EIGHTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 55, Art. 8]

Whether These Vices Arise from Covetousness?

Objection 1: It would seem that these vices do not arise from

covetousness. As stated above (Q. 43, A. 6) lust is the chief cause

of lack of rectitude in the reason. Now these vices are opposed to

right reason, i.e. to prudence. Therefore they arise chiefly from

lust; especially since the Philosopher says (Ethic. vii, 6) that

"Venus is full of guile and her girdle is many colored" and that "he

who is incontinent in desire acts with cunning."

Obj. 2: Further, these vices bear a certain resemblance to prudence,

as stated above (Q. 47, A. 13). Now, since prudence is in the reason,

the more spiritual vices seem to be more akin thereto, such as pride

and vainglory. Therefore the aforesaid vices seem to arise from pride

rather than from covetousness.

Obj. 3: Further, men make use of stratagems not only in laying hold

of other people's goods, but also in plotting murders, the former of

which pertains to covetousness, and the latter to anger. Now the use

of stratagems pertains to craftiness, guile, and fraud. Therefore the

aforesaid vices arise not only from covetousness, but also from anger.

_On the contrary,_ Gregory (Moral. xxxi, 45) states that fraud is a

daughter of covetousness.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (A. 3; Q. 47, A. 13), carnal

prudence and craftiness, as well as guile and fraud, bear a certain

resemblance to prudence in some kind of use of the reason. Now among

all the moral virtues it is justice wherein the use of right reason

appears chiefly, for justice is in the rational appetite. Hence the

undue use of reason appears chiefly in the vices opposed to justice,

the chief of which is covetousness. Therefore the aforesaid vices

arise chiefly from covetousness.

Reply Obj. 1: On account of the vehemence of pleasure and of

concupiscence, lust entirely suppresses the reason from exercising

its act: whereas in the aforesaid vices there is some use of reason,

albeit inordinate. Hence these vices do not arise directly from lust.

When the Philosopher says that "Venus is full of guile," he is

referring to a certain resemblance, in so far as she carries man away

suddenly, just as he is moved in deceitful actions, yet not by means

of craftiness but rather by the vehemence of concupiscence and

pleasure; wherefore he adds that "Venus doth cozen the wits of the

wisest man" [*Cf. Iliad xiv, 214-217].

Reply Obj. 2: To do anything by stratagem seems to be due to

pusillanimity: because a magnanimous man wishes to act openly, as the

Philosopher says (Ethic. iv, 3). Wherefore, as pride resembles or

apes magnanimity, it follows that the aforesaid vices which make use

of fraud and guile, do not arise directly from pride, but rather from

covetousness, which seeks its own profit and sets little by

excellence.

Reply Obj. 3: Anger's movement is sudden, hence it acts with

precipitation, and without counsel, contrary to the use of the

aforesaid vices, though these use counsel inordinately. That men use

stratagems in plotting murders, arises not from anger but rather from

hatred, because the angry man desires to harm manifestly, as the

Philosopher states (Rhet. ii, 2, 3) [*Cf. _Ethic._ vii, 6].

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 382 / 1128 题