XII.

_MADAM,_

I am of your _Authors_ opinion, concerning self-activity or

self-motion,[1] _That what is Active of it self, can no more cease to

be active then to be_: And I have been always of this opinion, even

from the first beginning of my conceptions in natural Philosophy, as

you may see in my first Treatise of Natural Philosophy, which I put

forth eleven years since; where I say, That self-moving Matter is in a

Perpetual motion; But your _Author_ endeavors from thence to conclude,

That _Matter is not self active, because it is reducible to rest._ To

which I answer, That there is no such thing as Rest in Nature: Not do

I say, that all sorts of motions are subject to our senses, for those

that are subject to our sensitive Perceptions, are but gross Motions,

in comparison to those that are not subject to our exterior senses:

as for example; We see some bodies dilate, others consume, others

corrupt; yet we do not see how they dilate, nor how they consume, nor

how they corrupt: Also we see some bodies contract, some attract,

some condense, some consist, &c. yet we do not see their contracting,

attracting, condensing, consisting or retenting motions; and yet we

cannot say, they are not corporeal motions, because not subject to

our exterior senses; for if there were not contracting, attracting,

retenting or consistent corporeal self-motions, it had been impossible

that any creature could have been composed into one united figure,

much less stayed and continued in the same figure without a general

alteration. But your _Author_ says, _If Matter, as Matter, had Motion,

nothing would hold together, but Flints, Adamants, Brass, Iron, yea,

this whole Earth, would suddenly melt into a thinner substance then

the subtil Air, or rather it never had been condensated together to

this consistency we find it._ But I would ask him, what reason he can

give, that corporeal self-motion should make all matter rare and fluid,

unless he believe there is but one kind of motion in Nature, but this,

human sense and reason will contradict; for we may observe there are

Infinite changes of Motion, and there is more variety and curiosity in

corporeal motions, then any one single Creature can imagine, much less

know; but I suppose he conceives all corporeal matter to be gross, and

that not any corporeal motion can be subtil, penetrating, contracting

and dilating; and that whatsoever is penetrating, contracting and

dilating, is Individable: But by his leave, _Madam_, this doth not

follow; for though there be gross degrees of Matter, and strong degrees

of Corporeal Motions, yet there are also pure and subtil degrees

of Matter and Motions; to wit, that degree of Matter, which I name

sensitive and rational Matter, which is natural Life and Knowledg, as

sensitive Life and rational Knowledg. Again, your _Author_ askes, _What

glue or cement holds the parts of hard matter in Stones and Metals

together?_ I answer, Consistent or retentive corporeal motions, by an

agreeable union and conjunction in the several parts of Metal or Stone;

and these retentive or consistent motions, are as strong and active,

if not more, then some dilative or contractive motions; for I have

mentioned heretofore, that, as sensitive and rational corporeal motions

are in all Creatures, so also in Stone, Metal, and any other dense body

whatsoever; so that not any one Creature or part of Matter is without

Motion, and therefore not any thing is at rest. But, _Madam_, I dare

say, I could bring more reason and sense to prove, that sensitive and

rational Matter is fuller of activity, and has more variety of motion,

and can change its own parts of self-moving Matter more suddenly, and

into more exterior figures, then Immaterial Spirits can do upon natural

Matter. But your _Author_ says, That Immaterial Spirits are endued with

Sense and Reason; I say, My sensitive and rational corporeal Matter

is Sense and Reason it self, and is the Architect or Creator of all

figures of Natural matter, for though all the parts of Matter are not

self-moving, yet there is not any part that is not moving or moved, by

and with the mover, which is animate matter. And thus I conclude, and

rest constantly,

Madam,

_Your Faithful Friend_

_and Servant._

[1] _Of the Immortality of the Soul, l._ 1. _c._ 7.

Philosophical Letters: or, modest Reflections upon some Opinions in Natural Philosophy · 第 65 / 169 题