only because of its strength, being in fact almost the very essential

oil of coffee. A table-spoonful of this in boiled milk would make what

is ordinarily called a strong cup of coffee. The boiled milk is prepared

with no less care. It must be fresh and new, not merely warmed or even

brought to the boiling-point, but slowly simmered till it attains a

thick, creamy richness. The coffee mixed with this, and sweetened with

that sparkling beet-root sugar which ornaments a French table, is the

celebrated _café-au-lait_, the name of which has gone round the world.

As we look to France for the best coffee, so we must look to England for

the perfection of tea. The tea-kettle is as much an English institution

as aristocracy or the Prayer-Book; and when one wants to know exactly

how tea should be made, one has only to ask how a fine old English

housekeeper makes it.

The first article of her faith is that the water must not merely be hot,

not merely _have boiled_ a few moments since, but be actually _boiling_

at the moment it touches the tea. Hence, though servants in England are

vastly better trained than with us, this delicate mystery is seldom left

to their hands. Tea-making belongs to the drawing-room, and high-born

ladies preside at “the bubbling and loud-hissing urn,” and see that all

due rites and solemnities are properly performed,—that the cups are hot,

and that the infused tea waits the exact time before the libations

commence. O, ye dear old English tea-tables, resorts of the

kindest-hearted hospitality in the world! we still cherish your memory,

even though you do not say pleasant things of us there. One of these

days you will think better of us. Of late, the introduction of English

breakfast-tea has raised a new sect among the tea-drinkers, reversing

some of the old canons. Breakfast-tea must be boiled! Unlike the

delicate article of olden time, which required only a momentary infusion

to develop its richness, this requires a longer and severer treatment to

bring out its strength,—thus confusing all the established usages, and

throwing the work into the hands of the cook in the kitchen.

The faults of tea, as too commonly found at our hotels and

boarding-houses, are that it is made in every way the reverse of what it

should be. The water is hot, perhaps but not boiling; the tea has a

general flat, stale, smoky taste, devoid of life or spirit; and it is

served, usually, with thin milk, instead of cream. Cream is as essential

to the richness of tea as of coffee. We could wish that the English

fashion might generally prevail, of giving the traveller his own kettle

of boiling water and his own tea-chest, and letting him make tea for

himself. At all events, he would then be sure of one merit in his

tea,—it would be hot, a very simple and obvious virtue, but one very

seldom obtained.

Chocolate is a French and Spanish article, and one seldom served on

American tables. We, in America, however, make an article every way

equal to any which can be imported from Paris, and he who buys Baker’s

best vanilla-chocolate may rest assured that no foreign land can furnish

anything better. A very rich and delicious beverage may be made by

dissolving this in milk slowly boiled down after the French fashion.

* * * * *

I have now gone over all the ground I laid out, as comprising the great

first principles of cookery; and I would here modestly offer the opinion

that a table where all these principles are carefully observed would

need few dainties. The struggle after so-called delicacies comes from

the poorness of common things. Perfect bread and butter would soon drive

cake out of the field; it has done so in many families. Nevertheless, I

have a word to say under the head of _Confectionery_, meaning by this

the whole range of ornamental cookery,—or pastry, ices, jellies,

preserves, etc. The art of making all these very perfectly is far better

understood in America than the art of common cooking.

There are more women who know how to make good cake than good

bread,—more who can furnish you with a good ice-cream than a well-cooked

mutton-chop; a fair charlotte-russe is easier to come by than a perfect

cup of coffee, and you shall find a sparkling jelly to your dessert

where you sighed in vain for so simple a luxury as a well-cooked potato.

Our fair countrywomen might rest upon their laurels in these higher

fields, and turn their great energy and ingenuity to the study of

essentials. To do common things perfectly is far better worth our

endeavor than to do uncommon things respectably. We Americans in many

things as yet have been a little inclined to begin making our shirt at

the ruffle; but, nevertheless, when we set about it, we can make the

shirt as nicely as anybody,—it needs only that we turn our attention to

it, resolved, that, ruffle or no ruffle, the shirt we will have.

