SECOND ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 113, Art. 2]

Whether Irony Is a Less Grievous Sin Than Boasting?

Objection 1: It seems that irony is not a less grievous sin than

boasting. For each of them is a sin through forsaking truth, which is

a kind of equality. But one does not forsake truth by exceeding it

any more than by diminishing it. Therefore irony is not a less

grievous sin than boasting.

Obj. 2: Further, according to the Philosopher (Ethic. iv, 7), irony

sometimes is boasting. But boasting is not irony. Therefore irony is

not a less grievous sin than boasting.

Obj. 3: Further, it is written (Prov. 26:25): "When he shall speak

low, trust him not: because there are seven mischiefs in his heart."

Now it belongs to irony to speak low. Therefore it contains a

manifold wickedness.

_On the contrary,_ The Philosopher says (Ethic. iv, 7): "Those who

speak with irony and belittle themselves are more gracious,

seemingly, in their manners."

_I answer that,_ As stated above (Q. 110, AA. 2, 4), one lie is more

grievous than another, sometimes on account of the matter which it is

about--thus a lie about a matter of religious doctrine is most

grievous--and sometimes on account of the motive for sinning; thus a

mischievous lie is more grievous than an officious or jocose lie. Now

irony and boasting lie about the same matter, either by words, or by

any other outward signs, namely, about matters affecting the person:

so that in this respect they are equal.

But for the most part boasting proceeds from a viler motive, namely,

the desire of gain or honor: whereas irony arises from a man's

averseness, albeit inordinate, to be disagreeable to others by

uplifting himself: and in this respect the Philosopher says (Ethic.

iv, 7) that "boasting is a more grievous sin than irony."

Sometimes, however, it happens that a man belittles himself for some

other motive, for instance that he may deceive cunningly: and then

irony is more grievous.

Reply Obj. 1: This argument applies to irony and boasting, according

as a lie is considered to be grievous in itself or on account of its

matter: for it has been said that in this way they are equal.

Reply Obj. 2: Excellence is twofold: one is in temporal, the other in

spiritual things. Now it happens at times that a person, by outward

words or signs, pretends to be lacking in external things, for

instance by wearing shabby clothes, or by doing something of the

kind, and that he intends by so doing to make a show of some

spiritual excellence. Thus our Lord said of certain men (Matt. 6:16)

that "they disfigure their faces that they may appear unto men to

fast." Wherefore such persons are guilty of both vices, irony and

boasting, although in different respects, and for this reason they

sin more grievously. Hence the Philosopher says (Ethic. iv, 7) that

it is "the practice of boasters both to make overmuch of themselves,

and to make very little of themselves": and for the same reason it is

related of Augustine that he was unwilling to possess clothes that

were either too costly or too shabby, because by both do men seek

glory.

Reply Obj. 3: According to the words of Ecclus. 19:23, "There is one

that humbleth himself wickedly, and his interior is full of deceit,"

and it is in this sense that Solomon speaks of the man who, through

deceitful humility, "speaks low" wickedly.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 716 / 1128 题