“For that matter,” said I, “the history of all wars has shown women

ready to sacrifice what is most intimately feminine in times of peril to

their country. The women of Carthage not only gave up their jewels in

the siege of their city, but, in the last extremity, cut off their hair

for bow-strings. The women of Hungary and Poland, in their country’s

need, sold their jewels and plate and wore ornaments of iron and lead.

In the time of our own Revolution, our women dressed in plain homespun

and drank herb-tea,—and certainly nothing is more feminine than a cup of

tea. And in this very struggle, the women of the Southern States have

cut up their carpets for blankets, have borne the most humiliating

retrenchments and privations of all kinds without a murmur. So let us

exonerate the female sex of want of patriotism, at any rate.”

“Certainly,” said my wife; “and if our Northern women have not

retrenched and made sacrifices, it has been because it has not been

impressed on them that there is any particular call for it. Everything

has seemed to be so prosperous and plentiful in the Northern States,

money has been so abundant and easy to come by, that it has really been

difficult to realize that a dreadful and destructive war was raging.

Only occasionally, after a great battle, when the lists of the killed

and wounded have been sent through the country, have we felt that we

were making a sacrifice. The women who have spent such sums for laces

and jewels and silks have not had it set clearly before them why they

should not do so. The money has been placed freely in their hands, and

the temptation before their eyes.”

“Yes,” said Jenny, “I am quite sure that there are hundreds who have

been buying foreign goods, who would not do it, if they could see any

connection between their not doing it and the salvation of the country;

but when I go to buy a pair of gloves, I naturally want the best pair I

can find, the pair that will last the longest and look the best, and

these always happen to be French gloves.”

“Then,” said Miss Featherstone, “I never could clearly see why people

should confine their patronage and encouragement to works of their own

country. I’m sure the poor manufacturers of England have shown the very

noblest spirit with relation to our cause, and so have the silk-weavers

and artisans of France,—at least, so I have heard; why should we not

give them a fair share of encouragement, particularly when they make

things that we are not in circumstances to make, have not the means to

make?”

“Those are certainly sensible questions,” I replied, “and ought to meet

a fair answer, and I should say, that, were our country in a fair

ordinary state of prosperity, there would be no reason why our wealth

should not flow out for the encouragement of well-directed industry in

any part of the world; from this point of view we might look on the

whole world as our country, and cheerfully assist in developing its

wealth and resources. But our country is now in the situation of a

private family whose means are absorbed by an expensive sickness,

involving the life of its head; just now it is all we can do to keep the

family together, all our means are swallowed up by our own domestic

wants, we have nothing to give for the encouragement of other families,

we must exist ourselves, we must get through this crisis and hold our

own, and that we may do it all the family expenses must be kept within

ourselves as far as possible. If we drain off all the gold of the

country to send to Europe to encourage her worthy artisans, we produce

high prices and distress among equally worthy ones at home, and we

lessen the amount of our resources for maintaining the great struggle

for national existence. The same amount of money which we pay for

foreign luxuries, if passed into the hands of our own manufacturers and

producers, becomes available for the increasing expenses of the war.”

“But, papa,” said Jenny, “I understood that a great part of our

Governmental income was derived from the duties on foreign goods, and so

I inferred that the more foreign goods were imported the better it would

be.”

“Well, suppose,” said I, “that for every hundred thousand dollars we

send out of the country we pay the Government ten thousand; that is

about what our gain as a nation would be;—we send our gold abroad in a

great stream, and give our Government a little driblet.”

“Well, but,” said Miss Featherstone, “_what can be got in America_?

Hardly anything, I believe, except common calicoes.”

“Begging your pardon, my dear lady,” said I, “there is where you and

multitudes of others are greatly mistaken. Your partiality for foreign

things has kept you ignorant of what you have at home. Now I am not

blaming the love of foreign things; it is not peculiar to us Americans;

all nations have it. It is a part of the poetry of our nature to love

what comes from afar, and reminds us of lands distant and different from

our own. The English belles seek after French laces; the French beauty

enumerates English laces among her rarities; and the French dandy piques

himself upon an English tailor. We Americans are great travellers, and

few people travel, I fancy, with more real enjoyment than we; our

domestic establishments, as compared with those of the Old World, are

less cumbrous and stately, and so our money is commonly in hand as

pocket-money, to be spent freely and gayly in our tours abroad.

“We have such bright and pleasant times in every country that we

conceive a kindliness for its belongings. To send to Paris for our

dresses and our shoes and our gloves may not be a mere bit of foppery,

but a reminder of the bright, pleasant hours we have spent in that city

of Boulevards and fountains. Hence it comes, in a way not very blamable,

that many people have been so engrossed with what can be got from abroad

that they have neglected to inquire what can be found at home; they have

supposed, of course, that to get a decent watch they must send to Geneva

or to London,—that to get thoroughly good carpets they must have the

English manufacture,—that a really tasteful wall-paper could be found

only in Paris,—and that flannels and broadcloths could come only from

France, Great Britain, or Germany.”

