SECOND ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 86, Art. 2]

Whether Oblations Are Due to Priests Alone?

Objection 1: It would seem that oblations are not due to priests

alone. For chief among oblations would seem to be those that are

deputed to the sacrifices of victims. Now whatever is given to the

poor is called a "victim" in Scripture according to Heb. 13:16, "Do

not forget to do good and to impart, for by such victims [Douay:

'sacrifices'] God's favor is obtained." Much more therefore are

oblations due to the poor.

Obj. 2: Further, in many parishes monks have a share in the

oblations. Now "the case of clerics is distinct from the case of

monks," as Jerome states [*Ep. xiv, ad Heliod.]. Therefore oblations

art not due to priests alone.

Obj. 3: Further, lay people with the consent of the Church buy

oblations such as loaves and so forth, and they do so for no other

reason than that they may make use thereof themselves. Therefore

oblations may have reference to the laity.

_On the contrary,_ A canon of Pope Damasus [*Damasus I] quoted X, qu.

i [*Can. Hanc consuetudinem], says: "None but the priests whom day by

day we see serving the Lord may eat and drink of the oblations which

are offered within the precincts of the Holy Church: because in the

Old Testament the Lord forbade the children of Israel to eat the

sacred loaves, with the exception of Aaron and his sons" (Lev. 24:8,

9).

_I answer that,_ The priest is appointed mediator and stands, so to

speak, _between_ the people and God, as we read of Moses (Deut. 5:5),

wherefore it belongs to him to set forth the Divine teachings and

sacraments before the people; and besides to offer to the Lord things

appertaining to the people, their prayers, for instance, their

sacrifices and oblations. Thus the Apostle says (Heb. 5:1): "Every

high priest taken from among men is ordained for men in the things

that appertain to God, that he may offer up gifts and sacrifices for

sins." Hence the oblations which the people offer to God concern the

priests, not only as regards their turning them to their own use, but

also as regards the faithful dispensation thereof, by spending them

partly on things appertaining to the Divine worship, partly on things

touching their own livelihood (since they that serve the altar

partake with the altar, according to 1 Cor. 9:13), and partly for the

good of the poor, who, as far as possible, should be supported from

the possessions of the Church: for our Lord had a purse for the use

of the poor, as Jerome observes on Matt. 17:26, "That we may not

scandalize them."

Reply Obj. 1: Whatever is given to the poor is not a sacrifice

properly speaking; yet it is called a sacrifice in so far as it is

given to them for God's sake. In like manner, and for the same

reason, it can be called an oblation, though not properly speaking,

since it is not given immediately to God. Oblations properly so

called fall to the use of the poor, not by the dispensation of the

offerers, but by the dispensation of the priests.

Reply Obj. 2: Monks or other religious may receive oblations under

three counts. First, as poor, either by the dispensation of the

priests, or by ordination of the Church; secondly, through being

ministers of the altar, and then they can accept oblations that are

freely offered; thirdly, if the parishes belong to them, and they can

accept oblations, having a right to them as rectors of the Church.

Reply Obj. 3: Oblations when once they are consecrated, such

as sacred vessels and vestments, cannot be granted to the use of the

laity: and this is the meaning of the words of Pope Damasus. But those

which are unconsecrated may be allowed to the use of layfolk by

permission of the priests, whether by way of gift or by way of sale.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 567 / 1128 题