THIRD ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 54, Art. 3]

Whether Negligence Can Be a Mortal Sin?

Objection 1: It would seem that negligence cannot be a mortal sin.

For a gloss of Gregory [*Moral. ix. 34] on Job 9:28, "I feared all my

works," etc. says that "too little love of God aggravates the

former," viz. negligence. But wherever there is mortal sin, the love

of God is done away with altogether. Therefore negligence is not a

mortal sin.

Obj. 2: Further, a gloss on Ecclus. 7:34, "For thy negligences purify

thyself with a few," says: "Though the offering be small it cleanses

the negligences of many sins." Now this would not be, if negligence

were a mortal sin. Therefore negligence is not a mortal sin.

Obj. 3: Further, under the law certain sacrifices were prescribed for

mortal sins, as appears from the book of Leviticus. Yet no sacrifice

was prescribed for negligence. Therefore negligence is not a mortal

sin.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (Prov. 19:16): "He that neglecteth

his own life [Vulg.: 'way'] shall die."

_I answer that,_ As stated above (A. 2, ad 3), negligence arises out

of a certain remissness of the will, the result being a lack of

solicitude on the part of the reason in commanding what it should

command, or as it should command. Accordingly negligence may happen

to be a mortal sin in two ways. First on the part of that which is

omitted through negligence. If this be either an act or a

circumstance necessary for salvation, it will be a mortal sin.

Secondly on the part of the cause: for if the will be so remiss about

Divine things, as to fall away altogether from the charity of God,

such negligence is a mortal sin, and this is the case chiefly when

negligence is due to contempt.

But if negligence consists in the omission of an act or circumstance

that is not necessary for salvation, it is not a mortal but a venial

sin, provided the negligence arise, not from contempt, but from some

lack of fervor, to which venial sin is an occasional obstacle.

Reply Obj. 1: Man may be said to love God less in two ways. First

through lack of the fervor of charity, and this causes the negligence

that is a venial sin: secondly through lack of charity itself, in

which sense we say that a man loves God less when he loves Him with a

merely natural love; and this causes the negligence that is a mortal

sin.

Reply Obj. 2: According to the same authority (gloss), a small

offering made with a humble mind and out of pure love, cleanses man

not only from venial but also from mortal sin.

Reply Obj. 3: When negligence consists in the omission of that which

is necessary for salvation, it is drawn to the other more manifest

genus of sin. Because those sins that consist of inward actions, are

more hidden, wherefore no special sacrifices were prescribed for them

in the Law, since the offering of sacrifices was a kind of public

confession of sin, whereas hidden sins should not be confessed in

public.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 373 / 1128 题