FIFTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 162, Art. 5]

Whether Pride Is a Mortal Sin?

Objection 1: It would seem that pride is not a mortal sin. For a

gloss on Ps. 7:4, "O Lord my God, if I have done this thing," says:

"Namely, the universal sin which is pride." Therefore if pride were a

mortal sin, so would every sin be.

Obj. 2: Further, every mortal sin is contrary to charity. But pride

is apparently not contrary to charity, neither as to the love of God,

nor as to the love of one's neighbor, because the excellence which,

by pride, one desires inordinately, is not always opposed to God's

honor, or our neighbor's good. Therefore pride is not a mortal sin.

Obj. 3: Further, every mortal sin is opposed to virtue. But pride is

not opposed to virtue; on the contrary, it arises therefrom, for as

Gregory says (Moral. xxxiv, 23), "sometimes a man is elated by

sublime and heavenly virtues." Therefore pride is not a mortal sin.

_On the contrary,_ Gregory says (Moral. xxxiv, 23) that "pride is a

most evident sign of the reprobate, and contrariwise, humility of the

elect." But men do not become reprobate on account of venial sins.

Therefore pride is not a venial but a mortal sin.

_I answer that,_ Pride is opposed to humility. Now humility properly

regards the subjection of man to God, as stated above (Q. 161, A. 1,

ad 5). Hence pride properly regards lack of this subjection, in so

far as a man raises himself above that which is appointed to him

according to the Divine rule or measure, against the saying of the

Apostle (2 Cor. 10:13), "But we will not glory beyond our measure;

but according to the measure of the rule which God hath measured to

us." Wherefore it is written (Ecclus. 10:14): "The beginning of the

pride of man is to fall off from God" because, to wit, the root of

pride is found to consist in man not being, in some way, subject to

God and His rule. Now it is evident that not to be subject to God is

of its very nature a mortal sin, for this consists in turning away

from God: and consequently pride is, of its genus, a mortal sin.

Nevertheless just as in other sins which are mortal by their genus

(for instance fornication and adultery) there are certain motions

that are venial by reason of their imperfection (through forestalling

the judgment of reason, and being without its consent), so too in the

matter of pride it happens that certain motions of pride are venial

sins, when reason does not consent to them.

Reply Obj. 1: As stated above (A. 2) pride is a general sin, not by

its essence but by a kind of influence, in so far as all sins may

have their origin in pride. Hence it does not follow that all sins

are mortal, but only such as arise from perfect pride, which we have

stated to be a mortal sin.

Reply Obj. 2: Pride is always contrary to the love of God, inasmuch

as the proud man does not subject himself to the Divine rule as he

ought. Sometimes it is also contrary to the love of our neighbor;

when, namely, a man sets himself inordinately above his neighbor: and

this again is a transgression of the Divine rule, which has

established order among men, so that one ought to be subject to

another.

Reply Obj. 3: Pride arises from virtue, not as from its direct

cause, but as from an accidental cause, in so far as a man makes a

virtue an occasion for pride. And nothing prevents one contrary from

being the accidental cause of another, as stated in _Phys._ viii, 1.

Hence some are even proud of their humility.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 972 / 1128 题