I have also a few words to say as to the prevalent ideas in respect to

French cookery. Having heard much of it, with no very distinct idea what

it is, our people have somehow fallen into the notion that its forte

lies in high spicing,—and so, when our cooks put a great abundance of

clove, mace, nutmeg, and cinnamon into their preparations, they fancy

that they are growing up to be French cooks. But the fact is, that the

Americans and English are far more given to spicing than the French.

Spices in our made dishes are abundant, and their taste is strongly

pronounced. In living a year in France I forgot the taste of nutmeg,

clove, and allspice, which had met me in so many dishes in America.

The thing may be briefly defined. The English and Americans deal in

_spices_, the French in _flavors_,—flavors many and subtile, imitating

often in their delicacy those subtile blendings which Nature produces in

high-flavored fruits. The recipes of our cookery-books are most of them

of English origin, coming down from the times of our phlegmatic

ancestors, when the solid, burly, beefy growth of the foggy island

required the heat of fiery condiments, and could digest heavy sweets.

Witness the national recipe for plum-pudding, which may be

rendered,—Take a pound of every indigestible substance you can think of,

boil into a cannon-ball, and serve in flaming brandy. So of the

Christmas mince-pie and many other national dishes. But in America,

owing to our brighter skies and more fervid climate, we have developed

an acute, nervous delicacy of temperament far more akin to that of

France than of England.

Half of the recipes in our cook-books are mere murder to such

constitutions and stomachs as we grow here. We require to ponder these

things, and think how we in our climate and under our circumstances

ought to live, and in doing so, we may, without accusation of foreign

foppery, take some leaves from many foreign books.

* * * * *

But Christopher has prosed long enough. I must now read this to my wife,

and see what she says.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

XI.

OUR HOUSE.

OUR gallant Bob Stephens, into whose life-boat our Marianne has been

received, has lately taken the mania of house-building into his head.

Bob is somewhat fastidious, difficult to please, fond of domesticities

and individualities; and such a man never can fit himself into a house

built by another, and accordingly house-building has always been his

favorite mental recreation. During all his courtship as much time was

taken up in planning a future house as if he had money to build one; and

all Marianne’s patterns, and the backs of half their letters, were

scrawled with ground-plans and elevations. But latterly this chronic

disposition has been quickened into an acute form by the falling-in of

some few thousands to their domestic treasury,—left as the sole residuum

of a painstaking old aunt, who took it into her head to make a will in

Bob’s favor, leaving, among other good things, a nice little bit of land

in a rural district half an hour’s railroad-ride from Boston.

So now ground-plans thicken, and my wife is being consulted morning,

noon, and night; and I never come into the room without finding their

heads close together over a paper, and hearing Bob expatiate on his

favorite idea of a library. He appears to have got so far as this, that

the ceiling is to be of carved oak, with ribs running to a boss over

head, and finished mediævally with ultramarine blue and gilding,—and

then away he goes sketching Gothic patterns of book-shelves which

require only experienced carvers, and the wherewithal to pay them, to be

the divinest things in the world.

Marianne is exercised about china-closets and pantries, and about a

bedroom on the ground-floor,—for, like all other women of our days, she

expects not to have strength enough to run up-stairs oftener than once

or twice a week; and my wife, who is a native genius in this line, and

has planned in her time dozens of houses for acquaintances, wherein they

are at this moment living happily, goes over every day with her pencil

and ruler the work of rearranging the plans, according as the ideas of

the young couple veer and vary.

One day Bob is importuned to give two feet off from his library for a

closet in the bedroom,—but resists like a Trojan. The next morning,

being mollified by private domestic supplications, Bob yields, and my

wife rubs out the lines of yesterday, two feet come off the library, and

a closet is constructed. But now the parlor proves too narrow,—the

parlor-wall must be moved two feet into the hall. Bob declares this will

spoil the symmetry of the latter; and if there is anything he wants, it

is a wide, generous, ample hall to step into when you open the

front-door.

“Well, then,” says Marianne, “let’s put two feet more into the width of

the house.”

“Can’t on account of the expense, you see,” says Bob. “You see every

additional foot of outside wall necessitates so many more bricks, so

much more flooring, so much more roofing, etc.”

