“Michael Angelo, Raphael, and other Italian architects of the

Renaissance boldly aimed at restoring the antique. But in their time the

rage for painting became so prevalent, that instead of following these

great examples, they covered every ceiling with large fresco

compositions, which, though extremely fine and well painted, were very

much misplaced, and must necessarily, from the attitude in which they

are beheld, tire the patience of every spectator. Great compositions

should be placed so as to be viewed with ease. Grotesque ornaments and

figures in any situation are perceived with the glance of an eye, and

require little examination. Inigo Jones introduced them into England

with as much weight, but with little fancy and embellishment. Vanburgh,

Campbell, and Gibbs, followed too implicitly the authority of this great

name. Kent’s genius for the picturesque, and the vast reputation he

deservedly acquired, made him in some measure withstand this prevalent

abuse; he has much merit in being the first who began to lighten the

compartments and to introduce grotesque paintings with his ornament in

stucco; his works, however, are evidently those of a beginner. Mr.

Stuart, with his usual elegance and taste, has contributed greatly

towards introducing the true style of the antique decoration; and it

seems to have been reserved for the present times to see compartment

ceilings, and those of every kind, carried to a degree of perfection in

Great Britain that far surpasses any of the former attempts of other

modern nations.

“Inigo Jones, who had long studied in Italy, rescued this art

(architecture) in a considerable degree from the Gothicism of former

times, and began to introduce into his country a love of that elegance

and refinement which characterize the productions of Greece and Rome.

“Instructed and encouraged by his example, Sir Christopher Wren became

more chaste; and having the felicity to be employed in executing the

most magnificent work of English architecture, he was enabled to display

greater extent of genius.

“Vanburgh understood better than either the art of living among the

great. A commodious arrangement of apartments was therefore his peculiar

merit. But his lively imagination scorned the restraint of any rule in

composition; and his passion for what was fancifully magnificent,

prevented him from discerning what was truly simple, elegant, and

sublime.

“Campbell, Gibbs, and Kent have each their peculiar share of merit.”

From their own testimony we can, therefore, not agree with them, when

they write elsewhere:

“Inferior to our ancestors in science, we surpass them in taste.”

However, they insist that at the time they write, “greater variety of

form, greater beauty in design, greater gaiety, and elegance of ornament

are introduced into interior decoration.”

They were greatly in demand, as we have seen, and not only altered the

interiors and exteriors of many English mansions, but designed the

decorations. Chimney-pieces, ceilings, walls, niches, the handles of

doors, locks, key-plates, cornices, draperies, furniture, gold and

silver ware, and even damask for the table. Nothing seemed too great,

nor too slight for their hands. The attitude they had towards their work

may be appreciated by the following words:

“If we have any claim to approbation, we found it on this alone. That we

flatter ourselves we have been able to seize, with some degree of

success, the beautiful spirit of antiquity, and to transfuse it, with

novelty and variety, through all our numerous works.”

The pictures on Plates L., LI., and LII. are taken from the book by the

Adams. No. 1, on Plate L., is the curtain cornice of the Earl of Derby’s

Etruscan Room; No. 2 on the same plate is another cornice with drapery,

which, with the mirror below it, were made for Sion House. No. 4 is the

leg of a table and No. 5 is the upper part of the frame of a pier-glass.

The lower drawing is a sideboard table, under which, in the original

drawing, a wine-cooler stands. No. 3 is a table, also from Sion House.

The sofa appearing on Plate LI. is of mahogany, the woodwork fluted and

mounted with brass reliefs. The legs are characteristic of Adam. The

cover is woolen work on canvas.

The table on the same plate is inlaid and has a border of inlaid brass

and wood around the top. The two drawers under the top have borders of

brass and are decorated with brass lions. In the centre of each

crosspiece there is a decoration of leaves surrounding a rosette. The

legs are gilded at intervals, and are ornamented with gilt lion’s heads

and end in claw feet. This dates from about 1780.

The screen on the same plate is supported on a stand of wood fluted and

gilded, out of which rises a brass rod. The oval frame encloses a piece

of silk embroidery said to have been made by Queen Caroline. The little

picture in the centre is painted. No. 1 is a curtain cornice, of which

Adam says: “These curtains were intended as an attempt to banish absurd

French compositions.” No. 2 is a ewer, that also appears in the Adam

book. Plate XLIX. is a library after the Adam style. The full drawing on

Plate LII. is a commode from the Countess of Derby’s dressing-room; it

is richly decorated. No. 2 is a detail. No. 3 on the same plate from it

is a girandole, made for a niche in the Earl of Derby’s Etruscan Room.

