NIETZSCHE'S DISCIPLES

It is said that barking dogs do not bite, and this being true, we must

look upon Nietzsche's philosophy as a harmless display of words and a

burning desire for power without making any attempt to practice what

he preached. His philosophy, so far as he is concerned, is a purely

Platonic love of an unattainable star whose brilliance dazzled the

imagination of a childlike peaceful weakling. Suppose, however, for

argument's sake, that Nietzsche had been a man of robust health, and

that he had been born at the time of great disturbances, offering

unlimited chances to an unscrupulous ambition, would he under these

circumstances have led the life he preached, and in case he had done

so, would he have boldly and unreservedly admitted his principles while

carrying out his plans? Did ever Cæsar or Napoleon or any usurper,

such as Richard III, who unscrupulously aspired for power, own that he

would shrink from nothing to attain his aim? Such a straightforward

policy for any schemer would be the surest way of missing his aim.

Such men, on the contrary, have played hypocrites, and have pretended

to cherish ideals generally approved by the large masses of the people

whom Nietzsche calls the herd. So it is obvious that the philosophy

of Nietzsche if it were ever practically applied, would have become a

secret doctrine known only to the initiated few, while the broad masses

would be misguided by some demonstrative show of moral principles that

might be pleasing to the multitudes and yet at the same time conceal

the real tendency of the overman to gain possession of his superior

position.

Nietzsche's influence upon professional philosophers is comparatively

weak. Whenever mentioned by them, it is in criticism, and he is

generally set aside as onesided, and perhaps justly, because he was

truly no philosopher in the strict sense of the word. He was no

reasoner, no logician, and we can not, properly speaking, look upon

his philosophy as a system or even a systematized view of the world.

Nietzsche made himself the exponent of a tendency, and as such he has

his followers among large masses of those very people whom he despised

as belonging to the herds. As Nietzsche idealized this very quality

in which he was lacking, so his followers recruit themselves from the

ranks of those people who more than all others would be opposed to the

rule of the overman. His most ardent followers are among the nihilists

of Russia, the socialists and anarchists of all civilized countries.

The secret reason of attraction, perhaps unknown to themselves, seems

to be Nietzsche's defense of the blind impulse and the privilege which

he claims for the overman to be himself in spite of law and order and

morality, and also his contempt for rules, religious, philosophical,

ethical or even logical, that would restrict the great sovereign

passion for power.

Nietzsche's philosophy has taken a firm hold of a number of souls

who rebel against the social, the political, the religious, and even

the scientific, conditions of our civilization. Nietzsche is the

philosopher of protest, and, strange to say, while he himself is

aristocratic in his instincts, he appeals most powerfully to the masses

of the people.

Nietzsche's disciples are not among the aristocrats, not among the

scholars, not among the men of genius. His followers are among

the people who believe in hatred and hail him as a prophet of the

great deluge. His greatest admirers are anarchists, sometimes also

socialists, and above all those geniuses who have failed to find

recognition. Nietzsche's thought will prove veritable dynamite if it

should happen to reach the masses of mankind, the disinherited, the

uneducated, the proletariat, the Catilinary existences. Nietzsche's

philosophy is an intoxicant to those whom he despised most; they see in

him their liberator, and rejoice in his invectives.

Invectives naturally appeal to those who are as unthinking as the

brutes of the field, but feel the sufferings of existence as much as

do the beasts of burden. They are impervious to argument, but being

full of bitterness and envy they can be led most easily by any kind

of denunciations of their betters. Nietzsche hated the masses, the

crowd of the common people, the herd. He despised the lowly and had

a contempt for the ideals of democracy. Nevertheless, his style of

thought is such as to resemble the rant of the leaders of mobs, and

it is quite probable that in the course of time he will become the

philosopher of demagogues.

A great number of Nietzsche's disciples share their master's

eccentricities and especially his impetuosity. Having a contempt for

philosophy as the work of the intellect, they move mainly in the field

of political and social self-assertion; they are anarchists who believe

that the overman is coming in labor troubles, strikes, and through a

subversion of the authority of government in any form.

The best known German expounders of Nietzsche's philosophy have been

Rudolph Steiner and Alexander Tille.[1] Professor Henri Lichtenberger

of the University of Nancy was his interpreter in France,[2] and the

former editor of The Eagle and the Serpent, known under the pseudonym

of Erwin McCall, in England. This periodical, which flourished for a

short time only, characterized its own tendency as follows:

"_The Eagle and the Serpent_ is a bi-monthly journal of egoistic

philosophy and sociology which teaches that in social science altruism

spells damnation and egoism spells salvation. In the war against their

exploiters the exploited cannot hope to succeed till they act as a

unit, an 'ego.'"

