SIXTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 187, Art. 6]

Whether It Is Lawful for Religious to Wear Coarser Clothes Than

Others?

Objection 1: It would seem unlawful for religious to wear coarser

clothes than others. For according to the Apostle (1 Thess. 5:22) we

ought to "refrain from all appearance of evil." Now coarseness of

clothes has an appearance of evil; for our Lord said (Matt. 7:15):

"Beware of false prophets who come to you in the clothing of sheep":

and a gloss on Apoc. 6:8, "Behold a pale horse," says: "The devil

finding that he cannot succeed, neither by outward afflictions nor by

manifest heresies, sends in advance false brethren, who under the

guise of religion assume the characteristics of the black and red

horses by corrupting the faith." Therefore it would seem that

religious should not wear coarse clothes.

Obj. 2: Further, Jerome says (Ep. lii ad Nepotian.): "Avoid somber,"

i.e. black, "equally with glittering apparel. Fine and coarse clothes

are equally to be shunned, for the one exhales pleasure, the other

vainglory." Therefore, since vainglory is a graver sin than the use

of pleasure, it would seem that religious who should aim at what is

more perfect ought to avoid coarse rather than fine clothes.

Obj. 3: Further, religious should aim especially at doing works of

penance. Now in works of penance we should use, not outward signs of

sorrow, but rather signs of joy; for our Lord said (Matt. 6:16):

"When you fast, be not, as the hypocrites, sad," and afterwards He

added: "But thou, when thou fastest, anoint thy head and wash thy

face." Augustine commenting on these words (De Serm. Dom. in Monte

ii, 12): "In this chapter we must observe that not only the glare and

pomp of outward things, but even the weeds of mourning may be a

subject of ostentation, all the more dangerous as being a decoy under

the guise of God's service." Therefore seemingly religious ought not

to wear coarse clothes.

_On the contrary,_ The Apostle says (Heb. 11:37): "They wandered

about in sheep-skins, in goat-skins," and a gloss adds--"as Elias and

others." Moreover it is said in the Decretal XXI, qu. iv, can. Omnis

jactantia: "If any persons be found to deride those who wear coarse

and religious apparel they must be reproved. For in the early times

all those who were consecrated to God went about in common and coarse

apparel."

_I answer that,_ As Augustine says (De Doctr. Christ. iii, 12), "in

all external things, it is not the use but the intention of the user

that is at fault." In order to judge of this it is necessary to

observe that coarse and homely apparel may be considered in two ways.

First, as being a sign of a man's disposition or condition, because

according to Ecclus. 19:27, "the attire . . . of the man" shows "what

he is." In this way coarseness of attire is sometimes a sign of

sorrow: wherefore those who are beset with sorrow are wont to wear

coarser clothes, just as on the other hand in times of festivity and

joy they wear finer clothes. Hence penitents make use of coarse

apparel, for example, the king (Jonah 3:6) who "was clothed with

sack-cloth," and Achab (3 Kings 21:27) who "put hair-cloth upon his

flesh." Sometimes, however, it is a sign of the contempt of riches

and worldly ostentation. Wherefore Jerome says (Ep. cxxv ad Rustico

Monach.): "Let your somber attire indicate your purity of mind, your

coarse robe prove your contempt of the world, yet so that your mind

be not inflated withal, lest your speech belie your habit." In both

these ways it is becoming for religious to wear coarse attire, since

religion is a state of penance and of contempt of worldly glory.

But that a person wish to signify this to others arises from three

motives. First, in order to humble himself: for just as a man's mind

is uplifted by fine clothes, so is it humbled by lowly apparel. Hence

speaking of Achab who "put hair-cloth on his flesh," the Lord said to

Elias: "Hast thou not seen Achab humbled before Me?" (3 Kings 21:29).

Secondly, in order to set an example to others; wherefore a gloss on

Matt. 3:4, "(John) had his garments of camel's hair," says: "He who

preaches penance is clothed in the habit of penance." Thirdly, on

account of vainglory; thus Augustine says (cf. Obj. 3) that "even the

weeds of mourning may be a subject of ostentation."

Accordingly in the first two ways it is praiseworthy to wear humble

apparel, but in the third way it is sinful.

Secondly, coarse and homely attire may be considered as the result of

covetousness or negligence, and thus also it is sinful.

Reply Obj. 1: Coarseness of attire has not of itself the appearance

of evil, indeed it has more the appearance of good, namely of the

contempt of worldly glory. Hence it is that wicked persons hide their

wickedness under coarse clothing. Hence Augustine says (De Serm. Dom.

in Monte ii, 24) that "the sheep should not dislike their clothing

for the reason that the wolves sometimes hide themselves under it."

Reply Obj. 2: Jerome is speaking there of the coarse attire that is

worn on account of human glory.

Reply Obj. 3: According to our Lord's teaching men should do no deeds

of holiness for the sake of show: and this is especially the case

when one does something strange. Hence Chrysostom [*Hom. xiii in

Matth. in the Opus Imperfectum, falsely ascribed to St. John

Chrysostom] says: "While praying a man should do nothing strange, so

as to draw the gaze of others, either by shouting or striking his

breast, or casting up his hands," because the very strangeness draws

people's attention to him. Yet blame does not attach to all strange

behavior that draws people's attention, for it may be done well or

ill. Hence Augustine says (De Serm. Dom. in Monte ii, 12) that "in

the practice of the Christian religion when a man draws attention to

himself by unwonted squalor and shabbiness, since he acts thus

voluntarily and not of necessity, we can gather from his other deeds

whether his behavior is motivated by contempt of excessive dress or

by affectation." Religious, however, would especially seem not to act

thus from affectation, since they wear a coarse habit as a sign of

their profession whereby they profess contempt of the world.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 1108 / 1128 题