FIRST ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 113, Art. 1]

Whether Irony Is a Sin?

Objection 1: It seems that irony, which consists in belittling

oneself, is not a sin. For no sin arises from one's being

strengthened by God: and yet this leads one to belittle oneself,

according to Prov. 30:1, 2: "The vision which the man spoke, with

whom is God, and who being strengthened by God, abiding with him,

said, I am the most foolish of men." Also it is written (Amos 7:14):

"Amos answered . . . I am not a prophet." Therefore irony, whereby a

man belittles himself in words, is not a sin.

Obj. 2: Further, Gregory says in a letter to Augustine, bishop of the

English (Regist. xii): "It is the mark of a well-disposed mind to

acknowledge one's fault when one is not guilty." But all sin is

inconsistent with a well-disposed mind. Therefore irony is not a sin.

Obj. 3: Further, it is not a sin to shun pride. But "some belittle

themselves in words, so as to avoid pride," according to the

Philosopher (Ethic. iv, 7). Therefore irony is not a sin.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says (De Verb. Apost., Serm. xxix): "If

thou liest on account of humility, if thou wert not a sinner before

lying, thou hast become one by lying."

_I answer that,_ To speak so as to belittle oneself may occur in two

ways. First so as to safeguard truth, as when a man conceals the

greater things in himself, but discovers and asserts lesser things of

himself the presence of which in himself he perceives. To belittle

oneself in this way does not belong to irony, nor is it a sin in

respect of its genus, except through corruption of one of its

circumstances. Secondly, a person belittles himself by forsaking the

truth, for instance by ascribing to himself something mean the

existence of which in himself he does not perceive, or by denying

something great of himself, which nevertheless he perceives himself

to possess: this pertains to irony, and is always a sin.

Reply Obj. 1: There is a twofold wisdom and a twofold folly. For

there is a wisdom according to God, which has human or worldly folly

annexed to it, according to 1 Cor. 3:18, "If any man among you seem

to be wise in this world, let him become a fool that he may be wise."

But there is another wisdom that is worldly, which as the same text

goes on to say, "is foolishness with God." Accordingly, he that is

strengthened by God acknowledges himself to be most foolish in the

estimation of men, because, to wit, he despises human things, which

human wisdom seeks. Hence the text quoted continues, "and the wisdom

of men is not with me," and farther on, "and I have known the science

of the saints" [*Vulg.: 'and I have not known the science of the

saints'].

It may also be replied that "the wisdom of men" is that which is

acquired by human reason, while the "wisdom of the saints" is that

which is received by divine inspiration.

Amos denied that he was a prophet by birth, since, to wit, he was not

of the race of prophets: hence the text goes on, "nor am I the son of

a prophet."

Reply Obj. 2: It belongs to a well-disposed mind that a man tend to

perfect righteousness, and consequently deem himself guilty, not only

if he fall short of common righteousness, which is truly a sin, but

also if he fall short of perfect righteousness, which sometimes is

not a sin. But he does not call sinful that which he does not

acknowledge to be sinful: which would be a lie of irony.

Reply Obj. 3: A man should not commit one sin in order to avoid

another: and so he ought not to lie in any way at all in order to

avoid pride. Hence Augustine says (Tract. xliii in Joan.): "Shun not

arrogance so as to forsake truth": and Gregory says (Moral. xxvi, 3)

that "it is a reckless humility that entangles itself with lies."

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 715 / 1128 题