FIRST ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 125, Art. 1]

Whether Fear Is a Sin?

Objection 1: It seems that fear is not a sin. For fear is a passion,

as stated above (I-II, Q. 23, A. 4; Q. 42). Now we are neither

praised nor blamed for passions, as stated in _Ethic._ ii. Since then

every sin is blameworthy, it seems that fear is not a sin.

Obj. 2: Further, nothing that is commanded in the Divine Law is a

sin: since the "law of the Lord is unspotted" (Ps. 18:8). Yet fear is

commanded in God's law, for it is written (Eph. 6:5): "Servants, be

obedient to them that are your lords according to the flesh, with

fear and trembling." Therefore fear is not a sin.

Obj. 3: Further, nothing that is naturally in man is a sin, for sin

is contrary to nature according to Damascene (De Fide Orth. iii). Now

fear is natural to man: wherefore the Philosopher says (Ethic. iii,

7) that "a man would be insane or insensible to pain, if nothing, not

even earthquakes nor deluges, inspired him with fear." Therefore fear

is not a sin.

_On the contrary,_ our Lord said (Matt. 10:28): "Fear ye not them

that kill the body," and it is written (Ezech. 2:6): "Fear not,

neither be thou afraid of their words."

_I answer that,_ A human act is said to be a sin on account of its

being inordinate, because the good of a human act consists in order,

as stated above (Q. 109, A. 2; Q. 114, A. 1). Now this due order

requires that the appetite be subject to the ruling of reason. And

reason dictates that certain things should be shunned and some sought

after. Among things to be shunned, it dictates that some are to be

shunned more than others; and among things to be sought after, that

some are to be sought after more than others. Moreover, the more a

good is to be sought after, the more is the opposite evil to be

shunned. The result is that reason dictates that certain goods are to

be sought after more than certain evils are to be avoided.

Accordingly when the appetite shuns what the reason dictates that we

should endure rather than forfeit others that we should rather seek

for, fear is inordinate and sinful. On the other hand, when the

appetite fears so as to shun what reason requires to be shunned, the

appetite is neither inordinate nor sinful.

Reply Obj. 1: Fear in its generic acceptation denotes avoidance in

general. Hence in this way it does not include the notion of good or

evil: and the same applies to every other passion. Wherefore the

Philosopher says that passions call for neither praise nor blame,

because, to wit, we neither praise nor blame those who are angry or

afraid, but only those who behave thus in an ordinate or inordinate

manner.

Reply Obj. 2: The fear which the Apostle inculcates is in accordance

with reason, namely that servants should fear lest they be lacking in

the service they owe their masters.

Reply Obj. 3: Reason dictates that we should shun the evils that we

cannot withstand, and the endurance of which profits us nothing.

Hence there is no sin in fearing them.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 779 / 1128 题