The full drawing is “a design of a vase for candles to be fixed to the

wainscoting of a room”; the central vase is a perfume-burner. No. 1 is a

tripod of gilded wood, intended to support a base with candles.

Among the ornaments used by the Adam brothers were mythological

subjects, lozenge-shaped panels, octagons, ovals, hexagons, circles,

wreaths, fans, husks, medallions, draped medallions, medallions with

figures, the sphinx, the faun, goats, drapery, ribbons, eagle-headed

grotesques, griffins, sea-horses, the ram’s head, the patera, the

rosette, caryatides and other Classic motives.

The ornaments of the ceilings and walls were stucco picked out with

different tints, frequently pink and green. In handsome rooms, the

chimney-piece was of statuary marble, the overmantel carved in wood and

gilt, or painted. The drawing-room ceiling was coved and the

compartments painted. Pilasters were often used to divide the rooms and

the ornaments of these, like the arches and panels of the doors, were

painted. The frieze was stucco. Ornaments in the niches were frequently

gilt, as well as the girandoles and stucco ornaments of the ceilings.

The Adams also recommended ornaments printed on _papier maché_ and “so

highly japanned as to appear like glass.” Damask and tapestry were used

for hanging the drawing-room, but not the dining-room.

They assert that within the past few years there has been “a remarkable

improvement in the form, convenience, arrangement and relief of

apartments; a greater movement and variety, in the outside composition

and in the decoration of the inside, an almost total change. The massive

entablature, the ponderous compartment ceiling, the tabernacle frame

almost the only species of ornament, formerly known in this country, are

now universally exploded, and in their place we have adopted a beautiful

variety of light mouldings, gracefully formed, delicately enriched and

arranged with propriety and skill. We have introduced a great diversity

of ceilings, frieze and decorated pilasters, and have added grace and

beauty to the whole, by a mixture of grotesque[23] stucco and painted

ornaments, together with the flowing _rinceau_,[24] with its fanciful

figures and winding foliage.

“A proper arrangement and relief of apartments are branches of

architecture in which the French have excelled all other nations; these

have united magnificence with utility in the hôtels of their nobility,

and have rendered them objects of universal imitation.

[Illustration: PLATE LI]

“To understand thoroughly the art of living, it is necessary, perhaps,

to have passed some time among the French, and to have studied the

customs of that social and conversible people. In one particular,

however, our manners prevent us from imitating them. Their eating-rooms

seldom or never constitute a piece in their great apartments, but lie

out of the suite, and in fitting them up, little attention is paid to

beauty or decoration. The reason of this is obvious; the French meet

there only at meals, when they trust to the display of the table for

show and magnificence, not to the decoration of the apartment; and as

soon as the entertainment is over, they immediately retire to the rooms

of company. Not so with us. Accustomed by habit, or induced by the

nature of our climate, we indulge more largely in the enjoyment of the

bottle. Every person of rank here is either a member of the legislature,

or entitled by his condition to take part in the political arrangements

of his country, and to enter with ardour into those discussions to which

they give rise; these circumstances lead men to live more with one

another, and more detached from the society of the ladies. The

eating-rooms are considered as the apartments of conversation, in which

we are to pass a great part of our time. This renders it desirable to

have them fitted up with elegance and splendour, but in a style

different from that of other apartments. Instead of being hung with

damask, tapestry, etc., they are always finished with stucco, and

adorned with statues and paintings, that they may not retain the smell

of the victuals.”

The Adam brothers now describe what seems to them a correct arrangement

of a suite of apartments. These they themselves planned and decorated

for the Duke of Northumberland’s estate, Sion House, near London. “The

hall, both in our homes and in those of France, is a spacious apartment,

intended as the room of access where servants attend. It is here, a room

of great dimensions, is finished with stucco, as halls always are, and

formed with a recess at each end, one square and the other circular,

which have a noble effect and increase the variety.

“The ante-rooms on each side are for the attendance of the servants out

of livery, and also for that of the tradesmen, etc. These are relieved

by the back stairs in the towers. That on the side of the great

apartment is square, and is decorated with columns of verd antique

marble, which serve to form the room and heighten the scenery. The

ante-room, on the side of the private apartment, is formed into an oval,

a figure seldom or never used by the ancients, but has been sometimes

introduced by the moderns with success, and was here in some respect

necessary from the oblong shape of the room.