“Well, isn’t it so?” said Miss Featherstone. “I certainly have always

thought so; I never heard of American watches, I’m sure.”

“Then,” said I, “I’m sure you can’t have read an article that you should

have read on the Waltham watches, written by our friend George W.

Curtis, in the “Atlantic” for January of last year. I must refer you to

that to learn that we make in America watches superior to those of

Switzerland or England, bringing into the service machinery and modes of

workmanship unequalled for delicacy and precision; as I said before, you

must get the article and read it, and if some sunny day you could make a

trip to Waltham, and see the establishment, it would greatly assist your

comprehension.”

“Then, as to men’s clothing,” said Bob, “I know to my entire

satisfaction that many of the most popular cloths for men’s wear are

actually American fabrics baptized with French and English names to make

them sell.”

“Which shows,” said I, “the use of a general community movement to

employ American goods. It will change the fashion. The demand will

create the supply. When the leaders of fashion are inquiring for

American instead of French and English fabrics, they will be surprised

to find what nice American articles there are. The work of our own hands

will no more be forced to skulk into the market under French and English

names, and we shall see, what is really true, that an American gentleman

need not look beyond his own country for a wardrobe befitting him. I am

positive that we need not seek broadcloth or other woollen goods from

foreign lands,—that _better_ hats are made in America than in Europe,

and better boots and shoes; and I should be glad to send an American

gentleman to the World’s Fair dressed from top to toe in American

manufactures, with an American watch in his pocket, and see if he would

suffer in comparison with the gentlemen of any other country.”

“Then, as to house-furnishing,” began my wife, “American carpets are

getting to be every way equal to the English.”

“Yes,” said I, “and what is more, the Brussels carpets of England are

woven on looms invented by an American, and bought of him. Our

countryman, Bigelow, went to England to study carpet-weaving in the

English looms,—supposing that all arts were generously open for the

instruction of learners. He was denied the opportunity of studying the

machinery and watching the processes by a short-sighted jealousy. He

immediately sat down with a yard of carpeting, and, patiently

unravelling it, thread by thread, combined and calculated till he

invented the machinery on which the best carpets of the Old and New

World are woven. No pains which such ingenuity and energy can render

effective are spared to make our fabrics equal those of the British

market, and we need only to be disabused of the old prejudice, and to

keep up with the movement of our own country, and find out our own

resources. The fact is, every year improves our fabrics. Our mechanics,

our manufacturers, are working with an energy, a zeal, and a skill that

carry things forward faster than anybody dreams of; and nobody can

predicate the character of American articles, in any department, now, by

their character even five years ago.”

“Well, as to wall-papers,” said Miss Featherstone, “there you must

confess the French are and must be unequalled.”

“I do not confess any such thing,” said I, hardily. “I grant you that in

that department of paper-hangings which exhibits floral decoration the

French designs and execution are and must be for some time to come far

ahead of all the world,—their drawing of flowers, vines, and foliage has

the accuracy of botanical studies and the grace of finished works of

art, and we cannot as yet pretend in America to do anything equal to it.

But for satin finish, and for a variety of exquisite tints of plain

colors, American papers equal any in the world; our gilt papers even

surpass in the heaviness and polish of the gilding those of foreign

countries; and we have also gorgeous velvets. All I have to say is, let

people who are furnishing houses inquire for articles of American

manufacture, and they will be surprised at what they will see. We need

go no farther than our Cambridge glass-works to see that the most dainty

devices of cut-glass, crystal, ground and engraved glass of every color

and pattern, may be had of American workmanship, every way equal to the

best European make, and for half the price. And American painting on

china is so well executed both in Boston and New York, that deficiencies

in the finest French or English sets can be made up in a style not

distinguishable from the original, as one may easily see by calling on

our worthy next neighbor, Briggs, who holds the opposite corner to our

“Atlantic Monthly.” No porcelain, it is true, is yet made in America,

these decorative arts being exercised on articles imported from Europe.

Our tables must, therefore, per force, be largely indebted to foreign

lands for years to come. Exclusive of this item, however, I believe it

would require very little self-denial to paper, carpet, and furnish a

house entirely from the manufactures of America. I cannot help saying

one word here in favor of the cabinet-makers of Boston. There is so much

severity of taste, such a style and manner about the best made Boston

furniture, as raises it really quite into the region of the fine arts.

Our artisans have studied foreign models with judicious eyes, and so

transferred to our country the spirit of what is best worth imitating,

that one has no need to import furniture from Europe.”

