SEVENTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 49, Art. 7]

Whether Circumspection Can Be a Part of Prudence?

Objection 1: It would seem that circumspection cannot be a part of

prudence. For circumspection seems to signify looking at one's

surroundings. But these are of infinite number, and cannot be

considered by the reason wherein is prudence. Therefore

circumspection should not be reckoned a part of prudence.

Obj. 2: Further, circumstances seem to be the concern of moral

virtues rather than of prudence. But circumspection seems to denote

nothing but attention to circumstances. Therefore circumspection

apparently belongs to the moral virtues rather than to prudence.

Obj. 3: Further, whoever can see things afar off can much more see

things that are near. Now foresight enables a man to look on distant

things. Therefore there is no need to account circumspection a part

of prudence in addition to foresight.

On the contrary stands the authority of Macrobius, quoted above (Q.

48).

_I answer that,_ As stated above (A. 6), it belongs to prudence

chiefly to direct something aright to an end; and this is not done

aright unless both the end be good, and the means good and suitable.

Since, however, prudence, as stated above (Q. 47, A. 3) is about

singular matters of action, which contain many combinations of

circumstances, it happens that a thing is good in itself and suitable

to the end, and nevertheless becomes evil or unsuitable to the end,

by reason of some combination of circumstances. Thus to show signs of

love to someone seems, considered in itself, to be a fitting way to

arouse love in his heart, yet if pride or suspicion of flattery arise

in his heart, it will no longer be a means suitable to the end. Hence

the need of circumspection in prudence, viz. of comparing the means

with the circumstances.

Reply Obj. 1: Though the number of possible circumstances be

infinite, the number of actual circumstances is not; and the judgment

of reason in matters of action is influenced by things which are few

in number.

Reply Obj. 2: Circumstances are the concern of prudence, because

prudence has to fix them; on the other hand they are the concern of

moral virtues, in so far as moral virtues are perfected by the fixing

of circumstances.

Reply Obj. 3: Just as it belongs to foresight to look on that

which is by its nature suitable to an end, so it belongs to

circumspection to consider whether it be suitable to the end in view

of the circumstances. Now each of these presents a difficulty of its

own, and therefore each is reckoned a distinct part of prudence.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 346 / 1128 题