A reader of _The Eagle and the Serpent_ humorously criticised the

egoistic philosophy as follows:

"Dear Eagle and Serpent.--I am one of those unreasonable

persons who see no irreconcilable conflict between egoism

and altruism. The altruism of Tolstoy is the shortest

road to the egoism of Whitman. The unbounded love and

compassion of Jesus made him conscious of being the son

of God, and that he and the Father were one. Could egoism

go further than this? I believe that true egoism and true

altruism grow in precisely equal degree in the soul, and

that the alleged qualities which bear either name and

attempt to masquerade alone without their respective

make-weights are shams and counterfeits. The real

desideratum is balance, and that cannot be permanently

preserved on one leg. However, you skate surprisingly well

for the time being on one foot, and I have enjoyed the

first performance so well that I enclose 60 cents for a

season-ticket--ERNEST H. CROSBY. Rhinebeck, N. Y., U. S.

A."

A German periodical _Der Eigene_, i. e., "he who is his own,"

announced itself as "a journal for all and nobody," and sounded "the

slogan of the egoists," by calling on them to "preserve their ownhood."

Another anarchistic periodical that stood under the influence of

Nietzsche appeared in Budapest,[3] Hungary, in German and Hungarian

under the name Ohne Staat, ("Without Government") as "the organ of

ideal anarchists," under the editorship of Karl Krausz.

Perhaps the most worthy exponent of Nietzsche in England to-day is his

translator Thomas Common. He does not consider himself an orthodox

Nietzsche apostle but thinks that Nietzsche has given the world a very

important revelation and that his new philosophy of history and his

explanation of the role of Christianity are among the most wonderful

discoveries since Darwin. At the same time Mr. Common pronounces

Nietzsche's doctrine of eternal recurrence "very foolish" and believes

his use of the terms "good" and "evil" so perverted that he was

frequently confused about them and so misled superficial readers. Mr.

Common published at regular intervals during the years 1903 to 1909

ten numbers of a small periodical entitled variously _Notes for Good

Europeans and The Good European Point of View_, and expects to resume

its publication soon. Its motto is from Nietzsche, "In a word--and it

shall be an honorable word--we are Good Europeans ... the heirs of

thousands of years of the European spirit." Its purpose is expressed in

its first number as follows: "Our general purpose is to spread the best

and most important knowledge relating to human well-being among those

who are worthy to receive it, with a view to reducing the knowledge

to practice, after some degree of unanimity has been attained.... As

Nietzsche's works, notwithstanding some limitations, exaggerations and

minor errors, embody the foremost philosophical thought of the age, it

will be one of our special objects to introduce these works to English

readers."

These numbers contain many bibliographical and other notes of interest

to friends or critics of the Nietzsche propaganda. Mr. Common has

published selections from Nietzsche's works under the title, _Nietzsche

as Critic, Philosopher, Poet and Prophet_.[4]

In America Nietzsche's philosophy is represented by a book of Ragnar

Redbeard, entitled _Might is Right, the Survival of the Fittest._[5]

The author characterizes his work as follows:

[Illustration: BUST OF NIETZSCHE, BY KLINGER.]

"This book is a reasoned negation of the Ten

Commandments--the Golden Rule--the Sermon on the

Mount--Republican Principles--Christian Principles--and

Principles' in general.

"It proclaims upon scientific evolutionary grounds,

the unlimited absolutism of Might, and asserts that

cut-and-dried moral codes are crude and immoral

inventions, promotive of vice and vassalage."

The author is a most ardent admirer of Nietzsche, as may be learned

from his verses made after the pattern of Nietzsche's poetry. He sings:

"There is no 'law' in heaven or earth that man must needs

obey! Take what you can, and all you can; and take it

while you--may.

"Let not the Jew-born Christ ideal unnerve you in the

fight. You have no 'rights,' except the rights you win

by--might.

"There is no justice, right, nor wrong; no truth, no good,

no evil. There is no 'man's immortal soul,' no fiery,

fearsome Devil.

"There is no 'heaven of glory:' No!--no 'hell where

sinners roast' There is no 'God the Father,' No!--no Son,

no 'Holy Ghost.'

