THIRTEENTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 47, Art. 13]

Whether Prudence Can Be in Sinners?

Objection 1: It would seem that there can be prudence in sinners. For

our Lord said (Luke 16:8): "The children of this world are more

prudent [Douay: 'wiser'] in their generation than the children of

light." Now the children of this world are sinners. Therefore there

be prudence in sinners.

Obj. 2: Further, faith is a more excellent virtue than prudence. But

there can be faith in sinners. Therefore there can be prudence also.

Obj. 3: Further, according to _Ethic._ vi, 7, "we say that to be of

good counsel is the work of prudent man especially." Now many sinners

can take good counsel. Therefore sinners can have prudence.

_On the contrary,_ The Philosopher declares (Ethic. vi, 12) that "it

is impossible for a man be prudent unless he be good." Now no sinner

is a good man. Therefore no sinner is prudent.

_I answer that,_ Prudence is threefold. There is a false prudence,

which takes its name from its likeness to true prudence. For since a

prudent man is one who disposes well of the things that have to be

done for a good end, whoever disposes well of such things as are

fitting for an evil end, has false prudence, in far as that which he

takes for an end, is good, not in truth but in appearance. Thus man

is called "a good robber," and in this way may speak of "a prudent

robber," by way of similarity, because he devises fitting ways of

committing robbery. This is the prudence of which the Apostle says

(Rom. 8:6): "The prudence [Douay: 'wisdom'] of the flesh is death,"

because, to wit, it places its ultimate end in the pleasures of the

flesh.

The second prudence is indeed true prudence, because it devises

fitting ways of obtaining a good end; and yet it is imperfect, from a

twofold source. First, because the good which it takes for an end, is

not the common end of all human life, but of some particular affair;

thus when a man devises fitting ways of conducting business or of

sailing a ship, he is called a prudent businessman, or a prudent

sailor; secondly, because he fails in the chief act of prudence, as

when a man takes counsel aright, and forms a good judgment, even

about things concerning life as a whole, but fails to make an

effective command.

The third prudence is both true and perfect, for it takes counsel,

judges and commands aright in respect of the good end of man's whole

life: and this alone is prudence simply so-called, and cannot be in

sinners, whereas the first prudence is in sinners alone, while

imperfect prudence is common to good and wicked men, especially that

which is imperfect through being directed to a particular end, since

that which is imperfect on account of a failing in the chief act, is

only in the wicked.

Reply Obj. 1: This saying of our Lord is to be understood of the

first prudence, wherefore it is not said that they are prudent

absolutely, but that they are prudent in "their generation."

Reply Obj. 2: The nature of faith consists not in conformity with the

appetite for certain right actions, but in knowledge alone. On the

other hand prudence implies a relation to a right appetite. First

because its principles are the ends in matters of action; and of such

ends one forms a right estimate through the habits of moral virtue,

which rectify the appetite: wherefore without the moral virtues there

is no prudence, as shown above (I-II, Q. 58, A. 5); secondly because

prudence commands right actions, which does not happen unless the

appetite be right. Wherefore though faith on account of its object is

more excellent than prudence, yet prudence, by its very nature, is

more opposed to sin, which arises from a disorder of the appetite.

Reply Obj. 3: Sinners can take good counsel for an evil end, or for

some particular good, but they do not perfectly take good counsel for

the end of their whole life, since they do not carry that counsel

into effect. Hence they lack prudence which is directed to the good

only; and yet in them, according to the Philosopher (Ethic. vi, 12)

there is "cleverness," [*_deinotike_] i.e. natural diligence which

may be directed to both good and evil; or "cunning," [*_panourgia_]

which is directed only to evil, and which we have stated above, to be

"false prudence" or "prudence of the flesh."

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 333 / 1128 题