FOURTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 72, Art. 4]

Whether Reviling Arises from Anger?

Objection 1: It would seem that reviling does not arise from anger.

For it is written (Prov. 11:2): "Where pride is, there shall also be

reviling [Douay: 'reproach']." But anger is a vice distinct from

pride. Therefore reviling does not arise from anger.

Obj. 2: Further, it is written (Prov. 20:3): "All fools are meddling

with revilings [Douay: 'reproaches']." Now folly is a vice opposed to

wisdom, as stated above (Q. 46, A. 1); whereas anger is opposed to

meekness. Therefore reviling does not arise from anger.

Obj. 3: Further, no sin is diminished by its cause. But the sin of

reviling is diminished if one gives vent to it through anger: for it

is a more grievous sin to revile out of hatred than out of anger.

Therefore reviling does not arise from anger.

_On the contrary,_ Gregory says (Moral. xxxi, 45) that "anger gives

rise to revilings."

_I answer that,_ While one sin may arise from various causes, it is

nevertheless said to have its source chiefly in that one from which

it is wont to arise most frequently, through being closely connected

with its end. Now reviling is closely connected with anger's end,

which is revenge: since the easiest way for the angry man to take

revenge on another is to revile him. Therefore reviling arises

chiefly from anger.

Reply Obj. 1: Reviling is not directed to the end of pride which is

excellency. Hence reviling does not arise directly from pride.

Nevertheless pride disposes a man to revile, in so far as those who

think themselves to excel, are more prone to despise others and

inflict injuries on them, because they are more easily angered,

through deeming it an affront to themselves whenever anything is done

against their will.

Reply Obj. 2: According to the Philosopher (Ethic. vii, 6)

"anger listens imperfectly to reason": wherefore an angry man suffers

a defect of reason, and in this he is like the foolish man. Hence

reviling arises from folly on account of the latter's kinship with

anger.

Reply Obj. 3: According to the Philosopher (Rhet. ii, 4) "an

angry man seeks an open offense, but he who hates does not worry about

this." Hence reviling which denotes a manifest injury belongs to anger

rather than to hatred.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 488 / 1128 题