And my wife, with thoughtful brow, looks over the plans, and considers

how two feet more are to be got into the parlor without moving any of

the walls.

“I say,” says Bob, bending over her shoulder, “here, take your two feet

in the parlor, and put two more feet on to the other side of the

hall-stairs”; and he dashes heavily with his pencil.

“O, Bob!” exclaims Marianne, “there are the kitchen-pantries! you ruin

them,—and no place for the cellar-stairs!”

“Hang the pantries and cellar-stairs!” says Bob. “Mother must find a

place for them somewhere else. I say the house must be roomy and

cheerful, and pantries and those things may take care of themselves;

they can be put _somewhere_ well enough. No fear but you will find a

place for them somewhere. What do you women always want such a great

enormous kitchen for?”

“It is not any larger than is necessary,” said my wife, thoughtfully;

“nothing is gained by taking off from it.”

“What if you should put it all down into a basement,” suggests Bob, “and

so get it all out of sight together?”

“Never if it can be helped,” said my wife. “Basement-kitchens are

necessary evils, only to be tolerated in cities where land is too dear

to afford any other.”

So goes the discussion till the trio agree to sleep over it. The next

morning an inspiration visits my wife’s pillow. She is up and seizes

plans and paper, and before six o’clock has enlarged the parlor very

cleverly, by throwing out a bow-window. So waxes and wanes the

prospective house, innocently battered down and rebuilt with

India-rubber and black-lead. Doors are cut out to-night, and walled up

to-morrow; windows knocked out here and put in there, as some observer

suggests possibilities of too much or too little draught. Now all seems

finished, when, lo, a discovery! There is no fireplace nor stove-flue in

my lady’s bedroom, and can be none without moving the bathing-room.

Pencil and India-rubber are busy again, and for a while the whole house

seems to threaten to fall to pieces with the confusion of the moving;

the bath-room wanders like a ghost, now invading a closet, now

threatening the tranquillity of the parlor, till at last it is laid by

some unheard-of calculations of my wife’s, and sinks to rest in a place

so much better that every body wonders it never was thought of before.

“Papa,” said Jenny, “it appears to me people don’t exactly know what

they want when they build; why don’t you write a paper on

house-building?”

“I have thought of it,” said I, with the air of a man called to settle

some great reform. “It must be entirely because Christopher has not

written that our young people and mamma are tangling themselves daily in

webs which are untangled the next day.”

“You see,” said Jenny, “they have only just so much money, and they want

everything they can think of under the sun. There’s Bob been studying

architectural antiquities, and nobody knows what, and sketching all

sorts of curly-whorlies; and Marianne has her notions about a parlor and

boudoir and china-closets and bedroom-closets; and Bob wants a baronial

hall; and mamma stands out for linen-closets and bathing-rooms and all

that; and so among them all it will just end in getting them head over

ears in debt.”

The thing struck me as not improbable.

“I don’t know, Jenny, whether my writing an article is going to prevent

all this; but as my time in the ‘Atlantic’ is coming round, I may as

well write on what I am obliged to think of, and so I will give a paper

on the subject to enliven our next evening’s session.”

So that evening, when Bob and Marianne had dropped in as usual, and

while the customary work of drawing and rubbing-out was going on at Mrs.

Crowfield’s sofa, I produced my paper and read as follows:—

OUR HOUSE.

There is a place called “Our House,” which everybody knows of. The

sailor talks of it in his dreams at sea. The wounded soldier, turning in

his uneasy hospital-bed, brightens at the word; it is like the dropping

of cool water in the desert, like the touch of cool fingers on a burning

brow. “Our house,” he says feebly, and the light comes back into his dim

eyes,—for all homely charities, all fond thoughts, all purities, all

that man loves on earth or hopes for in heaven, rise with the word.

“Our house” may be in any style of architecture, low or high. It may be

the brown old farm-house, with its tall well-sweep; or the one-story

gambrel-roofed cottage; or the large, square, white house, with green

blinds, under the wind-swung elms of a century; or it may be the

log-cabin of the wilderness, with its one room,—still there is a spell

in the memory of it beyond all conjurations. Its stone and brick and

mortar are like no other; its very clapboards and shingles are dear to

us, powerful to bring back the memories of early days, and all that is

sacred in home-love.

