EIGHTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 49, Art. 8]

Whether Caution Should Be Reckoned a Part of Prudence?

Objection 1: It would seem that caution should not be reckoned a part

of prudence. For when no evil is possible, no caution is required.

Now no man makes evil use of virtue, as Augustine declares (De Lib.

Arb. ii, 19). Therefore caution does not belong to prudence which

directs the virtues.

Obj. 2: Further, to foresee good and to avoid evil belong to the same

faculty, just as the same art gives health and cures ill-health. Now

it belongs to foresight to foresee good, and consequently, also to

avoid evil. Therefore caution should not be accounted a part of

prudence, distinct from foresight.

Obj. 3: Further, no prudent man strives for the impossible. But no

man can take precautions against all possible evils. Therefore

caution does not belong to prudence.

_On the contrary,_ The Apostle says (Eph. 5:15): "See how you walk

cautiously [Douay: 'circumspectly']."

_I answer that,_ The things with which prudence is concerned, are

contingent matters of action, wherein, even as false is found with

true, so is evil mingled with good, on account of the great variety

of these matters of action, wherein good is often hindered by evil,

and evil has the appearance of good. Wherefore prudence needs

caution, so that we may have such a grasp of good as to avoid evil.

Reply Obj. 1: Caution is required in moral acts, that we may be on

our guard, not against acts of virtue, but against the hindrance of

acts of virtue.

Reply Obj. 2: It is the same in idea, to ensue good and to avoid the

opposite evil, but the avoidance of outward hindrances is different

in idea. Hence caution differs from foresight, although they both

belong to the one virtue of prudence.

Reply Obj. 3: Of the evils which man has to avoid, some are of

frequent occurrence; the like can be grasped by reason, and against

them caution is directed, either that they may be avoided altogether,

or that they may do less harm. Others there are that occur rarely and

by chance, and these, since they are infinite in number, cannot be

grasped by reason, nor is man able to take precautions against them,

although by exercising prudence he is able to prepare against all the

surprises of chance, so as to suffer less harm thereby.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 347 / 1128 题