“Well,” said Miss Featherstone, “there is one point you cannot make

out,—gloves; certainly the French have the monopoly of that article.”

“I am not going to ruin my cause by asserting too much,” said I. “I

haven’t been with nicely dressed women so many years not to speak with

proper respect of Alexander’s gloves,—and I confess, honestly, that to

forego them must be a fair, square sacrifice to patriotism. But then, on

the other hand, it is nevertheless true that gloves have long been made

in America and surreptitiously brought into market as French. I have

lately heard that very nice kid gloves are made at Watertown and in

Philadelphia. I have only heard of them, and not seen. A loud demand

might bring forth an unexpected supply from these and other sources. If

the women of America were bent on having gloves made in their own

country, how long would it be before apparatus and factories would

spring into being? Look at the hoop-skirt factories,—women wanted

hoop-skirts,—would have them or die,—and forthwith factories arose, and

hoop-skirts became as the dust of the earth for abundance.”

“Yes,” said Miss Featherstone, “and, to say the truth, the American

hoop-skirts are the only ones fit to wear. When we were living on the

Champs Élysées, I remember we searched high and low for something like

them, and finally had to send home to America for some.”

“Well,” said I, “that shows what I said. Let there be only a hearty call

for an article, and it will come. These spirits of the vasty deep are

not so very far off, after all, as we may imagine, and women’s unions

and leagues will lead to inquiries and demands which will as infallibly

bring supplies as a vacuum will create a draught of air.”

“But, at least, there are no ribbons made in America,” said Miss

Featherstone.

“Pardon, my lady, there is a ribbon-factory now in operation in Boston,

and ribbons of every color are made in New York; there is also in the

vicinity of Boston a factory which makes Roman scarfs. This shows that

the faculty of weaving ribbons is not wanting to us Americans, and a

zealous patronage would increase the supply.

“Then, as for a thousand and one little feminine needs, I believe our

manufacturers can supply them. The Portsmouth Steam Company makes white

spool-cotton equal to any in England, and colored spool-cotton, of every

shade and variety, such as is not made either in England or France. Pins

are well made in America; so are hooks and eyes, and a variety of

buttons. Straw bonnets of American manufacture are also extensively in

market, and quite as pretty ones as the double-priced ones which are

imported.

“As to silks and satins, I am not going to pretend that they are to be

found here. It is true, there are silk manufactories, like that of the

Cheneys in Connecticut, where very pretty foulard dress-silks are made,

together with sewing-silk enough to supply a large demand. Enough has

been done to show that silks might be made in America; but at present,

as compared with Europe, we claim neither silks nor thread laces among

our manufactures.

“But what then? These are not necessaries of life. Ladies can be very

tastefully dressed in other fabrics besides silks. There are many pretty

American dress-goods which the leaders of fashion might make

fashionable; and certainly no leader of fashion could wish to dress for

a nobler object than to aid her country in deadly peril.

“It is not a life-pledge, not a total abstinence, that is asked,—only a

temporary expedient to meet a stringent crisis. We only ask a preference

for American goods where they can be found. Surely, women whose

exertions in Sanitary Fairs have created an era in the history of the

world will not shrink from so small a sacrifice for so obvious a good.

“Here is something in which every individual woman can help. Every woman

who goes into a shop and asks for American goods renders an appreciable

aid to our cause. She expresses her opinion and her patriotism; and her

voice forms a part of that demand which shall arouse and develop the

resources of her country. We shall learn to know our own country. We

shall learn to respect our own powers,—and every branch of useful labor

will spring and flourish under our well-directed efforts. We shall come

out of our great contest, not bedraggled, ragged, and poverty-stricken,

but developed, instructed, and rich. Then will we gladly join with other

nations in the free interchange of manufactures, and gratify our eye and

taste with what is foreign, while we can in turn send abroad our own

productions in equal ratio.”

“Upon my word,” said Miss Featherstone, “I should think it was the

Fourth of July,—but I yield the point. I am convinced; and henceforth

you will see me among the most stringent of the leaguers.”

“Right!” said I.

And, fair lady-reader, let me hope you will say the same. You can do

something for your country,—it lies right in your hand. Go to the shops,

determined on supplying your family and yourself with American goods.

Insist on having them; raise the question of origin over every article

shown to you. In the Revolutionary times, some of the leading matrons of

New England gave parties where the ladies were dressed in homespun and

drank sage-tea. Fashion makes all things beautiful, and you, my charming

and accomplished friend, can create beauty by creating fashion. What

makes the beauty of half the Cashmere shawls? Not anything in the shawls

themselves, for they often look coarse and dingy and barbarous. It is

the association with style and fashion. Fair lady, give style and

fashion to the products of your own country,—resolve that the money in

your hand shall go to your brave brothers, to your co-Americans, now

straining every nerve to uphold the nation, and cause it to stand high

in the earth. What are you without your country? As Americans you can

hope for no rank but the rank of your native land, no badge of nobility

but her beautiful stars. It rests with this conflict to decide whether

those stars shall be badges of nobility to you and your children in all

lands. Women of America, your country expects every woman to do her

duty!

