EIGHTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 141, Art. 8]

Whether Temperance Is the Greatest of the Virtues?

Objection 1: It would seem that temperance is the greatest of the

virtues. For Ambrose says (De Offic. i, 43) that "what we observe and

seek most in temperance is the safeguarding of what is honorable, and

the regard for what is beautiful." Now virtue deserves praise for

being honorable and beautiful. Therefore temperance is the greatest

of the virtues.

Obj. 2: Further, the more difficult the deed the greater the virtue.

Now it is more difficult to control desires and pleasures of touch

than to regulate external actions, the former pertaining to

temperance and the latter to justice. Therefore temperance is a

greater virtue than justice.

Obj. 3: Further, seemingly the more general a thing is, the more

necessary and the better it is. Now fortitude is about dangers of

death which occur less frequently than pleasures of touch, for these

occur every day; so that temperance is in more general use than

fortitude. Therefore temperance is a more excellent virtue than

fortitude.

_On the contrary,_ The Philosopher says (Rhet. i, 9) that the

"greatest virtues are those which are most profitable to others, for

which reason we give the greatest honor to the brave and the just."

_I answer that,_ As the Philosopher declares (Ethic. i, 2) "the good

of the many is more of the godlike than the good of the individual,"

wherefore the more a virtue regards the good of the many, the better

it is. Now justice and fortitude regard the good of the many more

than temperance does, since justice regards the relations between one

man and another, while fortitude regards dangers of battle which are

endured for the common weal: whereas temperance moderates only the

desires and pleasures which affect man himself. Hence it is evident

that justice and fortitude are more excellent virtues than

temperance: while prudence and the theological virtues are more

excellent still.

Reply Obj. 1: Honor and beauty are especially ascribed to temperance,

not on account of the excellence of the good proper to temperance,

but on account of the disgrace of the contrary evil from which it

withdraws us, by moderating the pleasures common to us and the lower

animals.

Reply Obj. 2: Since virtue is about the difficult and the good, the

excellence of a virtue is considered more under the aspect of good,

wherein justice excels, than under the aspect of difficult, wherein

temperance excels.

Reply Obj. 3: That which is general because it regards the many

conduces more to the excellence of goodness than that which is

general because it occurs frequently: fortitude excels in the former

way, temperance in the latter. Hence fortitude is greater simply,

although in some respects temperance may be described as greater not

only than fortitude but also than justice.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 852 / 1128 题