CARBONIC ACID IN THE AIR.

[Footnote: An address before the Paris Academy.]

By M. DUMAS.

Of all the gases that the atmosphere contains, there is one which offers

a special interest, as well on account of the part ascribed to it in

the mutual interchange going on between the two organic kingdoms, as

on account of the relation that it has been observed to occupy between

earth, air, and water; this gas is carbonic acid.

Ever since the fact has been established that animals consume oxygen

and give out carbonic acid as the product of respiration, while plants

consume carbonic acid and give out oxygen, the question has often been

asked whether the quantity of carbonic acid contained in the air did not

represent a sort of sustaining reservoir which was being continually

drawn on by the plants and resupplied by animals, so that it has

doubtless remained unchanged owing to this double action.

On the other hand, Boussingault has long since shown that volcanic

regions give out through crevices and fumaroles enormous quantities of

carbonic acid. The deposition of carbonate of lime that is continually

taking place on the sea-bottom is, on the other hand, fixing carbonic

acid in quantities which we may accurately estimate from the strata of

limestone seen on the surface of the earth. We might imagine, that in

comparison with the huge volumes of carbonic acid sent forth in volcanic

districts, even in the oldest one, and the mass of carbonate of lime

deposited on the sea bottom, the results attributed to the life of

plants and animals would be of no consequence either for increasing or

diminishing the physiological carbonic acid in the air comparable with

those which are accomplished by the purely geological exchange.

Schloesing has recently succeeded, by a happy application of the

principle of dissociation, in showing that the amount of carbonic acid

in the air bears a direct relation to the quantity of bicarbonate

of lime dissolved in sea water. If the quantity of carbonic acid

diminishes, the bicarbonate of the water is decomposed, half of its

carbonic acid escapes into the atmosphere, and the neutral carbonate of

lime is precipitated. The aqueous vapor condensed from the air dissolves

part of the carbonic acid contained therein, and carries it along, when

it falls as rain upon the earth, and takes up there enough lime to form

the bicarbonate, which is thus carried back to the sea.

The physiological role of carbonic acid, its geognostic influence, and

its relations to most ordinary meteorological phenomena on the earth's

surface--all these contribute to give special weight to studies

concerned in the estimation of the normal quantity of carbonic acid in

the air.

Nevertheless, this estimation is attended with great difficulty. Not

everyone is able to take up such questions, and not all processes are

adapted to it. The first thought which would naturally arise would be to

inclose a known volume of air in a given vessel, and then determine its

carbonic acid by measuring or weighing it. In this way we should obtain

the exact relation between a volume of air and the volume of carbonic

acid in it, for any given moment, and in any given place. If, however,

this be done with a ten-liter flask, for example, it would only hold

3 c.c. of carbonic acid, weighing 6 milligrammes; and, whether it is

weighed or measured, the error may easily equal 10 per cent. of the real

value, hence no deductions could be drawn from the observed facts.

For this reason larger volumes of air were taken, and a current of air,

whose volume could be accurately measured by known methods, was passed

through condensers capable of retaining the carbonic acid. But in this

case the air must pass very slowly through it, so that the process may

last several hours; and since the air is continually in motion, owing to

vertical and horizontal currents, the experiment may be begun with the

air of one place, and concluded with air from a far distant spot. For

example, if an experiment lasting twenty-four hours was made in Paris

when the air moved but four meters per second (nine or ten miles per

hour), it might be begun with air from the Department of the Seine, and

end with air from the Department of the Rhone, or the Belgian frontier,

according to the direction of the wind.

So long as we had no analytical methods of sufficient delicacy to

estimate with certainty the hundredth, or at least the tenth of a

milligramme of carbonic acid, it was very difficult to determine the

quantity in the air at a given time and place. It is frequently possible

to analyze upon the plain air that has descended from the heights

above, and to examine by bright daylight the effect of night upon the

atmosphere.

Still other difficulties show themselves in such investigations. It

seems very easy to collect carbonic acid in potash tubes, and to

determine its amount from the increase in weight of the tubes; but,

alas! to how many sources of error is this method exposed. If the potash

has been in contact with any organic substance, it will absorb oxygen.

If the pumice that takes the place of the potash contains protoxide of

iron, it will also absorb oxygen. In both cases the oxygen increases the

weight of the carbonic acid.

Every experimenter who has been compelled to repeat the weighing of a

somewhat complicate piece of apparatus, with an interval of several

hours between, knows how many inaccuracies he is exposed to if he is

compelled to take into calculation the changes of temperature and

pressure, and the moisture on the surface of the apparatus. After

fighting all these difficulties, and frequently in vain, the

experimenter begins to mistrust every result that depends only on

difference in weight, and to prefer those methods whereby the substance

to be estimated can be isolated, so that it can be seen and handled,

weighed or measured, in a free state, and in its own natural condition.

The classical experiments of Thenard, of Th. de Saussure, of Messrs.

Boussingault, on the quantity of carbonic acid in the air, are well

known to every one: they need only to be organized, repeated, and

multiplied.

J. Reiset, who has conducted a long and tedious series of experiments on

this subject, has adopted a process that seems to offer every guarantee

of accuracy. The air that furnishes the carbonic acid is aspirated

through the absorption apparatus by two aspirators of 600 liters

capacity. The temperature and pressure of the air are carefully

measured. The carbonic acid is absorbed by baryta water in three bulb

apparatus. The last bulb, which serves as a check to control the

operation, remains clear, and proves that no binoxide of barium

is formed. The baryta water used is titrated before and after the

operation, and from the difference is calculated the quantity of

carbonate formed, and hence of the carbonic acid.

