FIRST ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 86, Art. 1]

Whether Men Are Under a Necessity of Precept to Make Oblations?

Objection 1: It would seem that men are not bound by precept to make

oblations. Men are not bound, at the time of the Gospel, to observe

the ceremonial precepts of the Old Law, as stated above (I-II, Q.

103, AA. 3, 4). Now the offering of oblations is one of the

ceremonial precepts of the Old Law, since it is written (Ex. 23:14):

"Three times every year you shall celebrate feasts with Me," and

further on (Ex. 23:15): "Thou shalt not appear empty before Me."

Therefore men are not now under a necessity of precept to make

oblations.

Obj. 2: Further, before they are made, oblations depend on man's

will, as appears from our Lord's saying (Matt. 5:23), "If . . . thou

offer thy gift at the altar," as though this were left to the choice

of the offerer: and when once oblations have been made, there is no

way of offering them again. Therefore in no way is a man under a

necessity of precept to make oblations.

Obj. 3: Further, if anyone is bound to give a certain thing to the

Church, and fails to give it, he can be compelled to do so by being

deprived of the Church's sacraments. But it would seem unlawful to

refuse the sacraments of the Church to those who refuse to make

oblations according to a decree of the sixth council [*Can. Trullan,

xxiii, quoted I, qu. i, can. Nullus]: "Let none who dispense Holy

Communion exact anything of the recipient, and if they exact anything

let them be deposed." Therefore it is not necessary that men should

make oblations.

_On the contrary,_ Gregory says [*Gregory VII; Concil. Roman. v, can.

xii]: "Let every Christian take care that he offer something to God

at the celebration of Mass."

_I answer that,_ As stated above (Q. 85, A. 3, ad 3), the term

"oblation" is common to all things offered for the Divine worship, so

that if a thing be offered to be destroyed in worship of God, as

though it were being made into something holy, it is both an oblation

and a sacrifice. Wherefore it is written (Ex. 29:18): "Thou shalt

offer the whole ram for a burnt-offering upon the altar; it is an

oblation to the Lord, a most sweet savor of the victim of the Lord";

and (Lev. 2:1): "When anyone shall offer an oblation of sacrifice to

the Lord, his offering shall be of fine flour." If, on the other

hand, it be offered with a view to its remaining entire and being

deputed to the worship of God or to the use of His ministers, it will

be an oblation and not a sacrifice. Accordingly it is essential to

oblations of this kind that they be offered voluntarily, according to

Ex. 25:2, of "every man that offereth of his own accord you shall

take them." Nevertheless it may happen in four ways that one is bound

to make oblations. First, on account of a previous agreement: as when

a person is granted a portion of Church land, that he may make

certain oblations at fixed times, although this has the character of

rent. Secondly, by reason of a previous assignment or promise; as

when a man offers a gift among the living, or by will bequeaths to

the Church something whether movable or immovable to be delivered at

some future time. Thirdly, on account of the need of the Church, for

instance if her ministers were without means of support. Fourthly, on

account of custom; for the faithful are bound at certain solemn

feasts to make certain customary oblations. In the last two cases,

however, the oblation remains voluntary, as regards, to wit, the

quantity or kind of the thing offered.

Reply Obj. 1: Under the New Law men are not bound to make oblations

on account of legal solemnities, as stated in Exodus, but on account

of certain other reasons, as stated above.

Reply Obj. 2: Some are bound to make oblations, both before making

them, as in the first, third, and fourth cases, and after they have

made them by assignment or promise: for they are bound to offer in

reality that which has been already offered to the Church by way of

assignment.

Reply Obj. 3: Those who do not make the oblations they are

bound to make may be punished by being deprived of the sacraments, not

by the priest himself to whom the oblations should be made, lest he

seem to exact, something for bestowing the sacraments, but by someone

superior to him.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 566 / 1128 题