------------------------------------------------------------------------

VIII.

ECONOMY.

“THE fact is,” said Jenny, as she twirled a little hat on her hand,

which she had been making over, with nobody knows what of bows and

pompons, and other matters for which the women have curious names,—“the

fact is, American women and girls must learn to economize; it isn’t

merely restricting one’s self to American goods, it is general economy,

that is required. Now here’s this hat,—costs me only three dollars, all

told; and Sophie Page bought an English one this morning at Madame

Meyer’s for which she gave fifteen. And I really don’t think hers has

more of an air than mine. I made this over, you see, with things I had

in the house, bought nothing but the ribbon, and paid for altering and

pressing, and there you see what a stylish hat I have!”

“Lovely! admirable!” said Miss Featherstone. “Upon my word, Jenny, you

ought to marry a poor parson; you would be quite thrown away upon a rich

man.”

“Let me see,” said I. “I want to admire intelligently. That isn’t the

hat you were wearing yesterday?”

“O no, papa! This is just done. The one I wore yesterday was my

waterfall-hat, with the green feather; this, you see, is an oriole.”

“A what?”

“An oriole. Papa, how can you expect to learn about these things?”

“And that plain little black one, with the stiff crop of scarlet

feathers sticking straight up?”

“That’s my jockey, papa, with a plume _en militaire_.”

“And did the waterfall and the jockey cost anything?”

“They were very, very cheap, papa, all things considered. Miss

Featherstone will remember that the waterfall was a great bargain, and I

had the feather from last year; and as to the jockey, that was made out

of my last year’s white one, dyed over. You know, papa, I always take

care of my things, and they last from year to year.”

“I do assure you, Mr. Crowfield,” said Miss Featherstone, “I never saw

such little economists as your daughters; it is perfectly wonderful what

they contrive to dress on. How they manage to do it I’m sure I can’t

see. I never could, I’m convinced.”

“Yes,” said Jenny, “I’ve bought but just one new hat. I only wish you

could sit in church where we do, and see those Miss Fielders. Marianne

and I have counted six new hats apiece of those girls’,—_new_, you know,

just out of the milliner’s shop; and last Sunday they came out in such

lovely puffed tulle bonnets! Weren’t they lovely, Marianne? And next

Sunday, I don’t doubt, there’ll be something else.”

“Yes,” said Miss Featherstone,—“their father, they say, has made a

million dollars lately on Government contracts.”

“For my part,” said Jenny, “I think such extravagance, at such a time as

this, is shameful.”

“Do you know,” said I, “that I’m quite sure the Misses Fielder think

they are practising rigorous economy?”

“Papa! Now there you are with your paradoxes! How can you say so?”

“I shouldn’t be afraid to bet a pair of gloves, now,” said I, “that Miss

Fielder thinks herself half ready for translation, because she has

bought only six new hats and a tulle bonnet so far in the season. If it

were not for her dear bleeding country, she would have had thirty-six,

like the Misses Sibthorpe. If we were admitted to the secret councils of

the Fielders, doubtless we should perceive what temptations they daily

resist; how perfectly rubbishy and dreadful they suffer themselves to

be, because they feel it important now, in this crisis, to practise

economy; how they abuse the Sibthorpes, who have a new hat every time

they drive out, and never think of wearing one more than two or three

times; how virtuous and self-denying they feel, when they think of the

puffed tulle, for which they only gave eighteen dollars, when Madame

Caradori showed them those lovely ones, like the Misses Sibthorpe’s, for

forty-five; and how they go home descanting on virgin simplicity, and

resolving that they will not allow themselves to be swept into the

vortex of extravagance, whatever other people may do.”

“Do you know,” said Miss Featherstone, “I believe your papa is right? I

was calling on the oldest Miss Fielder the other day, and she told me

that she positively felt ashamed to go looking as she did, but that she

really did feel the necessity of economy. ‘Perhaps we might afford to

spend more than some others,’ she said; ‘but it’s so much better to give

the money to the Sanitary Commission!’”

“Furthermore,” said I, “I am going to put forth another paradox, and say

that very likely there are some people looking on my girls, and

commenting on them for extravagance in having three hats, even though

made over, and contrived from last year’s stock.”

“They can’t know anything about it, then,” said Jenny, decisively; “for,

certainly, nobody can be decent, and invest less in millinery than

Marianne and I do.”

House and Home Papers Seventh Edition · 第 8 / 19 段