"This world is no Nirvâna where joy forever flows. It is a

grewsome butcher shop where dead 'lambs' hang in--rows.

"Man is the most ferocious of all the beasts of prey. He

rangeth round the mountains, to love, and feast, and--slay.

"He sails the stormy oceans, he gallops o'er the plains,

and sucks the very marrow-bones of captives held

in--chains.

"Death endeth all for every man,--for every 'son of

thunder'; then be a lion (not a 'lamb') and--don't be

trampled under."

A valuable recent addition to the discussion of egoism is _The

Philosophy of Egoism_ by James L. Walker, (Denver, 1905).

We know of no American periodical which stands for Nietzsche's views,

except, perhaps, _The Lion's Paw_ (Chicago) which claims to follow no

one. In the last years of the nineteenth century Clarence L. Swartz

published at Wellesley, Mass., an egoistic periodical called the _I_.

This magazine is no longer in existence, but Mr. Swartz is very active

in the International Intelligence Institute whose aims are universal

language, universal nationality and universal peace. He still maintains

the same philosophical view which he held as editor of the _I_, but his

philosophical egoism has led him in far different paths from those of

Nietzsche--into the paths of peace and not of struggle. He expresses

his present conception as follows:

"In the last analysis there is no right but might. Such is the common

ordinary rule of every-day life, from which there is no escape, even

were escape desirable. Any attempt to overthrow or circumvent or

even dispute the exercise of this prerogative of the mighty is but to

assert or oppose a greater might. Expediency always dictates how might

should be exercised. Politically, I hold that the non-coercion of

the non-invasive individual is the part of wisdom. The individual is

supreme, and should be preserved as against society, for in no other

way can evolution perform its perfect work."

_The Free Comrade_ edited by J. Wm. Lloyd and Leonard Abbott, an

avowedly socialistic and individualistic paper, originally under the

sole editorship of Lloyd, stood for Nietzsche and his egoism, but can

no longer be said to do so.

[1] A. Tille, _Von Darwin bis Nietzsche_. R. Steiner, _Wahrheit und

Wissenschaft_; _Die Philosophie der Freiheit; and F. Nietzsche, ein

Kämpfer gegen seine Zeit_.

We have already mentioned the biography of Nietzsche published by the

philosopher's sister, Frau E. Förster-Nietzsche. A characterization,

disavowed by Nietzsche's admirers, was written by Frau Lou Andreas

Salome, under the title _F. Nietzsche in seinen Werken_. Other

works kindred in spirit are Schellwien's _Der Geist der neueren

Philosophie_, 1895, and Der Darwinismus, 1896; also Adolf Gerecke,

_Die Aussichtslosigkeit des Moralismus_; Schmitt, _An der Grenzscheide

zweier Weltalter_; Károly Krausz, _Nietzsche und seine Weltanschauung._

[2] Henri Lichtenberger, _La Philosophie de Nietzsche_. Paris, Alcan,

1898

[3] We may mention incidentally that a contributor to _Ohne Staat_

reproduced one of the Homilies of St Chrysostom, in which he harangues

after the fashion of the early Christian preachers against wealth

and power. The state's attorney, not versed in Christian patristic

literature, seized the issue and placed the man who quoted the old

Byzantine saint behind the prison bars. In the issue of Nov., 1898, Dr.

Eugen Heinrich Schmitt mentions the case and says: "Thus we have an

exact and historical proof that the liberty of speech and thought was

incomparably greater in miserable, servile Byzantium than it is now in

the much more miserable and more servile despotism of modern Europe."

Does not Dr. Schmitt overlook the fact that in the days of Byzantine

Christianity the saints were protected by the mob, which was much

feared by the imperial government and was kept at bay only by a nominal

recognition of its claims and beliefs?

[4] Other recent English Nietzschean literature is as follows: Grace

Neal Dolson, _The Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche_, 1901; Oscar Levy,

_The Revival of Aristocracy_, 1906; A. R. Orage, _Fried. Nietzsche,

the Dionysion Spirit of the Age_, 1906; A. R. Orage, _Nietzsche in

Outline and Alphorism_; Henry L. Mencken, _The Philosophy of Friedrich

Nietzsche_; M. A. Mügge, _Friedrich Nietzsche: His Life and Work_;

Anthony M. Ludovici, _Who Is to Be Master of the World_?

[5] Published by Adolph Mueller, Chicago.

Nietzsche and Other Exponents of Individualism · 第 18 / 24 题