“Next to the ante-rooms are the public and private eating-rooms; the

public one is a room of great extent, finished with stucco and adorned

with niches and statues of marble; it is formed into a great circular

recess at each end and decorated with screens of columns. The private

one has also its recesses and stucco-finishing, and is relieved by a

back-stair for the use of the servants.

“Next to the great eating-room lies a splendid withdrawing room, for the

ladies, or _salle de compagnie_, as it is called by the French; this is

varied from the other rooms by the form of its ceiling, which is coved

and painted in compartments. It gives access into a gallery of great

length, though rather too narrow and too low to be in the just

proportion we could have wished. It is, however, finished in a style to

afford great variety and amusement, and is, for this reason, an

admirable room for the reception of company before dinner, or for the

ladies to retire to after it: For the withdrawing-room lying between

this and the eating-room, prevents the noise of the men from being

troublesome; and for this reason we would always recommend the

intervention of a room in great apartments to prevent such

inconvenience.

“The little closets or cabinets, the circular one for china, and the

other square one for miniatures, at each end of the gallery, serve only

for an additional ornament. The gallery itself, as well as the private

apartments, is relieved by the circular back stairs, and gives access to

the ranges of apartments on both sides.

“The great circular saloon is a noble room entering from the hall, and

leading into the gallery and great stairs, relieves all the other

apartments: this serves also for a room of general rendez-vous, and for

public entertainments, with illuminations, dancing and music. The form

is new and singular; it is a circle within a circle, the smaller opening

into the larger, by eight piercings adorned with columns and terminated

with niches and statues, so that the scenery, like the decorations of a

theatre, apparently increases the extent, and leaves room for the

imagination to play.

“The private apartments are now the only part of the plan remaining

undescribed; on one hand is the Duchess’s bed-chamber, an ante-chamber

for the attendance of her maid; her toilet or dressing-room, her

powdering-room, water-closet and outer ante-room, with a back stair

leading to the intersols for the maids’ bedrooms and wardrobes, etc. On

the other hand is a dressing-room for the Duke, a powdering-room,

writing-room, with closet and stairs to intersols for His Grace’s

valet-de-chambre, and wardrobe, etc.”

The Adams also made changes at Kenwood in 1774, introducing their plans

and decorations into an addition. “The great room with its ante-room was

begun by Lord Mansfield’s orders in 1767, and was intended both for a

library and a room for receiving company. The circular recesses were

therefore fitted up for the former purpose, and the square part or body

of the room was made suitable to the latter. The whole is reckoned

elegant in its proportions and decorations, and the ceiling in

particular, which is a segment of a circle, has been greatly admired.”

This ceiling is in “imitation of a flat arch, which is extremely

beautiful and much more perfect than that which is commonly called the

coved ceiling,” and Adam thus continues to describe it: “The stucco-work

of this ceiling and of the other decorations is finely executed by Mr.

Joseph Rose. The paintings are elegantly performed by Mr. Antonio

Zucchi, a Venetian painter of great eminence; and the grounds of the

panels and friezes are coloured with light tints of pink and green, so

as to take off the glare of white, so common in every ceiling till of

late. This always appeared to me so cold and unfinished, that I ventured

to introduce this variety of grounds, at once to relieve the ornaments,

remove the crudeness of the white, and create a harmony between the

ceiling and the side walls with their hangings, pictures and other

decorations.”

The Adams were very fond of this combination of colour. Osterley Park,

the seat of the Earl of Jersey and one of the finest specimens of the

Adam style extant, had its dining-room similarly painted by Zucchi. It

is thus described:

[Illustration: PLATE LII]

“The dining-room at Osterley Park, owned by the Earl of Jersey, was

decorated by Zucchi in the Adam style. The walls of this apartment are

in tints of the tenderest green and the very palest pinks, these colours

being panelled by delicate scroll-work and artistic designs in the white

composition which was known only to the Adam brothers. Three large

pictures and several smaller ones, all being scenes and landscapes by

Zucchi, are framed in this white scroll-work, while the same curving

lines, with grapes and vine leaves, outline the pink and green panels of

the ceilings, the design of which corresponds with the design of the

neutral-tinted carpet. The tiny scroll patterns of the window mouldings

are repeated in the ornamentation of the mahogany doors with their

artistic brass locks and are again found in the designs of the _buffets_

and side tables, where the ram’s head is introduced, which occurs more

than once in both furniture and ornaments. Even the tablecloths were

made to correspond in their woven pattern, and some are still in use

bearing the date 1779. This careful and minute arrangement of detail is

found only in an Adam House.”[25]

