SECOND ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 40, Art. 2]

Whether It Is Lawful for Clerics and Bishops to Fight?

Objection 1: It would seem lawful for clerics and bishops to fight.

For, as stated above (A. 1), wars are lawful and just in so far as

they protect the poor and the entire common weal from suffering at

the hands of the foe. Now this seems to be above all the duty of

prelates, for Gregory says (Hom. in Ev. xiv): "The wolf comes upon

the sheep, when any unjust and rapacious man oppresses those who are

faithful and humble. But he who was thought to be the shepherd, and

was not, leaveth the sheep, and flieth, for he fears lest the wolf

hurt him, and dares not stand up against his injustice." Therefore it

is lawful for prelates and clerics to fight.

Obj. 2: Further, Pope Leo IV writes (xxiii, qu. 8, can. Igitur): "As

untoward tidings had frequently come from the Saracen side, some said

that the Saracens would come to the port of Rome secretly and

covertly; for which reason we commanded our people to gather

together, and ordered them to go down to the seashore." Therefore it

is lawful for bishops to fight.

Obj. 3: Further, apparently, it comes to the same whether a man does

a thing himself, or consents to its being done by another, according

to Rom. 1:32: "They who do such things, are worthy of death, and not

only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do

them." Now those, above all, seem to consent to a thing, who induce

others to do it. But it is lawful for bishops and clerics to induce

others to fight: for it is written (xxiii, qu. 8, can. Hortatu) that

Charles went to war with the Lombards at the instance and entreaty of

Adrian, bishop of Rome. Therefore they also are allowed to fight.

Obj. 4: Further, whatever is right and meritorious in itself, is

lawful for prelates and clerics. Now it is sometimes right and

meritorious to make war, for it is written (xxiii, qu. 8, can. Omni

timore) that if "a man die for the true faith, or to save his

country, or in defense of Christians, God will give him a heavenly

reward." Therefore it is lawful for bishops and clerics to fight.

_On the contrary,_ It was said to Peter as representing bishops and

clerics (Matt. 16:52): "Put up again thy sword into the scabbard

[Vulg.: 'its place'] [*"Scabbard" is the reading in John 18:11]."

Therefore it is not lawful for them to fight.

_I answer that,_ Several things are requisite for the good of a human

society: and a number of things are done better and quicker by a

number of persons than by one, as the Philosopher observes (Polit. i,

1), while certain occupations are so inconsistent with one another,

that they cannot be fittingly exercised at the same time; wherefore

those who are deputed to important duties are forbidden to occupy

themselves with things of small importance. Thus according to human

laws, soldiers who are deputed to warlike pursuits are forbidden to

engage in commerce [*Cod. xii, 35, De Re Milit.].

Now warlike pursuits are altogether incompatible with the duties of a

bishop and a cleric, for two reasons. The first reason is a general

one, because, to wit, warlike pursuits are full of unrest, so that

they hinder the mind very much from the contemplation of Divine

things, the praise of God, and prayers for the people, which belong

to the duties of a cleric. Wherefore just as commercial enterprises

are forbidden to clerics, because they unsettle the mind too much, so

too are warlike pursuits, according to 2 Tim. 2:4: "No man being a

soldier to God, entangleth himself with secular business." The second

reason is a special one, because, to wit, all the clerical Orders are

directed to the ministry of the altar, on which the Passion of Christ

is represented sacramentally, according to 1 Cor. 11:26: "As often as

you shall eat this bread, and drink the chalice, you shall show the

death of the Lord, until He come." Wherefore it is unbecoming for

them to slay or shed blood, and it is more fitting that they should

be ready to shed their own blood for Christ, so as to imitate in deed

what they portray in their ministry. For this reason it has been

decreed that those who shed blood, even without sin, become

irregular. Now no man who has a certain duty to perform, can lawfully

do that which renders him unfit for that duty. Wherefore it is

altogether unlawful for clerics to fight, because war is directed to

the shedding of blood.

Reply Obj. 1: Prelates ought to withstand not only the wolf who

brings spiritual death upon the flock, but also the pillager and the

oppressor who work bodily harm; not, however, by having recourse

themselves to material arms, but by means of spiritual weapons,

according to the saying of the Apostle (2 Cor. 10:4): "The weapons of

our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God." Such are

salutary warnings, devout prayers, and, for those who are obstinate,

the sentence of excommunication.

Reply Obj. 2: Prelates and clerics may, by the authority of their

superiors, take part in wars, not indeed by taking up arms

themselves, but by affording spiritual help to those who fight

justly, by exhorting and absolving them, and by other like spiritual

helps. Thus in the Old Testament (Joshua 6:4) the priests were

commanded to sound the sacred trumpets in the battle. It was for this

purpose that bishops or clerics were first allowed to go to the

front: and it is an abuse of this permission, if any of them take up

arms themselves.

Reply Obj. 3: As stated above (Q. 23, A. 4, ad 2) every power, art or

virtue that regards the end, has to dispose that which is directed to

the end. Now, among the faithful, carnal wars should be considered as

having for their end the Divine spiritual good to which clerics are

deputed. Wherefore it is the duty of clerics to dispose and counsel

other men to engage in just wars. For they are forbidden to take up

arms, not as though it were a sin, but because such an occupation is

unbecoming their personality.

Reply Obj. 4: Although it is meritorious to wage a just war,

nevertheless it is rendered unlawful for clerics, by reason of their

being deputed to works more meritorious still. Thus the marriage act

may be meritorious; and yet it becomes reprehensible in those who

have vowed virginity, because they are bound to a yet greater good.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 282 / 1128 题