FIRST ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 170, Art. 1]

Whether the Precepts of Temperance Are Suitably Given in the Divine

Law?

Objection 1: It would seem that the precepts of temperance are

unsuitably given in the Divine law. Because fortitude is a greater

virtue than temperance, as stated above (Q. 123, A. 12; Q. 141, A. 8;

I-II, Q. 66, A. 4). Now there is no precept of fortitude among the

precepts of the decalogue, which are the most important among the

precepts of the Law. Therefore it was unfitting to include among the

precepts of the decalogue the prohibition of adultery, which is

contrary to temperance, as stated above (Q. 154, AA. 1, 8).

Obj. 2: Further, temperance is not only about venereal matters, but

also about pleasures of meat and drink. Now the precepts of the

decalogue include no prohibition of a vice pertaining to pleasures of

meat and drink, or to any other species of lust. Neither, therefore,

should they include a precept prohibiting adultery, which pertains to

venereal pleasure.

Obj. 3: Further, in the lawgiver's intention inducement to virtue

precedes the prohibition of vice, since vices are forbidden in order

that obstacles to virtue may be removed. Now the precepts of the

decalogue are the most important in the Divine law. Therefore the

precepts of the decalogue should have included an affirmative precept

directly prescribing the virtue of temperance, rather than a negative

precept forbidding adultery which is directly opposed thereto.

_On the contrary,_ stands the authority of Scripture in the decalogue

(Ex. 20:14, 17).

_I answer that,_ As the Apostle says (1 Tim. 1:5), "the end of the

commandment is charity," which is enjoined upon us in the two

precepts concerning the love of God and of our neighbor. Wherefore

the decalogue contains those precepts which tend more directly to the

love of God and of our neighbor. Now among the vices opposed to

temperance, adultery would seem most of all opposed to the love of

our neighbor, since thereby a man lays hold of another's property for

his own use, by abusing his neighbor's wife. Wherefore the precepts

of the decalogue include a special prohibition of adultery, not only

as committed in deed, but also as desired in thought.

Reply Obj. 1: Among the species of vices opposed to fortitude there

is not one that is so directly opposed to the love of our neighbor as

adultery, which is a species of lust that is opposed to temperance.

And yet the vice of daring, which is opposed to fortitude, is wont to

be sometimes the cause of murder, which is forbidden by one of the

precepts of the decalogue: for it is written (Ecclus. 8:18): "Go not

on the way with a bold man lest he burden thee with his evils."

Reply Obj. 2: Gluttony is not directly opposed to the love of our

neighbor, as adultery is. Nor indeed is any other species of lust,

for a father is not so wronged by the seduction of the virgin over

whom he has no connubial right, as is the husband by the adultery of

his wife, for he, not the wife herself, has power over her body [*1

Cor. 7:4].

Reply Obj. 3: As stated above (Q. 122, AA. 1, 4) the precepts of the

decalogue are universal principles of the Divine law; hence they need

to be common precepts. Now it was not possible to give any common

affirmative precepts of temperance, because the practice of

temperance varies according to different times, as Augustine remarks

(De Bono Conjug. xv, 7), and according to different human laws and

customs.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 1002 / 1128 题