W. Thomas was another designer in the Adam style; but of far greater

importance was Michael Angelo Pergolesi, who was employed by the Adam

brothers, and whose designs are equal to theirs. Pergolesi also employed

Zucchi, Cipriani and Angelica Kauffman. His books of designs came out in

parts from 1777 onward. One of Pergolesi’s rooms “has a low dado rail,

plain plaster walls, panelled round with a moulding, a fine mantel-piece

and a narrow ornamental compo frieze and plain ceiling.” Angelica

Kauffman painted ceilings, table-tops, and furniture-panels, which, like

Cipriani’s productions, represent cherubs, maidens, gods and goddesses,

and _amorini_.

-----

Footnote 21:

Scagliola, mentioned above, was a kind of plaster made of gypsum and

Flanders glue. It was coloured to imitate marble. The Adam brothers

made great use of it, as well as plaster of Paris pressed in metal

moulds.

Footnote 22:

Cosmo Monkhouse.

Footnote 23:

“By _grotesque_ is meant that beautiful light stile of ornament used

by the ancient Romans in the decoration of the palaces, baths and

villas. It is also to be seen in some of their amphitheatres, temples

and tombs; the greatest part of which being vaulted and covered with

ruins, have been dug up and cleared by the modern Italians, who, for

these reasons, give them the name of _grotte_, which is perhaps a

corruption of the Latin _Criptæ_, a word borrowed from the Greeks, as

the Romans did most of their terms, in architecture; and hence the

word _grotesque_, and the English word signifying a cave.

“In the times of Raphael, Michael Angelo, Julio Romano, Polidoro,

Giov. d’Udine, Vasari, Zuchero and Algardi, there is no doubt but

there was much greater remains of the grotte, than what are now to be

seen, and in imitation of them were decorated the _loggias_ of the

Vatican, the villas Madama, Pamfili, Caprarola, the old palace at

Florence; and indeed whatever else is elegant and admirable in the

finishings of modern Italy. The French, who till of late never adopted

the ornaments of the ancients, and jealous as all mankind are of the

reputation of their national taste, have branded those ornaments with

the vague and fantastical appellation of arabesque, a stile which,

though entirely distinct from the grotesque, has, notwithstanding,

been most absurdly and universally confounded with it by the ignorant.

“This classical stile of ornament, by far the most perfect that has

ever appeared for inside decorations, and which has stood the test of

many ages, like other works of genius, requires not only fancy and

imagination in the composition, but taste and judgment in the

application; and when these are happily combined, this gay and elegant

mode is capable of inimitable beauties.

“Vitruvius with great reason condemns an over-licentiousness in

compositions of this kind, and blames the painters of his time for

introducing monstrous extravagances. We mean not to vindicate anything

that deserves such appellations, but surely in light and gay

compositions, designed merely to amuse, it is not altogether necessary

to exclude the whimsical and bizarre.”

Footnote 24:

“_Rainceau_, apparently derived from rain, an old French word,

signifying the branch of a tree. This French term is also used by the

artists of this country, to express the winding and twisting of the

stalk or stem of the acanthus plant, which flowing round in many

graceful turnings spreads its foliage with great beauty and variety,

and is often intermixed with human figures, animals and birds,

imaginary or real; also with flowers and fruits.

“This gay and fanciful diversity of agreeable objects, well composed

and delicately executed in stucco or painting, attains a wonderful

power of pleasing.”

Footnote 25:

E. Balch, _Glimpses of Old English Homes_.

THE HEPPELWHITE PERIOD

[Illustration: PLATE LIII]

[Illustration]

THE HEPPELWHITE PERIOD

Quite different from the sumptuous book by Robert and James Adam is the

one that was published in 1788 by the firm of “A. Heppelwhite & Co.,

Cabinet-Makers.” This is a collection of three hundred designs by

cabinet-makers for cabinet-makers and gentlemen. The title-page, which

is also a table of contents, reads as follows:

