FIRST ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 175, Art. 1]

Whether the Soul of Man Is Carried Away to Things Divine?

Objection 1: It would seem that the soul of man is not carried away

to things divine. For some define rapture as "an uplifting by the

power of a higher nature, from that which is according to nature to

that which is above nature" [*Reference unknown; Cf. De Veritate

xiii, 1]. Now it is in accordance with man's nature that he be

uplifted to things divine; for Augustine says at the beginning of his

Confessions: "Thou madest us, Lord, for Thyself, and our heart is

restless, till it rest in Thee." Therefore man's soul is not carried

away to things divine.

Obj. 2: Further, Dionysius says (Div. Nom. viii) that "God's justice

is seen in this that He treats all things according to their mode and

dignity." But it is not in accordance with man's mode and worth that

he be raised above what he is according to nature. Therefore it would

seem that man's soul is not carried away to things divine.

Obj. 3: Further, rapture denotes violence of some kind. But God rules

us not by violence or force, as Damascene says [*De Fide Orth. ii,

30]. Therefore man's soul is not carried away to things divine.

_On the contrary,_ The Apostle says (2 Cor. 12:2): "I know a man in

Christ . . . rapt even to the third heaven." On which words a gloss

says: "Rapt, that is to say, uplifted contrary to nature."

_I answer that,_ Rapture denotes violence of a kind as stated above

(Obj. 3); and "the violent is that which has its principle without,

and in which he that suffers violence concurs not at all" (Ethic.

iii, 1). Now everything concurs in that to which it tends in

accordance with its proper inclination, whether voluntary or natural.

Wherefore he who is carried away by some external agent, must be

carried to something different from that to which his inclination

tends. This difference arises in two ways: in one way from the end of

the inclination--for instance a stone, which is naturally inclined to

be borne downwards, may be thrown upwards; in another way from the

manner of tending--for instance a stone may be thrown downwards with

greater velocity than consistent with its natural movement.

Accordingly man's soul also is said to be carried away, in a twofold

manner, to that which is contrary to its nature: in one way, as

regards the term of transport--as when it is carried away to

punishment, according to Ps. 49:22, "Lest He snatch you away, and

there be none to deliver you"; in another way, as regards the manner

connatural to man, which is that he should understand the truth

through sensible things. Hence when he is withdrawn from the

apprehension of sensibles, he is said to be carried away, even though

he be uplifted to things whereunto he is directed naturally: provided

this be not done intentionally, as when a man betakes himself to

sleep which is in accordance with nature, wherefore sleep cannot be

called rapture, properly speaking.

This withdrawal, whatever its term may be, may arise from a threefold

cause. First, from a bodily cause, as happens to those who suffer

abstraction from the senses through weakness: secondly, by the power

of the demons, as in those who are possessed: thirdly, by the power

of God. In this last sense we are now speaking of rapture, whereby a

man is uplifted by the spirit of God to things supernatural, and

withdrawn from his senses, according to Ezech. 8:3, "The spirit

lifted me up between the earth and the heaven, and brought me in the

vision of God into Jerusalem."

It must be observed, however, that sometimes a person is said to be

carried away, not only through being withdrawn from his senses, but

also through being withdrawn from the things to which he was

attending, as when a person's mind wanders contrary to his purpose.

But this is to use the expression in a less proper signification.

Reply Obj. 1: It is natural to man to tend to divine things through

the apprehension of things sensible, according to Rom. 1:20, "The

invisible things of God . . . are clearly seen, being understood by

the things that are made." But the mode, whereby a man is uplifted to

divine things and withdrawn from his senses, is not natural to man.

Reply Obj. 2: It belongs to man's mode and dignity that he be

uplifted to divine things, from the very fact that he is made to

God's image. And since a divine good infinitely surpasses the faculty

of man in order to attain that good, he needs the divine assistance

which is bestowed on him in every gift of grace. Hence it is not

contrary to nature, but above the faculty of nature that man's mind

be thus uplifted in rapture by God.

Reply Obj. 3: The saying of Damascene refers to those things which a

man does by himself. But as to those things which are beyond the

scope of the free-will, man needs to be uplifted by a stronger

operation, which in a certain respect may be called force if we

consider the mode of operation, but not if we consider its term to

which man is directed both by nature and by his intention.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 1032 / 1128 题