FOURTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 106, Art. 4]

Whether a Man Is Bound to Repay a Favor at Once?

Objection 1: It seems that a man is bound to repay a favor at once.

For we are bound to restore at once what we owe, unless the term be

fixed. Now there is no term prescribed for the repayment of favors,

and yet this repayment is a duty, as stated above (A. 3). Therefore a

man is bound to repay a favor at once.

Obj. 2: Further, a good action would seem to be all the more

praiseworthy according as it is done with greater earnestness. Now

earnestness seems to make a man do his duty without any delay.

Therefore it is apparently more praiseworthy to repay a favor at once.

Obj. 3: Further, Seneca says (De Benef. ii) that "it is proper to a

benefactor to act freely and quickly." Now repayment ought to equal

the favor received. Therefore it should be done at once.

_On the contrary,_ Seneca says (De Benef. iv): "He that hastens to

repay, is animated with a sense, not of gratitude but of

indebtedness."

_I answer that,_ Just as in conferring a favor two things are to be

considered, namely, the affection of the heart and the gift, so also

must these things be considered in repaying the favor. As regards the

affection of the heart, repayment should be made at once, wherefore

Seneca says (De Benef. ii): "Do you wish to repay a favor? Receive it

graciously." As regards the gift, one ought to wait until such a time

as will be convenient to the benefactor. In fact, if instead of

choosing a convenient time, one wished to repay at once, favor for

favor, it would not seem to be a virtuous, but a constrained

repayment. For, as Seneca observes (De Benef. iv), "he that wishes to

repay too soon, is an unwilling debtor, and an unwilling debtor is

ungrateful."

Reply Obj. 1: A legal debt must be paid at once, else the equality of

justice would not be preserved, if one kept another's property

without his consent. But a moral debt depends on the equity of the

debtor: and therefore it should be repaid in due time according as

the rectitude of virtue demands.

Reply Obj. 2: Earnestness of the will is not virtuous unless it be

regulated by reason; wherefore it is not praiseworthy to forestall

the proper time through earnestness.

Reply Obj. 3: Favors also should be conferred at a convenient time

and one should no longer delay when the convenient time comes; and

the same is to be observed in repaying favors.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 683 / 1128 题