SECOND ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 117, Art. 2]

Whether Liberality Is About Money?

Objection 1: It seems that liberality is not about money. For every

moral virtue is about operations and passions. Now it is proper to

justice to be about operations, as stated in _Ethic._ v, 1.

Therefore, since liberality is a moral virtue, it seems that it is

about passions and not about money.

Obj. 2: Further, it belongs to a liberal man to make use of any kind

of wealth. Now natural riches are more real than artificial riches,

according to the Philosopher (Polit. i, 5, 6). Therefore liberality

is not chiefly about money.

Obj. 3: Further, different virtues have different matter, since

habits are distinguished by their objects. But external things are

the matter of distributive and commutative justice. Therefore they

are not the matter of liberality.

_On the contrary,_ The Philosopher says (Ethic. iv, 1) that

"liberality seems to be a mean in the matter of money."

_I answer that,_ According to the Philosopher (Ethic. iv, 1) it

belongs to the liberal man to part with things. Hence liberality is

also called open-handedness (_largitas_), because that which is open

does not withhold things but parts with them. The term "liberality"

seems also to allude to this, since when a man quits hold of a thing

he frees it (_liberat_), so to speak, from his keeping and ownership,

and shows his mind to be free of attachment thereto. Now those things

which are the subject of a man's free-handedness towards others are

the goods he possesses, which are denoted by the term "money."

Therefore the proper matter of liberality is money.

Reply Obj. 1: As stated above (A. 1, ad 3), liberality depends not on

the quantity given, but on the heart of the giver. Now the heart of

the giver is disposed according to the passions of love and desire,

and consequently those of pleasure and sorrow, towards the things

given. Hence the interior passions are the immediate matter of

liberality, while exterior money is the object of those same passions.

Reply Obj. 2: As Augustine says in his book _De Disciplina Christi_

(Tract. de divers, i), everything whatsoever man has on earth, and

whatsoever he owns, goes by the name of _pecunia_ (money), because

in olden times men's possessions consisted entirely of _pecora_

(flocks). And the Philosopher says (Ethic. iv, 1): "We give the name

of money to anything that can be valued in currency."

Reply Obj. 3: Justice establishes equality in external things, but

has nothing to do, properly speaking, with the regulation of internal

passions: wherefore money is in one way the matter of liberality, and

in another way of justice.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 728 / 1128 题