“The Cabinet-Maker and Upholsterer’s Guide, or Repository of Designs,

for every article of Household Furniture, in the Newest and most

approved Taste, displaying a great variety of patterns for Chairs,

Stools, Sofas, Confidante, Duchesse, Side Boards, Pedestal and Vases,

Cellerets, Knife-Cases, Desk and Book-Cases, Secretary and Book-Cases,

Library-Cases, Library-Tables, Reading-Desks, Chests-of-Drawers,

Urn-Stands, Tea-Caddies, Tea-Trays, Card-Tables, Pier-Tables,

Pembroke-Tables, Tambour-Tables, Dressing-Glasses, Dressing-Tables and

Drawers, Commodes, Rudd’s Table, Bidets, Night-Tables, Bason-Stands,

Wardrobes, Pot-Cupboards, Brackets, Hanging-Shelves, Fire-Screens, Beds,

Field-Beds, Sweep Tops for Ditto, Bed-Pillars, Candle-Stands, Lamps,

Pier-Glasses, Terms for Busts, Cornices for Library-Cases, Wardrobes,

etc., at large, Ornamented Tops for Pier-Tables, Pembroke-Tables,

Commodes, etc., etc., in the Plainest and most Enriched Styles.”

In his preface, Heppelwhite explains his ideas as follows:

“To unite elegance and utility, and blend the useful with the agreeable,

has ever been considered a difficult, but an honourable task.

“It may be allowable to say, we have exerted our utmost endeavours to

produce a work which shall be useful to the mechanic, and serviceable to

the gentleman. With this view, after having fixed upon such articles as

were necessary to a complete suit of furniture, our judgment was called

forth in selecting such patterns as were most likely to be of general

use—in choosing such points of view as would show them most

distinctly—and in exhibiting such fashions as were necessary to answer

the end proposed, and convey a just idea of English taste in furniture

for houses.

“English taste and workmanship have, of late years, been much sought for

by surrounding nations; and the mutability of all things, but more

especially of fashions, has rendered the labours of our predecessors in

this line of little use: nay, at this day, they can only tend to mislead

those Foreigners, who seek a knowledge of the English taste in the

various articles of household furniture.

[Illustration: PLATE LIV]

“The same reason, in favour of this work, will apply also to many of our

own Countrymen and Artisans, whose distance from the metropolis makes

even an imperfect knowledge of its improvements acquired with much

trouble and expense. Our labours will, we hope, tend to remove this

difficulty; and as our idea of the useful was such articles as are

generally serviceable in genteel life, we flatter ourselves the labour

and pains we have bestowed on this work will not be considered as time

uselessly spent.

“To Residents in London, though our drawings are all new, yet, as we

designedly followed the latest or most prevailing fashion only,

purposely omitting such articles whose recommendation was mere novelty,

and perhaps a violation of all established rule, the production of whim

at the instance of caprice, whose appetite must ever suffer

disappointment if any similar thing had been previously thought of; we

say, having regularly avoided those fancies, and steadily adhered to

such articles only as are of general use and service, our principal hope

for favour and encouragement will be, in having combined near three

hundred different patterns for furniture in so small a space, and at so

small a price. In this instance we hope for reward; and though we lay no

claim to extraordinary merit in our designs, we flatter ourselves they

will be found serviceable to young workmen in general and occasionally

to more experienced ones.”

From the above quotation, it will be noticed that the firm of

Heppelwhite and Company eschews extravagant designs, and aims to

represent at the same time what is newest and most fashionable. We see,

too, that previous publications sold, such as Chippendale’s, Ince and

Mayhew’s, Edwards and Darly’s, and others that we have mentioned, are

considered entirely out of date.

As far as Heppelwhite is concerned, neither the Chinese nor Gothic style

ever existed. The straight line is insisted upon, and he prefers to any

other the tapering and slender “term” leg ending in the “spade” foot.

(See full drawings on Plates LIV., LV., LVI., and LVII., and Nos. 2 and

3 on Plate LIV.) The legs are frequently inlaid with the husk, or

bell-flower, in satin-wood. His favourite ornamentations, whether

carved, inlaid, or painted and japanned, are the bell-flower in swags

and chutes, the lotus, the rosette, the acanthus, the shell, the urn

with and without drapery, and the three feathers of the Prince of

Wales’s crest. (See Plate LVI., Nos. 1, 3, 4, 6 and 8.) The brass-headed

nail is always used for fastening the material to the frames of his

seats. These are always placed close together, and are sometimes

arranged in the form of festoons, or scallops, around the seat. The

stripe is his favourite design for coverings. The festoon and the

ornamental tassel he greatly admires.

French and English furniture · 第 18 / 24 段