II.

_MADAM,_

Since I spake in my last of the adoration and worship of God, you

would faine know, whether we can have an Idea of God? I answer, That

naturally we may, and really have a knowledge of the existence of

God, as I proved in my former letter, to wit, that there is a God,

and, that he is the _Author_ of all things, who rules and governs all

things, and is also the God of Nature: but I dare not think, that

naturally we can have an Idea of the essence of God, so as to know what

God is in his very nature and essence; for how can there be a finite

Idea of an Infinite God? You may say, As well as of Infinite space. I

answer, Space is relative, or has respect to body, but there is not

any thing that can be compared to God; for the Idea of Infinite nature

is material, as being a material creature of Infinite material Nature.

You will say, How can a finite part have an Idea of infinite nature? I

answer, Very well, by reason the Idea is part of Infinite Nature, and

so of the same kind, as material; but God being an Eternal, Infinite,

Immaterial, Individable Being, no natural creature can have an Idea of

him. You will say, That the Idea of God in the mind is immaterial; I

answer, I cannot conceive, that there can be any immaterial Idea in

nature; but be it granted, yet that Immaterial is not a part of God,

for God is individable, and hath no parts; wherefore the Mind cannot

have an Idea of God, as it hath of Infinite nature, being a part of

nature; for the Idea of God cannot be of the essence of God, as the

Idea of nature is a corporeal part of nature: and though nature may be

known in some parts, yet God being Incomprehensible, his Essence can by

no wayes or means be naturally known; and this is constantly believed,

by

Madam,

_Your faithful Friend,_

_and Servant._

Philosophical Letters: or, modest Reflections upon some Opinions in Natural Philosophy · 第 55 / 169 题