SECOND ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 72, Art. 2]

Whether Reviling or Railing Is a Mortal Sin?

Objection 1: It would seem that reviling or railing is not a mortal

sin. For no mortal sin is an act of virtue. Now railing is the act of

a virtue, viz. of wittiness (_eutrapelia_) [*Cf. I-II, Q. 60, A. 5]

to which it pertains to rail well, according to the Philosopher

(Ethic. iv, 8). Therefore railing or reviling is not a mortal sin.

Obj. 2: Further, mortal sin is not to be found in perfect men; and

yet these sometimes give utterance to railing or reviling. Thus the

Apostle says (Gal. 3:1): "O senseless Galatians!," and our Lord said

(Luke 24:25): "O foolish and slow of heart to believe!" Therefore

railing or reviling is not a mortal sin.

Obj. 3: Further, although that which is a venial sin by reason of its

genus may become mortal, that which is mortal by reason of its genus

cannot become venial, as stated above (I-II, Q. 88, AA. 4, 6). Hence

if by reason of its genus it were a mortal sin to give utterance to

railing or reviling, it would follow that it is always a mortal sin.

But this is apparently untrue, as may be seen in the case of one who

utters a reviling word indeliberately or through slight anger.

Therefore reviling or railing is not a mortal sin, by reason of its

genus.

_On the contrary,_ Nothing but mortal sin deserves the eternal

punishment of hell. Now railing or reviling deserves the punishment

of hell, according to Matt. 5:22, "Whosoever shall say to his brother

. . . Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire." Therefore railing

or reviling is a mortal sin.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (A. 1), words are injurious to other

persons, not as sounds, but as signs, and this signification depends

on the speaker's inward intention. Hence, in sins of word, it seems

that we ought to consider with what intention the words are uttered.

Since then railing or reviling essentially denotes a dishonoring, if

the intention of the utterer is to dishonor the other man, this is

properly and essentially to give utterance to railing or reviling:

and this is a mortal sin no less than theft or robbery, since a man

loves his honor no less than his possessions. If, on the other hand,

a man says to another a railing or reviling word, yet with the

intention, not of dishonoring him, but rather perhaps of correcting

him or with some like purpose, he utters a railing or reviling not

formally and essentially, but accidentally and materially, in so far

to wit as he says that which might be a railing or reviling. Hence

this may be sometimes a venial sin, and sometimes without any sin at

all. Nevertheless there is need of discretion in such matters, and

one should use such words with moderation, because the railing might

be so grave that being uttered inconsiderately it might dishonor the

person against whom it is uttered. In such a case a man might commit

a mortal sin, even though he did not intend to dishonor the other

man: just as were a man incautiously to injure grievously another by

striking him in fun, he would not be without blame.

Reply Obj. 1: It belongs to wittiness to utter some slight mockery,

not with intent to dishonor or pain the person who is the object of

the mockery, but rather with intent to please and amuse: and this may

be without sin, if the due circumstances be observed. On the other

hand if a man does not shrink from inflicting pain on the object of

his witty mockery, so long as he makes others laugh, this is sinful,

as stated in the passage quoted.

Reply Obj. 2: Just as it is lawful to strike a person, or damnify him

in his belongings for the purpose of correction, so too, for the

purpose of correction, may one say a mocking word to a person whom

one has to correct. It is thus that our Lord called the disciples

"foolish," and the Apostle called the Galatians "senseless." Yet, as

Augustine says (De Serm. Dom. in Monte ii, 19), "seldom and only when

it is very necessary should we have recourse to invectives, and then

so as to urge God's service, not our own."

Reply Obj. 3: Since the sin of railing or reviling depends on the

intention of the utterer, it may happen to be a venial sin, if it be

a slight railing that does not inflict much dishonor on a man, and be

uttered through lightness of heart or some slight anger, without the

fixed purpose of dishonoring him, for instance when one intends by

such a word to give but little pain.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 486 / 1128 题