These tedious experiments, which varied in duration from 6 to 25 hours,

require at least two days of continuous labor. They were repeated

193 times by Reiset in 1872, 1873, and 1879. They were made in still

weather, and in violent winds and storms. The air was taken at the

sea-shore, in the middle of the fields, on the level earth, during

harvests, in the forests, and in Paris. Under such varied conditions,

the quantity of carbonic acid varied but little; the numbers obtained

were between 2.94 and 3.1, which may be taken as a general average of

the carbonic acid in the air.

The quantity of carbonic acid in the free atmosphere is tolerably

constant, which must necessarily be the case according to Schloesing's

proposed relation between the bi-carbonate of lime in the sea and the

carbonic acid in the air. The only cause that seems at all competent to

change the geological quantity of carbonic acid in the atmosphere is

the formation of fog. As the aqueous vapors condense, they collect the

carbonic acid; and the foggy air, as a rule, is more heavily laden with

this gas than ordinary air.

It is not surprising that there is less carbonic acid in the air

collected on clear summer days, in the midst of clover, etc., that is in

an active reducing furnace; if anything is surprising, it is that the

quantity of carbonic acid does not sink below 2.8.

It is also a matter for surprise that in Paris, among so many sources of

carbonic acid, the furnace fires, the respiration of men and animals,

and the spontaneous decomposition and decay of organic substances, the

quantity of carbonic acid does not exceed 3.5.

If, then, the great general mean of normal atmospheric carbonic acid

deviates but little from 2.9 or 3.0, it is not doubtful that under local

conditions, in closed places, and under exceptional meteorological

conditions, considerable variations may occur in these proportions. But

these variations do not affect the general laws of the composition of

the atmosphere.

There are two entirely distinct points from which the measurement of the

atmospheric carbonic acid may be contemplated.

The first consists in considering it as a geological element which

belongs to the gaseous envelope of the earth in general, and it leads us

to express the general relation of carbonic acid to the quantity of air,

as about three volumes in 10,000.

The second, which relates to accidental and local phenomena, to the

activity of man and beast, to the effect of fires and of decomposing

organic matter, to volcanic emanations, and finally to the action of

clouds and rain, permits us to recognize the changes which can occur

in air exposed to the influences mentioned, and to a certain extent

confined. Without denying that it is of interest from a meteorological

and hygienic standpoint, it does not take the same rank as first.

J. Reiset's experiments, by their number, accuracy, the large volumes

employed, and the interval of years that separate them, have definitely

established two facts on which the earth's history must depend: the

first is, that the percentage of carbonic acid in the air scarcely

changes; the second, that it differs but little from three

ten-thousandths by volume.

These results are fully confirmed by the results which were obtained by

Franz Schulze, in Rostock, in 1868, 1869, 1870, and 1871. The averages

which he got, with very small variation, were 2.8668 for 1869, 2.9052

for 1870, and 3.0126 for 1871.

More recently Muentz and Aubin have analyzed air collected on the plains

near Paris, on the Pic du Midi, and on the top of Puy-de-Dome. Their

results agree with those published by Reiset and Schulze.

The grand average of carbonic oxide in the air seems to be tolerably

fixed, but after this starting-point is established it remains to study

the variations that it is capable of, not from local causes, which are

of little importance, but from general causes connected with large

movements of the air. Upon this study, which demands the co-operation of

a definite number of observers stationed at different and distant

points of the earth, the experiments being made simultaneously and by

comparable methods.

M. Dumas called the attention of the Academy to this point, in

connection with its mission of selecting suitable stations for observing

the transit of Venus. The process and apparatus of Muentz and Aubin

offer the means adapted for making these experiments, and seem

sufficient to solve the problem which science proposes, of determining

the present quantity of carbonic acid in the air.

If these experiments yield satisfactory results, as we have good reasons

to believe they will, it is to be hoped that annual observations will be

made in properly-chosen places, so as to determine the variations which

may possibly take place in the relative quantity of atmospheric carbonic

acid during the coming century.--_Compt. Rend_., p. 589.

[Although this proposition was made by a Frenchman to his fellow

scientists, would it not be well for some American to accept the

challenge, and bring it before the coming meeting of the American

Association for the Advancement of Science, in the hope that we,

too, may contribute our mite of effort in the same direction?--_Ed.

Knowledge_.]

* * * * *

THE INFLUENCE OF AQUEOUS VAPOR ON THE EXPLOSION OF CARBONIC OXIDE AND

OXYGEN.

[Footnote: Read before the British Association, Southampton Meeting,

Section B, 1882.]

By HAROLD B. DIXON, M.A., Millard Lecturer in Chemistry, Balliol and

Trinity Colleges, Oxford.

Two years ago I had the honor of showing before the Chemical Section of

the British Association some experiments, in which a well-dried mixture

of carbonic oxide and oxygen was submitted to electric sparks without

exploding.[1] It was further shown that the introduction of a very

minute quantity of aqueous vapor into the non-explosive mixture was

sufficient to cause explosive combination between the gases when the

spark was passed. The hypothesis advanced to account for the observed

facts was that carbonic oxide does not unite directly with oxygen at

a high temperature, but only indirectly through the intervention of

water-vapor present, a molecule of water being decomposed by one of

carbonic oxide to form a molecule of carbonic acid and one of free

hydrogen, and the latter uniting with the oxygen to re-form a molecule

of water, which again undergoes the same cycle of changes, till all the

oxygen is transferred to the carbonic oxide:

Scientific American Supplement, No. 358, November 11, 1882 · 第 33 / 50 题