* * * * *

“Papa is getting quite sentimental,” whispered Jenny, loud enough for me

to hear. I shook my head at her impressively, and went on undaunted.

* * * * *

There is no one fact of our human existence that has a stronger

influence upon us than the house we dwell in,—especially that in which

our earlier and more impressible years are spent. The building and

arrangement of a house influence the health, the comfort, the morals,

the religion. There have been houses built so devoid of all

consideration for the occupants, so rambling and hap-hazard in the

disposal of rooms, so sunless and cheerless and wholly without snugness

or privacy, as to make it seem impossible to live a joyous, generous,

rational, religious family-life in them.

There are, we shame to say, in our cities _things_ called houses, built

and rented by people who walk erect and have the general air and manner

of civilized and Christianized men, which are so inhuman in their

building that they can only be called snares and traps for souls,—places

where children cannot well escape growing up filthy and impure,—places

where to form a home is impossible, and to live a decent, Christian life

would require miraculous strength.

A celebrated British philanthropist, who had devoted much study to the

dwellings of the poor, gave it as his opinion that temperance-societies

were a hopeless undertaking in London, unless these dwellings underwent

a transformation. They were so squalid, so dark, so comfortless, so

constantly pressing upon the senses foulness, pain, and inconvenience,

that it was only by being drugged with gin and opium that their

miserable inhabitants could find heart to drag on life from day to day.

He had himself tried the experiment of reforming a drunkard by taking

him from one of these loathsome dens, and enabling him to rent a

tenement in a block of model lodging-houses which had been built under

his supervision. The young man had been a designer of figures for

prints; he was of a delicate frame, and a nervous, susceptible

temperament. Shut in one miserable room with his wife and little

children, without the possibility of pure air, with only filthy, fetid

water to drink, with the noise of other miserable families resounding

through the thin partitions, what possibility was there of doing

anything except by the help of stimulants, which for a brief hour lifted

him above the perception of these miseries? Changed at once to a neat

flat, where, for the same rent as his former den, he had three good

rooms, with water for drinking, house-service, and bathing freely

supplied, and the blessed sunshine and air coming in through windows

well arranged for ventilation, he became in a few weeks a new man. In

the charms of the little spot which he could call home, its quiet, its

order, his former talent came back to him, and he found strength, in

pure air and pure water and those purer thoughts of which they are the

emblems, to abandon burning and stupefying stimulants.

The influence of dwelling-houses for good or for evil—their influence on

the brain, the nerves, and, through these, on the heart and life—is one

of those things that cannot be enough pondered by those who build houses

to sell or rent.

Something more generous ought to inspire a man than merely the

percentage which he can get for his money. He who would build houses

should think a little on the subject. He should reflect what houses are

for,—what they may be made to do for human beings. The great majority of

houses in cities are not built by the indwellers themselves,—they are

built _for_ them by those who invest their money in this way, with

little other thought than the percentage which the investment will

return.

For persons of ample fortune there are, indeed, palatial residences,

with all that wealth can do to render life delightful. But in that class

of houses which must be the lot of the large majority, those which must

be chosen by young men in the beginning of life, when means are

comparatively restricted, there is yet wide room for thought and the

judicious application of money.

In looking over houses to be rented by persons of moderate means, one

cannot help longing to build,—one sees so many ways in which the same

sum which built an inconvenient and unpleasant house might have been

made to build a delightful one.

* * * * *

“That’s so!” said Bob, with emphasis. “Don’t you remember, Marianne, how

many dismal, commonplace, shabby houses we trailed through?”

“Yes,” said Marianne. “You remember those houses with such little

squeezed rooms and that flourishing staircase, with the colored-glass

china-closet window, and no butler’s sink?”

“Yes,” said Bob; “and those astonishing, abominable stone abortions that

adorned the door-steps. People do lay out a deal of money to make houses

look ugly, it must be confessed.”

