THIRD ARTICLE [II-II, Q., 40, Art. 3]

Whether It Is Lawful to Lay Ambushes in War?

Objection 1: It would seem that it is unlawful to lay ambushes in

war. For it is written (Deut. 16:20): "Thou shalt follow justly after

that which is just." But ambushes, since they are a kind of

deception, seem to pertain to injustice. Therefore it is unlawful to

lay ambushes even in a just war.

Obj. 2: Further, ambushes and deception seem to be opposed to

faithfulness even as lies are. But since we are bound to keep faith

with all men, it is wrong to lie to anyone, as Augustine states

(Contra Mend. xv). Therefore, as one is bound to keep faith with

one's enemy, as Augustine states (Ep. ad Bonif. clxxxix), it seems

that it is unlawful to lay ambushes for one's enemies.

Obj. 3: Further, it is written (Matt. 7:12): "Whatsoever you would

that men should do to you, do you also to them": and we ought to

observe this in all our dealings with our neighbor. Now our enemy is

our neighbor. Therefore, since no man wishes ambushes or deceptions

to be prepared for himself, it seems that no one ought to carry on

war by laying ambushes.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says (QQ. in Hept. qu. x super Jos):

"Provided the war be just, it is no concern of justice whether it be

carried on openly or by ambushes": and he proves this by the

authority of the Lord, Who commanded Joshua to lay ambushes for the

city of Hai (Joshua 8:2).

_I answer that,_ The object of laying ambushes is in order to deceive

the enemy. Now a man may be deceived by another's word or deed in two

ways. First, through being told something false, or through the

breaking of a promise, and this is always unlawful. No one ought to

deceive the enemy in this way, for there are certain "rights of war

and covenants, which ought to be observed even among enemies," as

Ambrose states (De Officiis i).

Secondly, a man may be deceived by what we say or do, because we do

not declare our purpose or meaning to him. Now we are not always

bound to do this, since even in the Sacred Doctrine many things have

to be concealed, especially from unbelievers, lest they deride it,

according to Matt. 7:6: "Give not that which is holy, to dogs."

Wherefore much more ought the plan of campaign to be hidden from the

enemy. For this reason among other things that a soldier has to learn

is the art of concealing his purpose lest it come to the enemy's

knowledge, as stated in the Book on _Strategy_ [*Stratagematum i, 1]

by Frontinus. Such like concealment is what is meant by an ambush

which may be lawfully employed in a just war.

Nor can these ambushes be properly called deceptions, nor are they

contrary to justice or to a well-ordered will. For a man would have

an inordinate will if he were unwilling that others should hide

anything from him.

This suffices for the Replies to the Objections.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 283 / 1128 题