SIXTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 162, Art. 6]

Whether Pride Is the Most Grievous of Sins?

Objection 1: It would seem that pride is not the most grievous of

sins. For the more difficult a sin is to avoid, the less grievous it

would seem to be. Now pride is most difficult to avoid; for Augustine

says in his Rule (Ep. ccxi), "Other sins find their vent in the

accomplishment of evil deeds, whereas pride lies in wait for good

deeds to destroy them." Therefore pride is not the most grievous of

sins.

Obj. 2: Further, "The greater evil is opposed to the greater good,"

as the Philosopher asserts (Ethic. viii, 10). Now humility to which

pride is opposed is not the greatest of virtues, as stated above (Q.

61, A. 5). Therefore the vices that are opposed to greater virtues,

such as unbelief, despair, hatred of God, murder, and so forth, are

more grievous sins than pride.

Obj. 3: Further, the greater evil is not punished by a lesser evil.

But pride is sometimes punished by other sins according to Rom. 1:28,

where it is stated that on account of their pride of heart, men of

science were delivered "to a reprobate sense, to do those things

which are not convenient." Therefore pride is not the most grievous

of sins.

_On the contrary,_ A gloss on Ps. 118:51, "The proud did

iniquitously," says: "The greatest sin in man is pride."

_I answer that,_ Two things are to be observed in sin, conversion to

a mutable good, and this is the material part of sin; and aversion

from the immutable good, and this gives sin its formal aspect and

complement. Now on the part of the conversion, there is no reason for

pride being the greatest of sins, because uplifting which pride

covets inordinately, is not essentially most incompatible with the

good of virtue. But on the part of the aversion, pride has extreme

gravity, because in other sins man turns away from God, either

through ignorance or through weakness, or through desire for any

other good whatever; whereas pride denotes aversion from God simply

through being unwilling to be subject to God and His rule. Hence

Boethius [*Cf. Cassian, de Caenob. Inst. xii, 7] says that "while all

vices flee from God, pride alone withstands God"; for which reason it

is specially stated (James 4:6) that "God resisteth the proud."

Wherefore aversion from God and His commandments, which is a

consequence as it were in other sins, belongs to pride by its very

nature, for its act is the contempt of God. And since that which

belongs to a thing by its nature is always of greater weight than

that which belongs to it through something else, it follows that

pride is the most grievous of sins by its genus, because it exceeds

in aversion which is the formal complement of sin.

Reply Obj. 1: A sin is difficult to avoid in two ways. First, on

account of the violence of its onslaught; thus anger is violent in

its onslaught on account of its impetuosity; and "still more

difficult is it to resist concupiscence, on account of its

connaturality," as stated in _Ethic._ ii, 3, 9. A difficulty of this

kind in avoiding sin diminishes the gravity of the sin; because a man

sins the more grievously, according as he yields to a less impetuous

temptation, as Augustine says (De Civ. Dei xiv, 12, 15).

Secondly, it is difficult to avoid a sin, on account of its being

hidden. In this way it is difficult to avoid pride, since it takes

occasion even from good deeds, as stated (A. 5, ad 3). Hence

Augustine says pointedly that it "lies in wait for good deeds"; and

it is written (Ps. 141:4): "In the way wherein I walked, the proud

[*Cf. Ps. 139:6, 'The proud have hidden a net for me.'] [Vulg.:

'they'] have hidden a snare for me." Hence no very great gravity

attaches to the movement of pride while creeping in secretly, and

before it is discovered by the judgment of reason: but once

discovered by reason, it is easily avoided, both by considering one's

own infirmity, according to Ecclus. 10:9, "Why is earth and ashes

proud?" and by considering God's greatness, according to Job 15:13,

"Why doth thy spirit swell against God?" as well as by considering

the imperfection of the goods on which man prides himself, according

to Isa. 40:6, "All flesh is grass, and all the glory thereof as the

flower of the field"; and farther on (Isa. 64:6), "all our justices"

are become "like the rag of a menstruous woman."

Reply Obj. 2: Opposition between a vice and a virtue is inferred from

the object, which is considered on the part of conversion. In this

way pride has no claim to be the greatest of sins, as neither has

humility to be the greatest of virtues. But it is the greatest on the

part of aversion, since it brings greatness upon other sins. For

unbelief, by the very fact of its arising out of proud contempt, is

rendered more grievous than if it be the outcome of ignorance or

weakness. The same applies to despair and the like.

Reply Obj. 3: Just as in syllogisms that lead to an impossible

conclusion one is sometimes convinced by being faced with a more

evident absurdity, so too, in order to overcome their pride, God

punishes certain men by allowing them to fall into sins of the flesh,

which though they be less grievous are more evidently shameful. Hence

Isidore says (De Summo Bono ii, 38) that "pride is the worst of all

vices; whether because it is appropriate to those who are of highest

and foremost rank, or because it originates from just and virtuous

deeds, so that its guilt is less perceptible. On the other hand,

carnal lust is apparent to all, because from the outset it is of a

shameful nature: and yet, under God's dispensation, it is less

grievous than pride. For he who is in the clutches of pride and feels

it not, falls into the lusts of the flesh, that being thus humbled he

may rise from his abasement."

From this indeed the gravity of pride is made manifest. For just as a

wise physician, in order to cure a worse disease, allows the patient

to contract one that is less dangerous, so the sin of pride is shown

to be more grievous by the very fact that, as a remedy, God allows

men to fall into other sins.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 973 / 1128 题