“One would willingly,” said Marianne, “dispense with frightful stone

ornaments in front, and with heavy mouldings inside, which are of no

possible use or beauty, and with showy plaster cornices and

centre-pieces in the parlor-ceilings, and even with marble mantels, for

the luxury of hot and cold water in each chamber, and a couple of

comfortable bath-rooms. Then, the disposition of windows and doors is so

wholly without regard to convenience! How often we find rooms, meant for

bedrooms, where really there is no good place for either bed or

dressing-table!”

Here my wife looked up, having just finished redrawing the plans to the

latest alteration.

“One of the greatest reforms that could be, in these reforming days,”

she observed, “would be to have women architects. The mischief with

houses built to rent is that they are all mere male contrivances. No

woman would ever plan chambers where there is no earthly place to set a

bed except against a window or door, or waste the room in entries that

might be made into closets. I don’t see, for my part, _apropos_ to the

modern movement for opening new professions to the female sex, why there

should not be well-educated female architects. The planning and

arrangement of houses, and the laying-out of grounds, are a fair subject

of womanly knowledge and taste. It is the teaching of Nature. What would

anybody think of a bluebird’s nest that had been built entirely by Mr.

Blue, without the help of his wife?”

“My dear,” said I, “you must positively send a paper on this subject to

the next Woman’s-Rights Convention.”

“I am of Sojourner Truth’s opinion,” said my wife,—“that the best way to

prove the propriety of one’s doing anything is to go and _do it_. A

woman who should have energy to go through the preparatory studies and

set to work in this field would, I am sure, soon find employment.”

“If she did as well as you would do, my dear,” said I. “There are plenty

of young women in our Boston high-schools who are going through higher

fields of mathematics than are required by the architect, and the

schools for design show the flexibility and fertility of the female

pencil. The thing appears to me altogether more feasible than many other

openings which have been suggested to woman.”

“Well,” said Jenny, “isn’t papa ever to go on with his paper?”

* * * * *

I continued:—

What ought “our house” to be? Could any other question be asked

admitting in its details of such varied answers,—answers various as the

means, the character, and situation of different individuals? But there

are great wants pertaining to every human being, into which all lesser

ones run. There are things in a house that every one, high or low, rich

or poor, ought, according to his means, to seek. I think I shall class

them according to the elemental division of the old philosophers,—Fire,

Air, Earth, and Water. These form the groundwork of this _need-be_,—the

_sine-qua-nons_ of a house.

* * * * *

“Fire, air, earth, and water! I don’t understand,” said Jenny.

“Wait a little till you do, then,” said I. “I will try to make my

meaning plain.”

* * * * *

The first object of a house is shelter from the elements. This object is

effected by a tent or wigwam which keeps off rain and wind. The first

disadvantage of this shelter is, that the vital air which you take into

your lungs, and on the purity of which depends the purity of blood and

brain and nerve, is vitiated. In the wigwam or tent you are constantly

taking in poison, more or less active, with every inspiration. Napoleon

had his army sleep without tents. He stated, that from experience, he

found it more healthy, and wonderful have been the instances of delicate

persons gaining constantly in vigor from being obliged, in the midst of

hardships, to sleep constantly in the open air. Now the first problem in

house-building is to combine the advantage of shelter with the fresh

elasticity of out-door air. I am not going to give here a treatise on

ventilation, but merely to say, in general terms, that the first object

of a house-builder or contriver should be to make a healthy house; and

the first requisite of a healthy house is a pure, sweet, elastic air.

I am in favor, therefore, of those plans of house-building which have

wide central spaces, whether halls or courts, into which all the rooms

open, and which necessarily preserve a body of fresh air for the use of

them all. In hot climates this is the object of the central court which

cuts into the body of the house, with its fountain and flowers, and its

galleries, into which the various apartments open. When people are

restricted for space, and cannot afford to give up wide central portions

of the house for the mere purposes of passage, this central hall can be

made a pleasant sitting-room. With tables, chairs, bookcases, and sofas

comfortably disposed, this ample central room above and below is, in

many respects, the most agreeable lounging-room of the house; while the

parlors below and the chambers above, opening upon it, form agreeable

withdrawing-rooms for purposes of greater privacy.

House and Home Papers Seventh Edition · 第 14 / 19 段