FOURTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 151, Art. 4]

Whether Purity Belongs Especially to Chastity?

Objection 1: It would seem that purity does not belong especially to

chastity. For Augustine says (De Civ. Dei i, 18) that "purity is a

virtue of the soul." Therefore it is not something belonging to

chastity, but is of itself a virtue distinct from chastity.

Obj. 2: Further, _pudicitia_ (purity) is derived from _pudor,_ which

is equivalent to shame. Now shame, according to Damascene [*De Fide

Orth. ii, 15], is about a disgraceful act, and this is common to all

sinful acts. Therefore purity belongs no more to chastity than to the

other virtues.

Obj. 3: Further, the Philosopher says (Ethic. iii, 12) that "every

kind of intemperance is most deserving of reproach." Now it would

seem to belong to purity to avoid all that is deserving of reproach.

Therefore purity belongs to all the parts of temperance, and not

especially to chastity.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says (De Perseverantia xx): "We must

give praise to purity, that he who has ears to hear, may put to none

but a lawful use the organs intended for procreation." Now the use of

these organs is the proper matter of chastity. Therefore purity

belongs properly to chastity.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (Obj. 2), _pudicitia_ (purity) takes

its name from _pudor,_ which signifies shame. Hence purity must needs

be properly about the things of which man is most ashamed. Now men

are most ashamed of venereal acts, as Augustine remarks (De Civ. Dei

xiv, 18), so much so that even the conjugal act, which is adorned by

the honesty [*Cf. Q. 145] of marriage, is not devoid of shame: and

this because the movement of the organs of generation is not subject

to the command of reason, as are the movements of the other external

members. Now man is ashamed not only of this sexual union but also of

all the signs thereof, as the Philosopher observes (Rhet. ii, 6).

Consequently purity regards venereal matters properly, and especially

the signs thereof, such as impure looks, kisses, and touches. And

since the latter are more wont to be observed, purity regards rather

these external signs, while chastity regards rather sexual union.

Therefore purity is directed to chastity, not as a virtue distinct

therefrom, but as expressing a circumstance of chastity. Nevertheless

the one is sometimes used to designate the other.

Reply Obj. 1: Augustine is here speaking of purity as designating

chastity.

Reply Obj. 2: Although every vice has a certain disgrace, the vices

of intemperance are especially disgraceful, as stated above (Q. 142,

A. 4).

Reply Obj. 3: Among the vices of intemperance, venereal sins are most

deserving of reproach, both on account of the insubordination of the

genital organs, and because by these sins especially, the reason is

absorbed.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 904 / 1128 题